• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

" Previous generations thought they knew what was true and what was right. We know today that they were often wrong. The old authorities have lost their authority. Nothing is certain anymore."(

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

" Previous generations thought they knew what was true and what was right. We know today that they were often wrong. The old authorities have lost their authority. Nothing is certain anymore." (a) Outline some textual, religious, ethical, or philosophical issues from your studies in which traditional views are challenged by modern views. (b) Examine and assess the traditional and modern views on one of these issues with reference to the above claim. a). Outline some textual, religious, ethical or philosophical issues from your studies in which traditional views are challenged by modern views. a). In the early 1950's, questions like "Does God really exist?" weren't even thought of. Theories such as Evolution or The Big Bang would have been considered as just a silly made up story or a pack of lies. Why? People in the 1950s didn't have the technology and scientific equipment to theorise what we know today. They only knew what was provided for them at the time. God was real, we were all created by an all powerful, loving and knowing God, and the world was a result of his divine creation. Today we have theories, beliefs and knowledge that some of the things previous generations thought they knew were right may in fact not have been so. ...read more.

Middle

Seems to suggest to me the morality of previous generations. The issues of abortion or marriage perhaps. When people were married it was a commitment not to be taken lightly, and the authorities at the time made sure everyone was clear on that fact. Marriage was a bind, a bond to another person that really meant something back then. The vows were to be taken very seriously..."till death do us part". God made woman for man in the beginning and if you chose not to marry you were considered to be abusing that gift from God. Abortion was wrong, Life was sacred, a gift and one that should not be destroyed. If a young man made a young woman pregnant, he was expected to face his responsibilities like a man and marry the girl, for it was very wrong in those times to be with child and not be married. I wouldn't necessarily say that these views were wrong but perhaps people were scared of what the consequences would be if they didn't follow society or more importantly follow the teachings and sayings of Jesus as it says in the Bible. For example Deuteronomy chapter 22 verse 13-30 talks about the way things should be in marriage and divorce and sex before marriage was considered wrong by the lord, and so that is why people from earlier generations believed in these morals. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Design Argument then fights back by suggesting that the world was not created by the Big Bang or Evolution and the survival of the fittest, just because of the evidence that we see around us. The world that we live in today has great beauty and almost design and so theists believe that an explosion or anything else, other than a divine creator, couldn't have possibly created such a beautiful world. David Hume, in his dialogues concerning Natural religion 1779, said that if the human experience of design were valid, the design argument would prove that the universe has a designer. All these views although they haven't been around very long, seem to suggest that the existence of a divine creator is tunnel vision and old fashioned. These modern views have challenged theology to its limit but I feel that no matter what new theories and views are thought of, there will always be room for beliefs in the existence of God because some people believe that God isn't meant to be explained or proved, for if it was what would we have to look forward to. The existence of heaven and hell would be proved and no one would have the mysterious quality in their lives anymore. Some things just aren't meant to be explained or proved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. What are the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain", and is ...

    By this he means since we do not understand a topic or theory from our assumptions made we can make a personal justification. I am certain that if I do not do well in my assessments my parents will be disappointed.

  2. 'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

    Richard Swinbourne appeals to the same argument: "If we can explain the many bits of the universe by one simple being which keeps them in existence, we should do so-even if inevitably we cannot explain the existence of that simple being". (Is there a God? p.49) However, Stuart Brown (p.77)

  1. Corporate religious experiences such as the Toronto blessing tell us nothing about god. Discuss

    Many of the Christians would say that the bible is the word of God, but with all the errors and human literature mistakes, the bible would show that it was written by humans, therefore how can a book that

  2. Living In a Plural Society.

    However, it is thought that as a person matures he can grow closer to the ideal of full renunciation of the personality. Thus, pursuit of wealth and love of the opposite sex are considered proper to certain stages of life, but when people grow old they often leave behind their worldly possessions to pursue the life of a wandering monk.

  1. corporate religious experience such as the toronto blessing tell us nothing about god

    Around 4 million Christians have 'experienced the blessing' at Toronto (in a building that can now accommodate 3,500) and millions more have been affected by the migration of the movement to various places.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    However Davis has contested this idea because sometimes it is never illogical to aim for something outside of our reach because it helps us to better ourselves such as an A in a philosophy exam. Even if one accepts all of these premises of the moral argument, it could never be argued that this proves the existence of God.

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    and perfectly homogeneous (matter is evenly distributed). If we apply to Einstein's equation a metric that describes a perfectly isotropic and homogeneous universe, the Friedmann solutions are obtained, which in a simplified form read -3*(acceleration of expansion or deceleration of contraction of the universe)

  2. John Milton's Paradise Lost is an Epic biblical poem with 12 sections, the first ...

    He is a great military leader and capable of composing truly rowsing speeches notwithstanding the fact that he uses high words which although they sound good, have no true substance to them. Interestingly, although there is a full, celebrated and valorized description of Satan's presence, there is no comparison with

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work