• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, and assess its claim to prove that God exists.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, and assess its claim to prove that God exists. The Cosmological Argument was first proposed by the philosopher Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theological in which he outlined his five propositions for the existence of God. The Cosmological Argument argues from the existence of the world, and its perceived state of order, to the existence of a creator, God. The argument has encountered several challenges, most notably from fellow philosophers David Hume and Bertrand Russell, and various vies discussed by modern day scholars. The Cosmological Argument is an a posteriori based on experience and observable phenomena. It infers the existence of God from the existence of the cosmos, Greek word for universe. The Cosmological Argument seeks causes since, "The universe cannot account for its own existence". Aquinas first set out his theory of the unmoved mover as an argument for the existence of God. Aquinas believed that everything is moving or changing is moved or changed by something outside itself, therefore the instigator of the motion or change in a thing is also changing or in motion and so on. This process cannot go back infinatly, since then there would be no "First Mover". ...read more.

Middle

This is what everyone understands to be God. The philosopher F.C. Copleston supports Aquinas theory of God being an "uncauses cause" or First Cause. He argues that Aquinas was not speaking of a temporal first cause, rather an ontologically ultimate cause. Copleston draws attention to two different kinds of causes. The in fieri cause is one which causes an effect, and the in esse cause which sustains the being of that effect. In essense he is distinguishing that God is only the in fieri cause of the world, and a God who's existence os necessary, the in esse cause of the world. In these terms God is described as an ontologically ultimate cause, since it is his permanent existence that sustains our existence. This distinction clarifies Aquinas' argument of God being the uncaused cause. The Cosmological Argument has faced criticism for proving the existence of God. Nothing occurs without a sufficient reason for why it is, whenever we ask a question "why", we automatically presume there is an explanation. Looking for the reason for existence is not going to be part of continguent things. The sufficient reason for the world must be beyond this world. ...read more.

Conclusion

Kenny believed that "a body's velocity would remain unchanged unless some other force, such as friction, acted upon it." Kenny believes that it is possible for an object to be in one of two states, stationary or moving at a constant rat, without any external force acting upon it. This would appear to mean that Aquinas' statement that nothing moves itself is wrong, and so argues against the existence of God and the First Cause or Mover. Recent scientific theories and challenges argued by philosophers have begun to question whether God was the ultimate creator, responsible for the universe. Modern cosmology allows for an infinite past history of the universe since it is consistent with the universe since it is consistent with the evidence to have an infinite series of expanding and contracting universes. This is know as the Oscillating Universe Theory. If there was no starting point, then from any specific point in past time there is only a finite stretch that needs to be traversed to reach the present. Given that the universe had a beginning, some philosophers question whether God must be the cause. Even if God did start it, God could then cease to be. This is very far from the argument sustained in the Cosmological Argument, that God not only began the world but sustains it, and that without God things would cease to be. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Discuss the teleological argument for the existence of God. How viable is this argument?

    In the case of Paley, this designer is exactly like the people responsible for human artefacts. (5) The defender of the argument from design has no reason for denying that there may not be a whole 'gang of God's' working together to produce design in the universe.

  2. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    (Darwin, Origin of Species, 1859) His ideas were even more radical than those of Hume, as they suggested that God did not exist at all, and everything was all part of evolution. This theory is backed up by Richard Dawkins who rejects any idea of design in the world, and

  1. "If God made the world, then he must be absent without leave!" Write an ...

    This view is very interesting because it is amazing that every single human on this Earth has a different fingerprint. Hence, this means that the six billion people currently inhabiting the earth have a unique fingerprint. However, as if that was not fascinating enough, the thing is, that ever since it has been recorded, everyone has had a different fingerprint.

  2. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    > God exists. This is the kalam argument summarized in all its premises; it is arguing that nothing comes into existence without being caused like Aquinas's first way, and also points out that there cannot be an infinite chain of movers, causes or necessary beings and all need an first explanation.

  1. How far does Swinburne's argument for the existence of God based on religious experience ...

    These were then summarised well by Caroline Franks Davis. One of the challenges put forward is; if the subject 'S' was unreliable an example of this may be someone was known to be a liar or a cheater, if similar perceptions are shown to be false for example if the

  2. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    ever be observed by us and therefore a non-conscious being, in this case God, must have been present to have created it and eventually us. Paley also used the analogy of the rock in a field. By this he meant that if you were to find a rock in a

  1. Can the Existence of God be proven?

    As if you were to believe in God then he may be the driving force behind evolution. Evolution then isn't the strongest argument against proving the existence of God. Although these arguments are arguing about the Christian God, the fact that there are contradictions among different religions doesn't support the existence of one God.

  2. Is there enough Evidence of Religious Experience to Prove the Existence of God?

    God could help him and he wanted his help. He was convinced it would lead him to a different way of life. These are four very specific cases of religious experience. But now I am going to take on a rather broader approach.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work