• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, and assess its claim to prove that God exists.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, and assess its claim to prove that God exists. The Cosmological Argument was first proposed by the philosopher Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theological in which he outlined his five propositions for the existence of God. The Cosmological Argument argues from the existence of the world, and its perceived state of order, to the existence of a creator, God. The argument has encountered several challenges, most notably from fellow philosophers David Hume and Bertrand Russell, and various vies discussed by modern day scholars. The Cosmological Argument is an a posteriori based on experience and observable phenomena. It infers the existence of God from the existence of the cosmos, Greek word for universe. The Cosmological Argument seeks causes since, "The universe cannot account for its own existence". Aquinas first set out his theory of the unmoved mover as an argument for the existence of God. Aquinas believed that everything is moving or changing is moved or changed by something outside itself, therefore the instigator of the motion or change in a thing is also changing or in motion and so on. This process cannot go back infinatly, since then there would be no "First Mover". ...read more.

Middle

This is what everyone understands to be God. The philosopher F.C. Copleston supports Aquinas theory of God being an "uncauses cause" or First Cause. He argues that Aquinas was not speaking of a temporal first cause, rather an ontologically ultimate cause. Copleston draws attention to two different kinds of causes. The in fieri cause is one which causes an effect, and the in esse cause which sustains the being of that effect. In essense he is distinguishing that God is only the in fieri cause of the world, and a God who's existence os necessary, the in esse cause of the world. In these terms God is described as an ontologically ultimate cause, since it is his permanent existence that sustains our existence. This distinction clarifies Aquinas' argument of God being the uncaused cause. The Cosmological Argument has faced criticism for proving the existence of God. Nothing occurs without a sufficient reason for why it is, whenever we ask a question "why", we automatically presume there is an explanation. Looking for the reason for existence is not going to be part of continguent things. The sufficient reason for the world must be beyond this world. ...read more.

Conclusion

Kenny believed that "a body's velocity would remain unchanged unless some other force, such as friction, acted upon it." Kenny believes that it is possible for an object to be in one of two states, stationary or moving at a constant rat, without any external force acting upon it. This would appear to mean that Aquinas' statement that nothing moves itself is wrong, and so argues against the existence of God and the First Cause or Mover. Recent scientific theories and challenges argued by philosophers have begun to question whether God was the ultimate creator, responsible for the universe. Modern cosmology allows for an infinite past history of the universe since it is consistent with the universe since it is consistent with the evidence to have an infinite series of expanding and contracting universes. This is know as the Oscillating Universe Theory. If there was no starting point, then from any specific point in past time there is only a finite stretch that needs to be traversed to reach the present. Given that the universe had a beginning, some philosophers question whether God must be the cause. Even if God did start it, God could then cease to be. This is very far from the argument sustained in the Cosmological Argument, that God not only began the world but sustains it, and that without God things would cease to be. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Discuss the teleological argument for the existence of God. How viable is this argument?

    In the case of Paley, this designer is exactly like the people responsible for human artefacts. (5) The defender of the argument from design has no reason for denying that there may not be a whole 'gang of God's' working together to produce design in the universe.

  2. "If God made the world, then he must be absent without leave!" Write an ...

    This view is very interesting because it is amazing that every single human on this Earth has a different fingerprint. Hence, this means that the six billion people currently inhabiting the earth have a unique fingerprint. However, as if that was not fascinating enough, the thing is, that ever since it has been recorded, everyone has had a different fingerprint.

  1. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    > The universe has a beginning of its existence. Therefore > The universe has a cause of its existence. > If the universe has a cause of its existence then that cause is God.

  2. What does St. Thomas Aquinas consider to be the nature and methodology of the ...

    As previously noted, Gods divine plan for us is only known t himself. This would appear to be a good point to start theology as a science! Therefore as with other sciences which have something seen and tangible to start the enquiry with theology we have something through faith that is there, shown to us through divine revelation and love.

  1. Using Inductive and Deductive arguments, is it possible to prove the existence of God?

    God exists only in human minds or in reality 4. If God exists in human minds, He is not as great as a being that exists in reality 5. Therefore, God must exist in reality However, it could be argued that the Ontological argument is not valid is it does not have true premises.

  2. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    Hume's points mean that the design argument does fail to prove the existence of God, as these points could not be satisfactorily answered. Another critic of the teleological argument was John Stuart Mill. While agreeing that the idea may point towards the possibility of the existence of a God, but

  1. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    The next inductive argument is the argument for design. The argument for design is simplified by an analogy of a watch. Watches are very complex pieces of machinery, and it is because of this complexity that we come to believe that it must have been designed and moreover designed for a purpose.

  2. Is there enough Evidence of Religious Experience to Prove the Existence of God?

    God could help him and he wanted his help. He was convinced it would lead him to a different way of life. These are four very specific cases of religious experience. But now I am going to take on a rather broader approach.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work