• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Philosophy - teleological argument.

Extracts from this document...


AS Philosophy a) Briefly explain what is meant when an argument is described as 'teleological' This argument is referred to as the design argument. This argument compared to the ontological is simpler and appeals to our common sense more. It is an argument that gathers evidence, and uses our experience of things from everyday life. The word teleological comes from the Greek word telos, which means 'end' or 'purpose'. This means that we are attempting to prove that God designed this world, or that there is a designer. This necessarily doesn't mean that the designer is also the creator. b) Outline and illustrate how the teleological argument for the existence of God uses analogy. William Paley and David Hume both use analogy for their versions of the teleological argument. Paley described a scene where an individual walked across a beach and finds a stone. ...read more.


Hume criticises Paley's argument saying that we cannot compare man made artefacts to the universe. David Hume had actually criticized this argument before Paley set it out. Hume asks that if the world is complex it must be created by a complex mind; but who created such a mind. In other words, why do we have to stop this search for explanations at God? Why not carry on to the creator of God and so on. His second criticism was that the world contained evil. If we argue from the facts in the world in order to arrive at God's existence; we end up with at least a God who is not good and who is not powerful enough to bring his intentions about. Hume suggests a third point. Why believe in one God as creator and not many? ...read more.


The logical positivists say that the teleological argument does not fulfil the criteria for meaningful language because is cannot be checked. We make our conclusions about a topic due to research and experimentation, in this case we are not able to look from an outside view and make judgements. So how are we able to justify the teleological argument as a logical theory? Logical positivists also say that until we see what the world would look like if it wasn't designed, we cannot claim that it is designed. Personal life experiences can also influence ones judgment on the teleological argument. Our own worldly experiences may influence our beliefs or our beliefs may influence our worldly experiences. Could there be a difference in the way the world is seen by a believer and a non-believer? A believer may see a miracle of God in the sky proving Gods existence to him whereas a non-believer looking at the same sky may see the beauty of nature. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    On the basis of Swinburne's principal of credulity we must accept that the experience of Saul's conversion, as recorded in the bible, is something that has a historical basis. The implication here is that we also have to assume that the experience has been reliably recorded by the author of

  2. The Teleological Argument.

    A.E Taylor states 'nature reveals an anticipatory design that chance evolution cannot account for. For example, the body's need for the oxygen and the bodily membranes it anticipate us inhaling oxygen.' He also describes how insects deposit their eggs in a place where the newly born will be able to find food relatively easily.

  1. Willam Paley'sVersion of the Teleological Argument

    The universe is compared to a man-made machine, in which a designer fits the parts together in a certain way for a specific purpose. An example given is of an over - head projector, where the parts are fitted together in order to produce sound and receive pictures.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    The principle Swinburne is appealing to is (1) The more simple an existent is, the more likely it is to exist unexplained. I believe, however, that even if we grant Swinburne this and other of his premises it can be shown that considerations of simplicity support atheism rather than theism.

  1. The design argument for the existence of God (also called the teleological argument).

    Paley is saying that if we were to come across a watch, we would conclude that the parts fitted together for a purpose had not come into existence by chance. An intelligent person would infer a designer of the watch.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    In order for this change to take place actuality is required. If not the object would have to initiate change itself, which is a logical impossibility. This is an impossibility because it would mean that the wood would be both potential and actual at the same time, how can wood make itself hot if it is hot already?

  1. The Teleological Argument

    Firstly, the watchmaker analogy is very good as it is easy to comprehend and understand. Also, a systematic approach has been taken. By this I mean that we start with the end product, the universe or watch, and work our way backwards.

  2. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    Russell argues that people are confusing first and second order predicates; so while the cow has first order predicates such as hoofs and ears (material properties), the unicorn only has second order predicates ( conceptual properties). So, he argued that God can only be thought of in terms of second order predicates.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work