• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Only God has the right to interfere with our genes. Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


(b) 'Only God has the right to interfere with our genes' This statement is much debated as the development of science increases. The more advanced genetic engineering gets, the more people become aware about how developed it may grow to be. Which brings up the issue highlighted in the above statement, are humans starting to interfere too much with our genes? Should humans be able to clone plants, animals and one day possibly people? Should humans be able cure genetic illnesses? Or is all of this 'playing God' and interfering with God's 'overall plan'? Genetic engineering is "the deliberate modification of the characters of an organism by the manipulation of the genetic material" (Oxford English Dictionary). Basically changing a living organism by altering its genes. Mostly, at this time, genetic engineering is used to research prevention and cures for genetic diseases such as Huntington's disease and cystic fybrosis. ...read more.


Almost everyone against genetic research is worried about how it may effect our way of life in the future. Some Genetic researchers are already offering the chances to design your baby, for example choosing hair and eye colour, sex etc. They're concerned that genetic engineering may take over the natural way of producing children. Cardinal Basil Hume in The Independent voiced this opinion on 15.3.97. "I do fear for the future however, if the language of bodily human love is gradually replaced by and artificial process, if procreation becomes production and if the individual human being becomes valued as a produce to be ordered rather than a gift to be received." On the other hand, many people are for genetic engineering as it offers the prospect of cures for horrible diseases and that it is stupid to have the opportunity to relieve this suffering and not take it. ...read more.


Religions, such as Christianity and Islam, are divided on this subject. With some groups agreeing with the statement believing that changing a genetic makeup is meddling in God's work and with others disagreeing because the Qur'an and the Bible both say that you should do as much as possible to end suffering. Also they believe that they are working with God to improve human life and that the knowledge to do so is a gift from God. However they all seem t agree that in the area that cloning and creating a 'perfect person' is wrong because it interferes in God's role of creation. In my opinion, to some extent I agree with the statement in the area of creating a 'perfect person' and cloning people as I think that some things should be left to nature or God. As well as I don't like the idea, that in the future, humans may be created in a non-personal almost 'farming way'. However I disagree with the statement to the extent that I think everything possible should be done to help cure or prevent diseases. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Abortion and other medical issues section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Abortion and other medical issues essays

  1. "Only God has the right to interfere with our genes"

    Others believe that God has created the genetic make up of each individual and it is not for us to change it. Some Christians believe that life on Earth must not be perfect because Heaven is perfect and it is a sin to try to create heaven on Earth.

  2. child development

    pulse Under 100 beats a min Over 100 beats a min Grimace No response to stimulation Whimpers slightly in response Cries loudly Activity Limp and floppy muscles Some movement of arms and legs Moving well Respiration Not breathing Slow and irregular Breathing well Premature and low weight babies Babies that

  1. Challenges to Roe v. Wade - women's right to privacy?

    Whether to provide access to the abortion or to limit and even restrain it, still remains one of the most controversial issues of the modern society4. However, I strongly believe every person has to have a right to decide himself how to dispose with his/her life.

  2. "Death is God's business and people should not interfere"

    In the past the word abortion usually meant to nonmedical persons the elective interruption of a pregnancy, whereas "miscarriage" indicated a spontaneous expulsion of the uterine contents. The term miscarriage is seldom used medically. Abortion is generally permitted within Islam unless it is to save the mother's life.

  1. Does the discovery that much of a person's ability and character is pre-determined by ...

    Some of the world's most prominent scientists declared opposition for such radical actions and history eventually began to reverse itself. The laws against miscegenation were finally overturned, but it wasn't until 1976 that Sweden brought an end to its eugenic sterilisations.

  2. Only God has the right to interfere with our genes.(TM) Do you agree?

    rich people as it is being carried out in other countries which are easily accessible to people who can afford it. Adult cells would be used for stem cell cloning instead of embryos when it becomes easy enough. It is monitored by law but has many potential benefits.

  1. Abortion: Right or Wrong?

    It is uncivilised and unjust in their eyes. Furthermore, Pro-Life activists claim an alternative to abortion always exists no matter what the circumstances. They claim abortion is rarely necessary to save the life of the woman, and it causes women to suffer from post-abortion guilt and trauma.

  2. Embryo Research.

    [Richard Doerflinger, National Conference of Catholic Bishops. Response at a PBS News hour forum (Ref. 6)]. * The pro-choice position: Pro-choice beliefs are based on the assumption that a fertilized ovum is not a human being; it is rather potential human life.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work