• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the main features of Jeremy Bentham's guide to making moral decisions.

Extracts from this document...


Mandip Hare 19th September 2003 (Q1) Outline the main features of Jeremy Bentham's guide to making moral decisions. Jeremy Bentham set out the theory of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that looks to provide 'the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.' It is based of the 'Principle of Utility', which is that in any situation that there is moral decision to be made, one should decide on the outcome which will produce the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number. The 'Principle of Utility' is a form of hedonistic utilitarianism. Bentham believed in this. The word hedonism originally comes from the Greek word hedone, which means pleasure. A hedonist believes that pleasure is the most important thing in life. Any action, which increases pleasure, is right and one that increases pain is wrong. In Bentham's utilitarianism the basic principle that judged goodness or badness of an action was an action that produced the greatest sum of pleasure and the least sum of pain. This formed a main feature of Bentham's guide to making moral decisions. A way of measuring and defining pain was needed. Bentham formed the Hedonic calculus. This was supposedly a scientific measure of pain. He produced seven criteria to measure pleasure and pain. These were intensity, duration, certainty, extent, remoteness, richness and purity. Bentham believed that these factors should be taken into consideration when making a moral decision, which would affect the happiness of a community. ...read more.


The only problem is that the hospital is extremely short staffed and only has one doctor available. Who should the doctor attend to? A Benthamite would have to apply the hedonic calculus. Attending to the mother would result in the greatest happiness, as three lives would be saved. There is also a greater richness and purity of saving a young ones life who has a likelihood of a long and happy life ahead. There is more pleasure generated as three peoples lives have been saved. There is a clear likelihood that the duration and extent of pleasure experienced by the mother and children will be greater than the pleasure of saving one elderly life. This is because duration of the elderly life is uncertain and also the women has lived the majority her life ('the good innings argument'). The utilitarian doctor has decided to help the mother because there will be greater years of pleasure experienced by her and her children. But the question is, is it possible to measure pleasure in the number of years, and who will do the measuring? Another problem is that the hedonic calculus is relying on the doctors' predictions. The mother and her twins may not be happy. The twins may be involved in a serious car crash, which results in them being severely disabled and reliant on hospital care. This will result in pain for the twin's family and friends in the long term. ...read more.


However some believers feel that Bentham's ideas were perfectly adequate. He believed in Egalitarianism- all are entitled to happiness. This is a key aspect of utilitarianism. Another key aspect of utilitarianism is the teleological theory. This is a central part of utilitarianism and there would be no improvements needed. Religious believers would favour utilitarianism because Jesus' teachings by claiming that to love your neighbour as yourself constitutes 'the ideal perfection of utilitarian morality.' To conclude it is inevitable that religious believers and utilitarianism would consider Bentham's ideas inadequate because he had lost the idea that certain pleasures did not always stay pleasurable. Utilitarianism depends our ability to know what gives other people happiness. This is changing constantly. Others may find the whole idea of utilitarianism inadequate to some extent. Greatest happiness for the greatest number is the core for utilitarianism thought, but as philosopher W.D Ross pointed out we cannot rely on just one equation for every situation, 'life's ethical dilemmas cannot be reduced to a pre packaged, predictive calculus which balances outcomes.' For example, if you were a doctor and had to save one person out of your daughter or another doctor who had the cure to AIDS, who would you save? According to the greatest happiness for the greatest number you would save the doctor. Personally however you would want to save your daughter, after all she is your own flesh and blood. Ross believes in the prima-facie duty, which are the most important duties and the ones that should be carried out. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain how Aristotle and Alasdair Macintyre applied Virtue Theory to moral decision making?

    it is the individual of good character who stands the best chance to determine the most ethical course of action. This is not to say that a virtuous individual does not appeal to utility or rules to determine what the right answer is.

  2. Kantians believe promises should always be kept even if breaking brings about benefits because ...

    That is respect if Kantian believes the promise he or she has made is disrespectful to others he or she will break that promise. For example, let say Kantian has made a promise to collect money for his church and has to do this by going from house to house asking for donations.

  1. Explain how a Hindu marriage service might guide a couple in their married life?

    In Hinduism divorce happens when the dharma of the couple have not been fulfilled, because according to the doctrine everyone his or her own dharma to follow, and the dharma of the husband is different to the dharma of the wife.

  2. "Miller's plays show is that happiness can only be achieved by making moral compromises" ...

    "A batch comes out with a crack...that happens, that's the business". This therefore shows that in Miller's play, in terms of Joe and Joe's values, happiness can only be achieved by making moral compromises. This idea is again shown by Miller by the fact that the Keller's appear to be fairly wealthy.

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    If life is God's gift then it would be blasphemous to waste it, or for another human being to take it away. Also, if life is God's gift, then abortion is not the only area where we must turn to divine guidance as to what we do, if life is

  2. "Medical research in the U.K. is being suffocated by excessive governance and ethical review".

    Research governance framework for health and social care. London: DoH, 2001. 4 Cave E, Holm S. New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest. Journal of medical ethics 2002; 28: 318 5 See Penn ZJ, Steer PJ. Local research ethics committees; hindrance or help?

  1. Discuss critically the claim that Freewill and Determinism are incompatible

    These people are known as libertarians (or incompatibilitists). Libertarians believe that we are free to act, and are morally responsible for those actions. They believe that we are not duty-bound to act by forces outside of our moral consciousness. Moral actions are not chance, or random events, but result from the values and characteristics of the moral agent.

  2. Should our moral beliefs be based on the utilitarian principle of securing the greatest ...

    Many people often use this moral principle in making daily decisions. When people are asked to explain why they feel that they have a moral duty to make a decision, or perform some action, it is often been answered as they pointed out that there will be benefit come out from it, or the harm can be prevented.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work