• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Morality, therefore, is more properly felt than judg'd of'. How does Hume reach this conclusion? Do you accept his argument?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Tutorial Essay Question One Write an essay of not more than 1,000 words in answer to one of the following questions. The essay is to be handed in at the next tutorial. 1. 'Morality, therefore, is more properly felt than judg'd of'. How does Hume reach this conclusion? Do you accept his argument? 2. How does the is-ought gap relate to Hume's attack on those who think reason is the basis of moral distinctions? Reading: Hume, D. A Treatise of Human Nature, Book III, Part 1, Sections 1 and 2. 'Morality, therefore, is more properly felt than judg'd of'. How does Hume reach this conclusion? Do you accept his argument? In his Treatise of Human Nature, David Hume outlines his theory of human morality. Hume's argument is that human morality is not based on rational thought and reason, but rather is a consequence of our passions. Due to the fact that passions themselves can never present themselves as the product of any sort of reasoning, it would be illogical to ever judge a moral action as rational or irrational. ...read more.

Middle

Hume maintains that if moral distinctions were based on relations discovered by reason, then non-reasoning and even inanimate objects would be capable of vice and virtue. For instance, it is morally wrong for a son to murder his father. However, "let us chuse any inanimate object, such as an oak or elm; and let us suppose, that by the dropping of its seed, it produces a sapling below it, which springing up by degrees, at last overtops and destroys the parent tree". The relations involved in the sapling killing the parent tree, and the son killing his father are the same. If relations alone were what constituted right and wrong, then the sapling would be guilty of murder - even if it was claimed that the sapling had no choice, as the relations would be the same. Another way in which reason could distinguish between right and wrong is by discovering a fact in an agent's character that makes their act virtuous or vicious. However, this is also not possible, according to Hume, as facts in the mind of a person are only vicious if the thoughts are actually implemented. ...read more.

Conclusion

Reason can never motivate, by itself, whereas morality is, Hume seems to say, intrinsically motivating, at least to some degree. His argument is as follows: 1. The judgment that some act is wrong, or that some passion is vicious, is intrinsically motivating in the sense that a person so judges only if she is motivated (or would be under certain conditions) against the action or passion to some degree. 2. Reason can only lead us to beliefs that such-and-such is the case, and no such belief is intrinsically motivating in this sense. 3. Therefore, no moral judgment can derive from reason. To say then, that morality is "more properly felt than judg'd of" is not the same as endorsing emotivism or non-cognitivism. It is simply to recognize the crucial role of sentiment in practical moral discovery. More generally, claiming that reason is unable to accomplish practical moral discovery is not the same as to claim that it has no role in the discovery of morals, that morals are invented rather than discovered, or that so-called moral judgments are not really judgments at all. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. What is the relationship between religion and morality?

    The abolition of slavery came about party because of Martin Luther King in his assertion that we were all equal in the eyes of God. Such achievement, it could be argued, could only be achieved through faith. However, atheists and agnostics, who do not believe in or follow any religion, can still live truly moral lives.

  2. Aristotle - Virtue Ethics Essay

    individual facing a moral dilemma than the Catholic religious ethical theory of Natural Law. The theory of Natural Law developed by St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) but this ethical standpoint is somewhat antiquated. Most people in society, regardless of how religious they may be, do not act in terms of whether

  1. TOK Essay: Reason and Emotion

    Feelings are what connect one human being to another, and when humans base their moral decisions according to what is best for those who are close to them they are listening to their emotions much more than they are listening to reason.

  2. Explain the differences between relative morality and absolute morality.

    there is an underlying common denominator beneath all moral codes existing in different cultures. In almost every society there is a hatred of crimes such as unecessary killing [murder], theft and abuse. However the interpretation of these is different in different cultures.

  1. Famine, Affluence and Morality - Peter Singer.

    help would be more likely to take place in the first place, rather than not at all. Also, one would be in a better position to decide how precisely to help someone near to one than if that person were far away.

  2. Are all human actions motivated by self-interest?

    This is an empirical claim. And as such is prone to the problem of induction2. To say that all humans act selfishly is a universal claim. But you cannot make such a universal claim without knowledge of every human action performed in past, present, and future.

  1. Explain and discuss one critique of the link between religion and morality

    These views actually show us that although some Catholics believe their morality stems from their religious beliefs, it actually stems from common sense and practicality. They are in fact choosing to follow the rules from their religion that are practical and logical for example do not kill, while ignoring the rules which they consider illogical or wrong.

  2. Discuss whether moral judgments are subjective or objective

    This school of thought defines good and bad in terms of pleasure and pain, whatever action brings about the greatest feeling of pleasure deemed good, whilst the action that is favored by the minority is deemed either bad or neutral.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work