• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Personal Views on Evil and suffering

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Best Argument and the Worst Argument of Why God Allows People to Suffer Best Argument Although I disagree with this argument and do not think it is a good argument, because as an omniscience God, He should knows mankind are curious about anything, especially things that are about us so it is very hard to make ourselves believe in him until we know why we are suffering. Beside, 'We shouldn't ask why people suffer. Only God knows and He works in mysterious ways.' does not at all explain to us 'why God allows people to suffer'. However, I think it is the best argument out the all the other listed arguments as this is the only one on the list which does not contradicted the argument itself or prove God is either not omnibenevolence or not omnipotence. 'We suffer because God gives us a choice and sometimes humans misuse that choice.' for example, contradicted itself - no-one would chose to suffer yet many of us including Christians and Jews whom act according to the bible are suffering in the past and in today's world in various ways, e.g. the holocaust, illnesses... 'Suffering is a test. Suffering exists because it makes us better, stronger people' shows God is not omnipotence - if God is omnipotence, then he must be omniscience so he must know what kind of people we are without giving us such a test. ...read more.

Middle

'Suffering exists because humans have taken what God has given them and used for their own good and not for the good of humankind.' shows he is not omnipotence and omnibenevolence for the same reason as above - he should be able to make all human care for each other if he is really omnipotence and if he is at all loving, he would not want to see, never mind to make one human suffer as the consequence of the other human being selfish which is what is happening now in the world. On the other hand, even though the argument, 'We shouldn't ask why people suffer. Only God knows and He works in mysterious ways' does not explain 'why God allows people to suffer', it does not contradicted itself or prove God is not omnipotence or omnibenevolence. Therefore, I think it is the best argument of all listed though I do not think it is a good argument nor do I agree with it. Worst Argument For more than once, the Bible states or hint that the world is ruled by devil for a while. During the 40 days and night in the wildness, the devil once tried to tempted Jesus by '...taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world...' ...read more.

Conclusion

sense of benevolence so do not care his people suffering as long as he can prove to Satan how powerful he is and He rules the best. And if God let Satan make us suffer for the second reason, he is not only not at all benevolence, but also not omnipotence - he does not have any other way of proving it to Satan other that to let him make us suffer. Therefore, I think 'Suffering happens because of Satan, not because of God' is the worst argument of all as it not only not be able to explain why the 'omnibenevolence' and 'omnipotence' God allows people to suffer but led us to think God is either lying in the bible: '...the hand of the LORD is powerful'(Joshua 4 verse 24) and in fact, he is not able to prevent his people for suffering because of Satan or He is a selfish God who do not care his people suffering as long as he can prove to Satan how powerful he is which means he is definitely not omnibenevolence. And if so this argument led us back to the beginning - suffering is because of God as well as Satan since God allows him to make us suffer while can avoid it. RS Kathy Liu L5W 08/12/2008 The Best Argument and the Worst Argument of Why God Allows People to Suffer ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Is God really there? If he is, does he care? And if he does, ...

    He does, however, support God's morals in that he believes that free will could not (and would not) exist without the perseverance of evil, as many evil occurrences are a result of people acting through their own free will and without.

  2. Good and Evil

    Also in the Bible the devil is said to be able to adopt a spirit form, reside inside a person and influence their thoughts and behaviour. There are two kinds of evil; natural evil and moral evil. Natural evil is not a supernatural creature preventing natural good, it is all

  1. T H E C O S M O L O G ...

    6. An infinite series is possible. If this is true, then there need be no sufficient reason and no end to the regress of justification. 7. There is no way of establishing the principle of causality (see discussion of this point under Ockham above). KANT's CRITICISMS ================== Kant's key criticism (although there are a number)

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Evaluate the design argument (17) The design argument has many strengths and weaknesses. The argument primarily appeals to those who already believe in God and have an objective understanding of laws but the problem is to do with atheists or those who do not accept objective law.

  1. Good and Evil

    There are times, of course, when these two kinds of evil are intermingled, for example when flooding results in loss of human life due to poor planning or poorly constructed buildings. Some psychiatrists believe that evil comes from within human nature, and under its power normal individuals can be seen

  2. The Kingdoms of God.

    The seed on rocky ground represented people that take notice of gods message, but abandon it as soon as something better arises. The seed that fell among the thorns represented the people who love money more than gods message. The seed on good soil means people that take notice of

  1. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    Hume says there isn't necessarily any such sign. PHILO'S CONCLUSION IS THAT WE SHOULD SUSPEND JUDGEMENT ON THE QUESTION OF WHETHER THERE IS A GOD - there is, he claims, no firm evidence for or against. Hume's arguments were supported by the work of Charles Darwin and have effectively destroyed the traditional formulations of the teleological argument, qua purpose.

  2. The Holocaust - personal response to Anne Frank's diary and the problem of evil ...

    Jews often use words to describe Yahweh, such as Creator, Father, Sustainer, Protector and Fair. But surely it is not fair or just, for a father to kill 6 million of his children? If Yahweh was a father, then he was one abusive one too.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work