• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Natural Law Theory is too rigid. Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Natural Law Theory is too rigid. Discuss. Aquinas' Natural Law Theory explains that the truth (morality) is revealed through nature and that everything has a purpose (telos). For example the telos of an acorn is to become an oak tree. Aquinas believed that through reason and scripture, Humans know what is right and wrong. He thought that, using Aristotelian theories, Humans are both the Efficient and Final causes, and it is our own responsibility to reach our summum bonum (greatest good) by carrying out God's will and spending an eternal life with him. Humans are also the only beings that can hinder telos, either their own or something else's, for instance treading on an acorn prevents it from becoming an oak tree. ...read more.

Middle

But is everyone inclined towards the good? Many people do wrong despite knowing it, for instance vandals. Another point criticising the Synderesis rule is that Darwin's theory of 'survival of the fittest' implies that Humans are self-interested. One major criticism of the Natural Law Theory is that Aquinas presupposes that God created the world and humanity and that they were created for a purpose. There is no proof that God create the world and humanity, but there is a possibility, God is at an epistemic distance, he is close enough for people to believe but too far away for people to know him. According to Bertrand Russell and Richard Dawkins, the universe is random. ...read more.

Conclusion

There are some advantages of Natural Law. There are clear guidelines and is a fixed moral code, therefore it can be applied universally and Aquinas believed it was innate. This Divine Command theory is easy to follow as it is centred on human nature and it is deontological so people can make judgements regardless of situation. When the Natural Law Theory is compared with more relativist ones, it appears to be weaker as it uses objective truths and so what may be considered wrong may have so many benefits, for example an abortion for a rape victim. A relativist would allow the abortion, as they'd understand that the mother may not be able to provide for a child. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Miscellaneous section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Miscellaneous essays

  1. Christianity and Abortion

    Some Christians may argue that abortion is always wrong as God has a plan set out for each and every one of us, and abortion interferes with this plan and therefore must be against God. Some non-Christians may say that abortion is acceptable if medical tests show that the child

  2. Christian views on Abortion

    This is seen as the lesser of two evils. Many people that don't have a religion also have views. Some say there is a great need for abortions because we are overpopulating the planet therefore by allowing abortions the birth rate is kept low. The Bible contains no specific prohibition on abortion, although several passages (e.g.

  1. Christian view on contraception

    The most abundantly documented truth in the Bible concerning children is that they come from God as his gift and that he, and he alone, has the privilege of giving and with holding children. This choice is God s choice not a choice to be made by humans.

  2. Explain and evaluate the different perspectives on Religion offered by Richard Dawkins and Alister ...

    This I think is a good point but slightly unjust not to mention the huge understatement of science being a 'useful tool'. Another good point that Dawkins uses not so much on the subject of science disproving God rather that it has explained the origins of it is the idea of science being a meme.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work