• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Miracles and science are irreconcilable - Modern Christians must adapt their beliefs to the superior claims of science.

Extracts from this document...


Miracles and science are irreconcilable. Modern Christians must adapt their beliefs to the superior claims of science. A miracle can be defined as a happening which does not have a logical explanation and can be interpreted as the interference of a superior power. Science is based on logic and fact and therefore sees miracles as nothing more than disruptions to the laws of the universe. The question of whether Christians living in this modern, scientific age, should adapt their beliefs to the 'superior' claims of science is open for discussion. There are a multitude of miracles described in the Bible. They can fit into four categories: healing the sick, casting out demons, showing power over nature and raising people from the dead. Jesus' life on earth itself was a miracle from his conception and the virgin birth to his resurrection and subsequent ascension into heaven which is described in Acts 1:9; "He was taken up from before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their sight." During his 33 years on the earth Jesus performed many miracles which are detailed in the gospels. He tells the disciples the reason for them in John 4:48, "Unless you people see miraculous signs and wonders you will never believe." Amongst these miracles are the water into wine incident, John 2:7-9, "Jesus said to the servants, 'Fill the jars with water', so they filled them to the brim. ...read more.


They are merely descriptions of what God makes happen." This is an extremely valid point as God being the creator and sustainer of the universe has the power to do anything he wishes with his creation. The laws were put in place by him so should we find it so difficult to believe that he breaks them when it is necessary? It is impossible to find another explanation for these occurrences and as CS Lewis stated, "Christ demonstrated a power over natural forces that could only belong to God, the author of these forces." If we believe that God created the universe we must also believe that he occasionally intervened in situations for his own purpose. As AE Garvie writes, "A Christ who being the son of God, and seeking to become Saviour of men, (and) wrought no miracle, would be less intelligible and credible than the Jesus whom the gospel records so consistently present to us." If Jesus did not have the power to defy nature there would be little reason in placing faith in him. His period in this world was used to demonstrate his power over natural forces and encourage those who were sceptical to believe. It was evidence of his identity and a demonstration of his authority over the universe even although he does say in scripture that he does not have to prove himself to mankind. ...read more.


It is no more superior to Christianity in its claims only in the way it presents them which is often as fact and not as one of many possibilities. In our modern era science does have a stronger influence on people than religion which requires followers to rely on faith but it can still not be described as superior. There is no question that science and miracles are irreconcilable. An inexplicable event is not accepted by science and must be proven either to have a rational origin we as of yet have not discovered or put down to the deceitful nature of mankind claiming to have experienced miracles. Modern Christians should not have to adapt their beliefs to the claims of science as they are no more superior than the claims of Christianity or any other religion. Christians should stay faithful to their convictions as their meaning has not and will not diminish in time as countless scientific theories have. The claims of the Bible will always be conceivable with faith. Science has to admit to failure in the past. Scientists were adamant an atom couldn't be split until fifty years ago and a few centuries ago it was common belief that the earth was flat! Within a few centuries time scientific claims will again be moderated to suit new breakthroughs whereas the word of God will continue to stand the test the time no matter how many interrogations it faces. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Miracles section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Miracles essays

  1. To what extent is faith a legitimate basis for knowledge claims, in religion and ...

    In what way does knowledge go beyond faith and belief? Knowledge claims include having justification or good reason to support your belief. The definition for knowledge is that it is a justified true belief. For instance, a scientist would claim that there is evidence that there is no other form of life in this galaxy as found on earth.

  2. is faith a legitimate basis for knowledge claims?

    Let us move from religion to knowledge claims and areas of knowledge. Knowing means grasping and retaining something in your mind with clarity, according to most dictionaries. This definition does not imply that you have to have proof to argue about the degree of rationality about what you know.

  1. Tim Winton in his 'quintessentially Australian' novel Cloudstreet challenges modern perceptions of spirituality with ...

    amount of fish which 'leapt into the boat on their own accord'(p 216). This experience, where he also sees an Aborigine walking on water, occurs whilst he is suffering intense guilt about Fish's disability, and this leads Quick to a religious awakening.

  2. Some people say that religious beliefs can be neither justified nor refuted by reason

    Trust appears at many levels and in some way we trust ourselves as well- we believe in our own perception. At first reason, although seems like an exception to the fact that our knowledge is based on beliefs. However, the Princeton dictionary3 defines reason as: A rational motive for a

  1. To what extend is faith a legitimate basis for knowledge claims, in religion and ...

    Faith cannot be defined as something ONLY religious. On the contrary, there are different types of faiths scientific faith, theological faith and human faith. The scientific faith is believing that theories developed by scientists are correct. To show this we could take the following case: scientists have developed a theory of atoms yet this theory is proven by

  2. 'Miracles are a matter of faith, not fact', discuss.

    his failure to do so on more occasions raises questions about his morality. Why does he answer the prayers of some and ignore others? Why did he save the Jews from slavery in Egypt by the parting of the red sea but not at the Holocaust?

  1. How far may theology be reconciled with science in explaining the nature of, and ...

    used to prove to the people watching that Jesus was the Son of God. Miracles have a strong theological purpose, but in the New Testament they are not portrayed as simply 'made up' stories, but to accomplish a theological purpose.

  2. Describe the history and symbolism of the festival of Pesach - How may ...

    This is a good way to teach younger children about the story as they relate better to symbols, which are visual aids, rather than a lecture of the story. Also, when learning about the story of Pesach, I found it easy to remember the story by using the food symbols in the Seder meal we re-enacted as a class.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work