• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Ontological Argument

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

a) Explain the Ontological argument from Anselm, and Guinilo's objections to it. (33) Anselm largely bases his argument on a priori principles centered on the very essence of God. He argues for the existence of God with a definition from the bible, as "that than which nothing greater can be conceived". Anselm simply argues in 'The Proslogion' that there must be a God as everyone has an idea of him, therefore he argues that everyone can have a conception of God of "that than which nothing greater can be thought". Therefore God is not a fictional creation as otherwise we would have no concept of him and so he can exist both in thought and reality, he is a supremely perfect being and is not inferior to any thought or idea. There are two parts to Anselm's argument one proving Gods existence and the other proving Gods necessary existence. ...read more.

Middle

However one of Anselm's contemporaries Gaunilo, created an overload objection, where he came up with an alternate theory; where he states that if a person were to describe the ultimate island "it would necessarily exist because of its perfections". Gaunilo believed that Anselm's thought process was not logical due to his process of stating a definition of God to then using this to prove his existence. Gaunilo's example of an ideal and supreme island of a person's dreams does not mean that it has to exist in reality because of its complete perfection. However philosophers such as Plantinga view this is flawed as how can you compare a supreme and ultimate being-God to an island which has no intrinsic maximum and so can always be improved upon? Therefore this criticism is flawed as he is referring to an island which is contingent and so does not have necessary existence. b) ...read more.

Conclusion

Thus distinguishing between an analytic statement; necessity which is about logic i.e. math factual and therefore true and an synthetic statement; existence is about experience. Thus the conclusion is that its acceptable to believe that it is logical for Gods existence to be logical, however it is not imperative to believe and accept that there is a God and he exists. Another criticism is that of the definition of God as the "greatest and most perfect being "-can human beings truly understand and comprehend this concept? Also the thought process which Gaunilo undertakes comes under scrutiny, he moves from a thought of existence of an item to them stating the actual existence of that thing-surely this is not logical and casts dispersions on Gaunilo's argument. Russell uses the Sylogism "Men exist, Santa Clause is a man, therefore, Santa Clause exists" to argue against Anselm's use of 'exist' as a predicate and show that his argument is incorrect as it other wise wouldn't be able to justify such an illogical thing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Ontological Argument - Describe and explain the ontological argument for the existence ...

    Similarly, Kant said that the ontological argument was invalid because one cannot be going around making a list of attributes and adding existence to the attributes, in order to bring it into reality. Kant claimed that when we have specified something, we must go outside that specification to determine if that thing actually exists.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    There is not a doubt that there exists a being, than which nothing greater can be conceived. Therfore it exists both in the understanding and in reality. Anselm examinies the difference between that which exists in the mind and that which exists both in the mind and outside of the mind as well.

  1. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    he maintains that as we know that computer programmes come from minds, we should similarly assume that DNA comes from a mind - the mind of God.7 Similarly he says that scientists look for extra-terrestrial intelligence by looking for coded signals which are ordered and non-random from space.

  2. "The Ontological Argument fails to prove God's existence"

    Instead, Aquinas thought the only way to prove God's existence was through a posteriori knowledge, because any argument for the existence of God has to be based on the evidence God leaves us in the world. Aquinas said that even if the argument succeeded to prove God's existence, it would

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    A being is maximally excellent in a world W if and only if it is omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect in W; and 2. A being is maximally great in a world W if and only if it is maximally excellent in every possible world.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    brought things into existence and the cosmological argument states that this is God. Aquinas propagated the popular form of the cosmological argument. He developed five ways to prove the existence of God; the first three are used in the cosmological argument.

  1. "The Ontological Argument is a logical sleight of hand." Discuss

    He states that like a triangle must have three sides, so God must exist. It is impossible to imagine a triangle with less or more than three sides, and it is illogical to think of God without thinking that he exists.

  2. Describe the ontological argument with reactions and contributions made to it by philosophers.

    God is such a being, he can not not exist. Two modern day suporters of theory are Norman Malcom and Alvin Plantinga. Malcom said that Gods existence was either impossible or necessary and, assuming that the concept of God is neither absurd or contradictory, God must be necessary and therefore exist.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work