• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the various forms of the cosmological argument for the existence of God

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A1 Outline the various forms of the cosmological argument for the existence of God The cosmological argument is a well established argument for the existence of God and it is also known as the first cause argument. The cosmological argument is based upon the belief that there is a first cause behind the existence of universe and this was God. It has taken many forms and in the past has been presented in many ways. So many philosophers have put their points across, philosophers like; Plato, Aquinas, Socrates, Hume, Kant and many more. The first person to put their point across was Plato. He argued that the power to produce the movements plausibly comes before the power to receive it and pass it on. In order for the movement to occur in the first place, there must be an uncaused cause to instigate the movement. He said this was the 'First Cause' or 'First Mover'. The most popular version was developed by the infamous St Thomas Aquinas; he developed the five ways to prove the existence of God. The first three of his five ways act as a proof to god's existence. The ways are motion, cause and contingency. The first way is based upon motion. According to Aquinas there must have been a first or a mover, which itself was unmoved. The Unmoved mover began the movement in everything without actually being moved. ...read more.

Middle

If the universe was created out of nothing then the beginning of the universe was the beginning of time. Many objections in the past and currently have been raised against the cosmological argument. One of the major objections to the argument is the submission that infinity is impossible and that the universe had a beginning. Many philosophers - past and present, point out that Aquinas and Craig contradict themselves when they reject the possibility of the infinite. Both Aquinas and Craig deny the infinite and yet argue that God is infinite. Believers of the argument point out that God is unique and that the laws of nature do not apply to God. In the five ways Anthony Kenny said that Aquinas's principle that nothing moves itself goes against the fact that people and animals move themselves. He stated that Newton's first law of motion, in which movement can be explained by a body's own sluggishness from previous motion, disapproves Aquinas's argument. It is possible for object to have uniform motion as well as to be in a state of rest. b) The strengths of the Cosmological Argument lie in both its simplicity and easily comprehensible concept that there cannot be an infinite number of causes to an event. Some arguments for God's existence require more thought and training in terms and concepts, but this argument is basic and simple. ...read more.

Conclusion

Such a question may be beyond reach of science and shows the point at which philosophy must take over. Effectively it labels the explanation for the existence of the Big Bang as 'God'. Conclusion: Like the teleological argument, the cosmological argument suffers from our uncertainty of whether or not the past, like the future, is infinite. If the past stretches back infinitely, then there never was a Prime Cause. If there have been an infinite number of causes in the past then logically there cannot have been a first cause. The argument, by itself, only seems to show the existence of a necessary being which is the cause of the universe. While this does include some key elements of the theistic conception of God, it obviously leaves out quite a few important ones. The conclusion is compatible with many views of God. So, even if it is successful, the cosmological argument hardly constitutes more than an entering wedge into the knowledge of God. If someone accepts the conclusion, the proper attitude for him to adopt is surely a desire to learn more about God. Brian Davies takes the position that the cosmological argument cannot stand alone as proof for the existence of God, and would have to be supported by other evidence. Immanuel Kant rejected the cosmological argument based on his theory that reason is too limited to know anything beyond human experience. However, he did argue that religion could be established as presupposed by the workings of morality in the human mind ("practical reason"). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    This necessary being was God. Aquinas argued the world was finite with his first argument and rubbished the assumption of infinity; he used the example of fire: when the fire is hot it changes wood from cold to hot, it follows a sequence, so if the world was infinite it would mean it would be

  2. What does it mean to say that God is 'necessary?'

    because without that there could be no other causes. He added that this cause must be a "being". Beings either exist or they don't. There is no reason to suppose that the world has to exist. But it does exist.

  1. "If God made the world, then he must be absent without leave!" Write an ...

    John was so convinced of the return of his perfect health once again, that he stopped taking his prescribed medicines, and converted to Christianity. Miraculously, when John awoke the next morning, he did not feel any pain, and there was no bleeding remaining on his body either.

  2. The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

    There must have been a neccessary being to bring everything else into existence. Aquinas argues that this neccessary being must have been God. According to the theory pf contingeny, if God did not exist, thatn nothing would exist as there would be no neccessary being to bring about the creation of the universe.

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    This statement is analytic but doesn't state anything new. 1 Even a] fool, when he hears of ... a being than which nothing greater can be conceived ... understands what he hears, and what he understands is in his understanding.... And assuredly that, than which nothing greater can be conceived, cannot exist in the understanding alone.

  2. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    'I have an idea of God. Everything which exists has a cause. Therefore, there is a cause of my idea of God. There is a cause of my idea of God. The cause of an effect must contain at least as much reality as the effect.

  1. Critique of Aquinas's cosmological argument - 3rd way(Contingency)

    This principle suggested by Leibniz states that "For any positive truth, there is some sufficient reason for it whether it be known or unknown" (Philosophy of Religion by Peter Cole(23). Therefore everything in the universe including the universe as a whole should have an adequate reason for existence.

  2. The Existence of God - questions and answers.

    ?Considering the evidence, everyone should be an agnostic? 1. Do you agree? Give reasons for your opinion (3) 2.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work