• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

" Previous generations thought they knew what was true and what was right. We know today that they were often wrong. The old authorities have lost their authority. Nothing is certain anymore."(

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

" Previous generations thought they knew what was true and what was right. We know today that they were often wrong. The old authorities have lost their authority. Nothing is certain anymore." (a) Outline some textual, religious, ethical, or philosophical issues from your studies in which traditional views are challenged by modern views. (b) Examine and assess the traditional and modern views on one of these issues with reference to the above claim. a). Outline some textual, religious, ethical or philosophical issues from your studies in which traditional views are challenged by modern views. a). In the early 1950's, questions like "Does God really exist?" weren't even thought of. Theories such as Evolution or The Big Bang would have been considered as just a silly made up story or a pack of lies. Why? People in the 1950s didn't have the technology and scientific equipment to theorise what we know today. They only knew what was provided for them at the time. God was real, we were all created by an all powerful, loving and knowing God, and the world was a result of his divine creation. Today we have theories, beliefs and knowledge that some of the things previous generations thought they knew were right may in fact not have been so. ...read more.

Middle

Seems to suggest to me the morality of previous generations. The issues of abortion or marriage perhaps. When people were married it was a commitment not to be taken lightly, and the authorities at the time made sure everyone was clear on that fact. Marriage was a bind, a bond to another person that really meant something back then. The vows were to be taken very seriously..."till death do us part". God made woman for man in the beginning and if you chose not to marry you were considered to be abusing that gift from God. Abortion was wrong, Life was sacred, a gift and one that should not be destroyed. If a young man made a young woman pregnant, he was expected to face his responsibilities like a man and marry the girl, for it was very wrong in those times to be with child and not be married. I wouldn't necessarily say that these views were wrong but perhaps people were scared of what the consequences would be if they didn't follow society or more importantly follow the teachings and sayings of Jesus as it says in the Bible. For example Deuteronomy chapter 22 verse 13-30 talks about the way things should be in marriage and divorce and sex before marriage was considered wrong by the lord, and so that is why people from earlier generations believed in these morals. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Design Argument then fights back by suggesting that the world was not created by the Big Bang or Evolution and the survival of the fittest, just because of the evidence that we see around us. The world that we live in today has great beauty and almost design and so theists believe that an explosion or anything else, other than a divine creator, couldn't have possibly created such a beautiful world. David Hume, in his dialogues concerning Natural religion 1779, said that if the human experience of design were valid, the design argument would prove that the universe has a designer. All these views although they haven't been around very long, seem to suggest that the existence of a divine creator is tunnel vision and old fashioned. These modern views have challenged theology to its limit but I feel that no matter what new theories and views are thought of, there will always be room for beliefs in the existence of God because some people believe that God isn't meant to be explained or proved, for if it was what would we have to look forward to. The existence of heaven and hell would be proved and no one would have the mysterious quality in their lives anymore. Some things just aren't meant to be explained or proved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. What are the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain", and is ...

    I can tell this because I know from experience that my parents were disappointed in me. "For a belief to become justified, it has to be compared with a fixed theory or belief that is dependable. As humans, our strongest belief is our emotions and memories.

  2. 'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

    (Is there a God? p.49) However, Stuart Brown (p.77) advises against this because it is controversial as to which proposal is less complex, so could theoretically be adopted by either side of the argument.

  1. Corporate religious experiences such as the Toronto blessing tell us nothing about god. Discuss

    Revelation does not have much to do with believers own experiences; it is not personal, more of a generalised belief. Many different religions worldwide would base much of their God on a holy book, where it would have sense of the history and foundations of the religion.

  2. corporate religious experience such as the toronto blessing tell us nothing about god

    Often people claimed to have had feeling of electricity or a powerful energy passing though their body and stagger about as if drunk or simply collapse to the floor - "slain in the spirit". Most commonly associated with the Toronto blessing are large numbers of people wailing, crying, yelping, barking,

  1. Living In a Plural Society.

    Chief among them are Shiva, a fierce figure representing both the creative and destructive sides of divinity as well as the ideal of yogic meditation, and Vishhnu, who incarnates himself many times through history in order to bring the message of salvation to man.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Followers of classical theism, however acknowledge the all-powerful creator of the universe. This means that because God created the world from 'ex-nihilo' he is therefore responsible for everything in it. If he is all-powerful then he has the ability to end the suffering and evil in our world and because

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    To see this, note that the right side of the above (simplified) equation represents the density of matter multiplied by 4*pi. If there is matter present in the universe, then the matter density of the universe is positive . This implies that the right side of the equation, 4*pi*(density of matter), will be positive.

  2. "The Sinner is often the Saint." In what way does Greene explore this paradox ...

    Once the reader is introduced to his wife Louise, it becomes obvious that she is a 'snob'. Even though it is the colonial context of the book that suggests the creation of this snobbery, Scobie has chosen to rid

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work