• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Philosophy - teleological argument.

Extracts from this document...


AS Philosophy a) Briefly explain what is meant when an argument is described as 'teleological' This argument is referred to as the design argument. This argument compared to the ontological is simpler and appeals to our common sense more. It is an argument that gathers evidence, and uses our experience of things from everyday life. The word teleological comes from the Greek word telos, which means 'end' or 'purpose'. This means that we are attempting to prove that God designed this world, or that there is a designer. This necessarily doesn't mean that the designer is also the creator. b) Outline and illustrate how the teleological argument for the existence of God uses analogy. William Paley and David Hume both use analogy for their versions of the teleological argument. Paley described a scene where an individual walked across a beach and finds a stone. ...read more.


Hume criticises Paley's argument saying that we cannot compare man made artefacts to the universe. David Hume had actually criticized this argument before Paley set it out. Hume asks that if the world is complex it must be created by a complex mind; but who created such a mind. In other words, why do we have to stop this search for explanations at God? Why not carry on to the creator of God and so on. His second criticism was that the world contained evil. If we argue from the facts in the world in order to arrive at God's existence; we end up with at least a God who is not good and who is not powerful enough to bring his intentions about. Hume suggests a third point. Why believe in one God as creator and not many? ...read more.


The logical positivists say that the teleological argument does not fulfil the criteria for meaningful language because is cannot be checked. We make our conclusions about a topic due to research and experimentation, in this case we are not able to look from an outside view and make judgements. So how are we able to justify the teleological argument as a logical theory? Logical positivists also say that until we see what the world would look like if it wasn't designed, we cannot claim that it is designed. Personal life experiences can also influence ones judgment on the teleological argument. Our own worldly experiences may influence our beliefs or our beliefs may influence our worldly experiences. Could there be a difference in the way the world is seen by a believer and a non-believer? A believer may see a miracle of God in the sky proving Gods existence to him whereas a non-believer looking at the same sky may see the beauty of nature. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Lebiniz accepted the cosmological argument because he believed that it had 'sufficient reason' for the universe to exist and that God was the first cause upon which everything depends. However he did not accept the universe was uncaused, rejecting an infinite universe because it did not have a satisfactory explanation.

  2. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    So far they are more successful in that they have not been criticised so much but they had an original argument plus original criticisms to construct their arguments from. However, an argument that is constructed purely by using logic and that is no way empirical is not going to be

  1. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    believing seems to be unthinkable without seeing, without direct physical evidence and verification. For Thomas it was not sufficient evidence for belief by hearing that Jesus had risen from his fellow disciples and friends. The Toronto blessing is a modern example of a corporate religious experience.

  2. The Teleological Argument

    Astronomer Fred Hoyle said that the likelihood of the conditions necessary for life coming about by chance were akin to a hurricane sweeping through a scrap yard and assembling a Boeing 747.

  1. The Ontological Argument.

    fool can answer, "When did I say that such a being, namely one greater than all others, actually exists, thus allowing you to proceed from there to argue that it so really exists that its very non-existence is inconceivable?" This is a further elucidation of the points Gaunilio raised earlier.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    Swinburne's argument instantiates the following invalid argument-form: (1) Fx is logically possible (i.e. it is logically possible for x to possess the property F). (2) C is a necessary condition of Fx. (3) x exists. (4) Therefore, C exists. The fact that Swinburne's argument has this form becomes clear if we state his argument as follows: (1A)

  1. Asses Sartre's COntribution Toward the philosophy of freedom

    A sceptic of existentialism may blame or family or friends for influencing our decisions and possibly resulting in our unhappiness however and existentialist would answer that it is our fault for choosing to let ourselves be influenced. People who lead their lives "trying to get along" would be deemed by

  2. Willam Paley'sVersion of the Teleological Argument

    borders, therefore showing there is order and regularity evident in the universe, such as the rotation of the planets and natural laws. Philosophers, such as Paley come to the conclusion that this could not have occurred by random chance. To sum up it is the argument that states the universe appears to be behaving in accordance with order or rule.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work