• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the arguments for and against life after death? Assess the significance of the following: reincarnation, resurrection and the immortality of the soul?

Extracts from this document...


Belief in life after death has taken many forms, some which are unique in particular religious belief systems, though; others can be found in more than one religion. 'For most religions, life after death is an article of faith. In Western religions, the belief is founded in scriptural evidence, but for all religions the belief in life after death is the same: life after death has been promised to humans by an all powerful'1 There are many views of life after death in particular which have been much adhered to and much discussed by philosophers. This essay will attempt to put forward some of the key ideas and arguments for and against life after death. One view of life after death does have a venerable philosophical history. It can be found in Plato's Phaedo. Here we are presented with the figure of Socrates who is about to drink poison because he has been condemned to death. His friends are grief stricken but Socrates assures them that he is perfectly able to survive death. His friends ask Socrates how he wants to buried and he responds to them by saying "however you wish, provided you catch me, that is, and I don't get away from you". ...read more.


Hume's views are stated in his 'essay on the immortality of the soul'. The first paragraph of his essay contains the following sentence- 'but in reality it is the Gospel and the Gospel alone, that has brought life and immortality to life'. This view of life after death is severely criticised because the argument does not seem to cohere. The philosopher Flew, an atheist argued that the idea of non-bodily existence is not just false but incoherent. However, there are some scholars that hold the view that immaterial existence is at least possible. In Jeff Astleys article 'thinking about life after death' he notes H. H Prices view on the survival of a disembodied self. Price paints a coherent picture of a dream like world of immaterial objects. Prices view was that 'souls inhabit a coherent immaterial world, one in which imaging replaces perceiving. Experiences would be like perceptions in dreams, in that they would be mind dependant and have their own space. Dream objects occupy their own space but this space is not part of the space of this waking world'6. If we experience and act in dreams via dreamed bodies so could we do this in a life beyond the grave. Price also went on and said that 'communication between minds would be via telepathy. ...read more.


This is the view that when we die that is it, there is nothing more. Supporters of this theory include many well-known philosophers such as Bertrand Russell and A J Ayer who were both existentialists. The most notable philosopher is however a Greek one namely Epicurus. This philosopher stated that although death maybe painful, it is soon over and there is no life after death thus no hell. Epicurus maybe correct that there is no life after death but he is wrong in his thinking that his argument could overcome human fear of death because for many the fear of non-existing is the prime reason for the fear of death. To conclude, ultimately the only way life after death is verifiable is via eschatological verification. All of the views supporting the idea of there being a life after death are not coherent because they namely lack empirical evidence. 1 Philosophy of religion life after death by Jonathan Webber 2 Philosophy of religion life after death by Jonathan Webber 3 Topic 5 Human Destiny by Sarah Tyler 4 Philosophy of Religion by Stephen T Davis page 701 5 Philosophy of Religion by Stephen T Davis page 703 6 Jeff Astley- thinking about life after death 7 Jeff Astley- thinking about life after death 8 Philosophy of Religion by Stephen T Davis page 705 Philosophy of Religion: Life After Death 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. The Impact of the Black Death on the Christian Faith

    to the number of one thousand three hundred and forty eight, when into the notable city of Florence, fair over every other of Italy, there came to death-dealing pestilence, which, through the operation of the heavenly bodies or of our own iniquitous doings, being sent down upon mankind for our

  2. Free essay

    "Death is nothing to us." How good are the Epicurean arguments for this ...

    The soul is believed (by Epicureans) to be the "primary cause of sensation".2 Epicurus thinks that we should match our actions in determining them by a moral code, by checking each desire to see if it is the approved kind or not.

  1. The three main theories that will be discussed in this essay will stem from ...

    Any talk of a soul was talk about the way in which a person acted and integrated with others and the world. It was not something that was separate or distinct. When one says that 'he bought me a left shoe and a right shoe' he would not say 'he

  2. The albatross is described to be "a Christian soul" and it was acclaimed at ...

    In both the life of a human and the life of an albatross, there is a spark of life and in a pantheistic sense, God can be found in both. A great lesson the story teaches us is that there is one life running through all of nature, man bird or beast.

  1. In this philosophical study of applied ethics the concept of punishment will be argued ...

    As an alternative to the biblical objectivity Kant's philosophical argument - Philosophy of Law attempts to provide a non-metaphysical but universal argument justification for the retributive argument which for legal capital punishment. Kant rules out any reformative or deterrent aims of punishment in the first instance, an offender is punished because he has committed a crime and deserves it.

  2. Religions and thier opinion on life after death.

    Liberal Jews believe that the body is just a shell for the soul and god will judge the soul they believe in cremation as the soul leaves the body quicker that way. Reform Jews are more interested in the earthly life and a phrase is " what can we know of death, we who can not understand life.

  1. Is there any reason to suppose that I will survive my death?

    Kant goes on to explain that this perfection requires perfect rationality, which in turn requires that emotions are rendered powerless. Since such a task will take infinity to complete, we must suppose that we have an infinite life. This is one example of an argument based on the nature of human life.

  2. Describe the teachings and beliefs of Islam about death and what may happen after ...

    There is no lack of dignity in a person being ill. If he cannot control his own body functions, then he should be helped with these. To terminate his life for that reason is inhumane. To speak of euthanasia in this case is actually to suggest that people are unwilling

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work