• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Philosophy - teleological argument.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

AS Philosophy a) Briefly explain what is meant when an argument is described as 'teleological' This argument is referred to as the design argument. This argument compared to the ontological is simpler and appeals to our common sense more. It is an argument that gathers evidence, and uses our experience of things from everyday life. The word teleological comes from the Greek word telos, which means 'end' or 'purpose'. This means that we are attempting to prove that God designed this world, or that there is a designer. This necessarily doesn't mean that the designer is also the creator. b) Outline and illustrate how the teleological argument for the existence of God uses analogy. William Paley and David Hume both use analogy for their versions of the teleological argument. Paley described a scene where an individual walked across a beach and finds a stone. ...read more.

Middle

Hume criticises Paley's argument saying that we cannot compare man made artefacts to the universe. David Hume had actually criticized this argument before Paley set it out. Hume asks that if the world is complex it must be created by a complex mind; but who created such a mind. In other words, why do we have to stop this search for explanations at God? Why not carry on to the creator of God and so on. His second criticism was that the world contained evil. If we argue from the facts in the world in order to arrive at God's existence; we end up with at least a God who is not good and who is not powerful enough to bring his intentions about. Hume suggests a third point. Why believe in one God as creator and not many? ...read more.

Conclusion

The logical positivists say that the teleological argument does not fulfil the criteria for meaningful language because is cannot be checked. We make our conclusions about a topic due to research and experimentation, in this case we are not able to look from an outside view and make judgements. So how are we able to justify the teleological argument as a logical theory? Logical positivists also say that until we see what the world would look like if it wasn't designed, we cannot claim that it is designed. Personal life experiences can also influence ones judgment on the teleological argument. Our own worldly experiences may influence our beliefs or our beliefs may influence our worldly experiences. Could there be a difference in the way the world is seen by a believer and a non-believer? A believer may see a miracle of God in the sky proving Gods existence to him whereas a non-believer looking at the same sky may see the beauty of nature. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    So far they are more successful in that they have not been criticised so much but they had an original argument plus original criticisms to construct their arguments from. However, an argument that is constructed purely by using logic and that is no way empirical is not going to be

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Supporters of the Kalam argument argue that it was a deliberate action of God because the rules of nature have existed since the beginning of time, it could not have possibly been the result of a spontaneous event, and it must be because of God.

  1. The Teleological Argument

    Astronomer Fred Hoyle said that the likelihood of the conditions necessary for life coming about by chance were akin to a hurricane sweeping through a scrap yard and assembling a Boeing 747.

  2. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    This leads me on to talk about doubting Thomas; Thomas doubts the resurrection of Jesus and demands to feel Jesus' wounds before being convinced - 'Unless I see the mark of the nails in his hands, and put my finger in the mark of the nails and my hand in his side, I will not believe.'(John 20.25)

  1. The Ontological Argument.

    generic knowledge by which I know what a man is or what men are like ... But when I hear someone say "God" or "something greater than everything else" I cannot think of it as I thought of that nonexistent man, for I was able to think of the latter

  2. The Teleological Argument.

    There are two options that the passenger would think about in reasoning why the stones got there. The first option is that the rocks must have simply rolled into that position. The other option would be that some other intelligent source position the rocks in such a way to give those on the train a message.'

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    This expectation is in line with big bang cosmologists' representation of the early stages of the universe, for these states are thought to be maximally chaotic (involving complete entropy). The singularity emitted particles with random microstates, and this resulted in an over-all macrostate of thermal equilibrium.

  2. Asses Sartre's COntribution Toward the philosophy of freedom

    Sartre's existential claim that existence precedes essence literally means that as humans we exist without an essence or blue-print to our lives. With this phrase Sartre argues that there is no such thing as a nature of man, instead we are born, not of our own making, but thrown in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work