• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the basic principles of sentencing

Extracts from this document...


Outline the basic principles of sentencing Legal system is one of the most important parts of the Government, which directly affects the society and people in the society; as a result, researchers and criticisers have always inspected it. This essay will outline the basic principles of sentencing in United Kingdom. There are five general aims or functions or justifications of punishment in the UK's legal system, which are: 1. RETRIBUTION Retribution rests on the notion that if a person has knowingly done wrong, he or she deserves to be punished. This idea was at the heart of the previous Conservative Government's White Paper" Crime, Justice and Protecting the Public". The Government aims, repeated several times, were to ensure that convicted criminals receive their 'just desert'. Punishing offenders satisfies the requirement that a rule imposes a penalty for its own breach, that penalty must be imposed. 2. DETERRENCE There is a belief that punishment for crime can deter people from committing same offence and can stop criminals re-offending their crimes. There are two forms: * Specific deterrence is concerned with punishing an individual offender in the expectation that he will not offend again. ...read more.


Community service is another useful retribution, which could help offenders experience the feeling of being part of the society and work for it, as a kind of rehabilitation, whilst they are reimburse the cost of their crime to the society and the government. In this case, people who commit certain crimes related to the society, damaging public properties are mainly included. On the other hand, some people do not damage directly anything, but the result of their action will affect the regularity of the society and will cause some expenses to it. For instant, a driver who passes the red light could cause an accident which means more work for police and cleaners. In this situation, that driver will be fined. It seems to be difficult to say if they are successful in reducing the number of crimes. Each one has its own advantages and disadvantages. Imprisonment, the most serious punishment in the UK, makes people fear of committing crimes, but since the first time that someone goes to prison the fear of going to prison become less and less and does not deter further offending. ...read more.


Second, although the deterrent effect of capital punishment has been unjustifiably maligned, the evidence is overwhelming that the potential for negative consequences deters or alters behavior. History and the social sciences fully support that finding. Three major studies were released in 2001, all finding for the deterrent effect of the death penalty. One, out of Emory University, finds that "each execution results, on average, in 18 fewer murders--with a margin of error of plus or minus 10." Death penalty opponents want us to believe that the most severe criminal sanction--execution--deters no one. However, if reason is your guide and you remain unsure of deterrence, you are left with the following consideration. If the death penalty does deter, halting executions will cause more innocents to be slaughtered by giving murderers an additional opportunity to harm and murder again. In my opinion, the sentencing procedure and the punishments are not really affective, as we cannot see too much different in the crime rate after hundreds of years. If the legal system were completely perfect, we would not see any more crime in the society now. In fact, the sentencing system and the judgment system should be reformed and new way of justice should be developed, because a lot of innocent are being held incorrectly, because they cannot prove their innocence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. “Billy Budd” - A Critical Analysis of Symbolism

    Billy is again held in contrast to Jesus. Jesus was accused of a crime he didn't commit and was executed for it. There are supporting arguments on this, Rowie Torres mentions that "I think that the justice is plainly unfair..." and "I think it's because of the fact that a Christlike figure had to die..."

  2. Capital Punishment, is it an effective or ineffective deterrent?

    cannot imagine the feelings if your loved one is to be executed by the state for a crime that they have not committed. Lord Callaghan stated '...it should not be forgotten that there are men who would have been hanged although they were innocent, but who are alive today because

  1. Analyse the philosophical principles of at least one ethical theory and evaluate its application ...

    to life, regardless of any crime they commit, then there is no arguing for the death penalty. Similarly, if one believes that, criminal's rights aside, no entity, including the state, can rightly take a life, then there is no use in arguing for capital punishment.

  2. The British Penal System

    PUNISHMENTS IN THE PAST AND SUITABLY OF THEM It is noted that punishments in the UK have significantly changed. The punishments implemented and practised in the past were drastic and used for the pettiest crimes. Compared to that of today, where it seems as though the alternative forms of punishment

  1. Our aim of for both questions is to explore the guilty conduct required of ...

    This can be either a voluntary act or omission of an informed human third party, or secondly it can be an act of God. If it was an intervening act it is not significant for Carl, it is only significant for Aisha, since it relieves her of liability.

  2. Were Morant and Handcock murderers or 'scapegoats of the empire'?

    Admiral Sir George Digby Morant rather than the actual son of union master Edwin Murrant. The Breaker's morals and beliefs are dubious for a man held in high regard. He confessed and showed little remorse to shooting the twelve Boer prisoners and Visser, believed but not proven responsible for the mutilation of Captain Hunt on August 5th, 1901.

  1. Explain, by reference to decided cases, how the courts have approached the requirement of ...

    Therefore, the fact that the victim jumped out of the vehicle could not be considered as being a novus actus intervenien, and so the defendant would still be held liable for the death. In Daley 1980, It was stated by Lord Keith that the prosecution had to establish that the

  2. Too Much Love, Fame and Hatred

    loathed each other, which ruled out the possibility of them working together. After all was almost too much for the force, a vital clue which could have perhaps helped the team in solving the bewildering death, skin of Josephine Molloy's was found in the nails of McKendry, meaning that the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work