• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the ontological arguments and consider how successful they are, as proofs of God's existence'

Extracts from this document...


A.S Philosophy Luke Hyde Q. 'Outline the ontological arguments and consider how successful they are, as proofs of God's existence'. The ontological argument is a perfect example of a priori argument. For example, it uses logic to prove an initial definition to be correct. The term refers to a whole series of arguments within a thought. The arguments aim is to prove God's existence from the meaning of the word God. St Anselm was the man who suggested that deductive reasoning could be used to prove God's existence - a priory argument. The ontological argument is a rationalist argument. A rationalist argument is a view that true knowledge of the external world does not come through experience. It is through reason alone, without reference to the external world, that the truth is known. The argument is also deductive. It uses a method of reasoning by logical stages to reach a conclusion. Each philosopher who contributed to the argument though up 'logical stages', which lead to a final conclusion. The Ontological argument can be separated down to three stages. The first being about the definition of God as that than which no greater can be conceived, and its suggestions. The second being the logicality of God not existing at all, and finally why 'the fool' believes that which is impossible, to be true. ...read more.


His main point was that there is a great distinction between concepts and objects, words and things. He also questioned what the word 'God' actually meant, and as a result of that, if the word had any application. However despite the criticism, some thought differently and agreed with Anselm's arguments. One was a man called Liebniz, who said that God must exist, due to the fact that some one who possesses all perfection not to exist, would be meaningless and worthless. Rene Descartes was the second contributor to the 'Classical Ontological argument'. After reading Anselm's views and beliefs, he developed them to stating that God was a 'supremely perfect being' , as the main indicate for his argument. Descartes concluding by declaring that God must exist, because existence is a predicate of a perfect being. He went on to say that it is utterly illogical to try to think of an non-existing God. Just like Anselm, Descartes received harsh criticism relating to his views. One man who in particular opposed his beliefs was a man called Immanuel Kant. This was because he believed 'existence is not a predicament'. For example saying someone exists doesn't tell anyone anything about the subject. Kant concluded that for a predicament to be true, it must give information about the subject, in this context, God. ...read more.


In conclusion, Plantinga states that for someone to be maximally great a being only has to be present in every possible world, and that maximal greatness entails maximal excellence. Therefore, there is a possible world in which there is a being that is maximally great, and that it has maximal excellence, equalling that there is in fact a God. Brian Davies, claimed that a being with maximal excellence is possible, and therefore it is possible that such a being exists in our world, but this being doesn't necessarily have to exist. In conclusion, from Plantinga's evidence, the conclusion is that maximal existence is possible, and therefore God's existence is possible, and not actual. After reviewing the comments of the four philosophers about there views of the Ontological argument and the existence of God, it seems that that the argument is generally unsuccessful. One reason why this could be is because the definitions are extremely limited and restricted. They don't look into the situation into enough detail to make the comments seem extremely believable. Also, the task of actually defining God is especially difficult, due to the fact that we are only limited to human terms to describe God, which proves to be inadequate. Due to the absolute colossal size and magnificence of God, it is a truly impossible task to describe the details of him, due to the lack of details we currently have. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Ontological Argument - Describe and explain the ontological argument for the existence ...

    This may not be the only (or best) way of showing God to someone, but perhaps this is a view that some people will be able to use to help their justification of belief in God. Unlike the other arguments for God's existence, the ontological argument is an a priori proof.

  2. "Discuss critically religious and secular ethical arguments about environmental issues"

    Augustine described natural evil as the punishment for sin and moral evil. There are of course, many other religions besides Christianity. The Quran, the holy book of Islam, teaches that "God has created every animal from water..." (Chapter 24 'Light', Verse 45).

  1. Using Inductive and Deductive arguments, is it possible to prove the existence of God?

    The argument is set out like so: (1) Everything that exists has a cause of its existence. (2) The universe exists. Therefore: (3) The universe has a cause of its existence. (4) If the universe has a cause of its existence, then that cause is God. Therefore: (5) God exists.

  2. Free essay

    1.) Outline and explain the main points of teleological arguments for the existence of ...

    This set the stage for Aquinas in the 13th Century, who was much more thoroughly Aristotlean and a posteriori [where the proof of the statement relies on external evidence] than his predecessors. Aquinas makes a specific, compact version of the teleological argument in his Summa Theologiae, the fifth of his

  1. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    No being which is not God could be the cause of my idea of God. There is a cause for my idea of God. Therefore, the cause of my idea of God must not be a being which is not God.

  2. God- The Great Geometer

    Kepler wondered why only six? Why not twenty or a hundred? (he was that convinced that everything in nature, created by god must have a mathematical link and a symmetry) Why did they have the spacing between their orbits that Copernicus deduced?

  1. Does God Exist?

    Therefore, to say that God can be thought not to exist if the definition of God is "that than which none greater can be conceived" contradicts the previous statement and this indicates that God necessarily exists. Anslem suggested that God must be a necessary being (He must exist).

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    This argument demonstrates that things come into existence because an external object or thing has caused them to, in a succession of event. However, this succession of events cannot go back to the beginning of time, therefore there must have been a necessary being outside of time and place, that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work