• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the argument from religious experience to the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...


Outline the argument from religious experience to the existence of God (8) It is an undisputed fact that some people claim to have experienced God. It is these religious experiences that have been used by philosophers to argue for the existence of God. The main way of expressing the argument from religious experience is as follows: P1 Someone experiences an entity C1 The entity exists P2 Someone has experienced God C2 God exists Those who champion the argument seek to differentiate ordinary experiences and religious experiences. The supporters of this argument argue that there are several key differences between the two types of experience: that religious experiences are completely different from what is normal and usual; that it is not usual to be able to describe a religious experience; religious experience cannot usually be checked (i.e. someone else cannot check to see whether it has happened or not); and it gives insight into the unseen. All religious experiences take the form of either 'a sense of oneness or union with the divine', 'a sense of dependence on the divine' and 'a sense of separateness from the divine'. All of these are to do with direct experience and this is what the topic of religious experience is debated on. When people claim to have had a religious experience, it can usually be categorised by being non-inferential, being experienced through one or more of the five senses and being something like the way that you would experience people. ...read more.


The idea of God appearing to someone is often rejected because the cynic believes that the idea of a God existing is intrinsically incoherent. That is, the claim is rejected on the grounds of non-belief; on the grounds that the descriptions of religious experience are contrary to our normal experience of this world and its limitations. Another criticism placed against the argument is that of a case of 'mistaken identity' of which there are two major instances. Firstly, there is the complete misidentification of the experience as an experience of God. For example, people have often mistaken someone for someone else and made assumptions and judgements built on these false premises; it is argued that the same line of reasoning could be applied to religious experience. Secondly, there is the more pressing issue of the misinterpretation of religious experience. It is argued that since we can all be so easily deceived by experience, it is unwise to use an experience to claim that something is the case. However, there are those who disagree with these criticisms because they do not imply a complete rubbishing of the experience argument; just because people can misinterpret events or experiences, this does not mean that every religious experience (or indeed any of them) have been results of misinterpretation. A main criticism of the argument is that the content of arguments for God from religious experience are far too vague to constitute anything approaching a proof. ...read more.


For example, you can love someone but it would be nearly impossible for this to be proven by tests of any kind. Some people have rejected the religious experience argument on the ground that some scientists seem to have found ways of explaining such a phenomena. Ludwig Feuerbach rejected religious experience on the grounds that God is the creation of human imagination; the product of a desire for there to be something else that the experiences of the world we normally inhabit. Neurologists from the University of California have also proved that stimulating a certain region of the brain brings about the sense of a spiritual experience. Believers do not think that this is a major criticism, however, because they argue this simply proves that God designed humans with an ability to receive religious experiences. The argument that the existence of God can be proved by religious experience relies on the assumption that the experience itself can give some sort of guarantee that you are right. In conclusion, I believe that is hard to believe in an argument that does not and cannot distinguish between feeling that something is right and actually being right. This is emphasised even more when we consider that nearly every human has, at one point in their life, been sure about something and then they have consequently been proved wrong. It is this misplaced optimism in subjectivity that makes believe that this argument has failed. Tom Hubbard -Green 16 / 10 / 03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Analyse the key concepts of religious experience as an argument for the existence of ...

    In supporting the probability of the existence of God, Brain Davies makes the point that experience can tell a reasonable person that God exists. Davies shows how someone can assert that there is a God without appealing to anything other than a direct contact with God.

  2. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    of the person who has them, not of the objective existence of the being who is said to produce them i.e. God. In the book 'Philosophy of Religion' by Anne Jordan, Neil Lockyer & Edwin Tate it says religious experience is where you 'conjure up a wide and diverse series

  1. "Discuss critically religious and secular ethical arguments about environmental issues"

    We must use our reasoning to search for and pursue the purpose that God has put into the world as its creator. However, human initiative is brought into question when we start using this 'reason' and intelligence to build nuclear bombs capable of destroying the entire planet several times over,

  2. Logical Positivism and the Meaninglessness of Religious Language.

    These, however, cannot give us any information about something existence in the physical reality because they are solely about language - e.g., 'a bachelor is an unmarried man'; or '2 plus 2 equals 4'. * Synthetic propositions: must be verifiable through some form of empirical evidence, as in science.

  1. Analyse the key concepts of Religious experience as an argument for the existence of ...

    The interpretations result in the reliability of the experiences to be questioned, also it can be argued that the experience is just an interpretation, and that this interpretation can change.

  2. Discuss two criticisms of the argument from religious experience. To what extent is the ...

    Yet he still maintained that experiences of the divine are our "collective unconscious" recognising symbols and archetypes. Marx asserted that reports of this phenomenon are designed by the ruling classes to numb the proletariat from revolution. He saw religion as a stabilising opiate and any suppositious encounter served only to reinforce this "closed" doctrine.

  1. What do religious believers mean by the 'problem of suffering?' Select any two ...

    By this he meant that we could not develop in a perfect world, we therefore need challenge and struggles. Humans will be rewarded for their suffering eventually in heaven and those who do not reach the likeness of God before death can continue to develop in purgatory.

  2. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    That is that the universe exists now and it exists contingently. By definition all that exists contingently relies on something else, and when applied to the universe Christians would argue that that 'something else' is God. The next inductive argument is the argument for design.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work