• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

Extracts from this document...


Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics. The issue in question is one with regards to morality, the problem of answering such questions as how does one live the good life? What is the good? How does one determine which actions are right and which actions are wrong? It is interesting from the get go that humans seek to answer these questions, one could assume that our own intuition could answer these questions for us, or turn to the respective religions that are overflowing with rules of morality and life laws. Nevertheless, throughout history theorists and philosophers alike have attempted to answer these questions through analysis and occasionally under the influence of their particular religions as well. Today we study a range of philosophies from Plato to Peter Singer, and in most cases we find that the moment a theory seems to be adaptable and just to our own lives, a flaw surfaces and is usually followed by many more which make us question our faith in such a theory initially. Kantian ethics and utilitarianism do just that. The biggest debate in ethics today seems to be between Kant's categorical imperative and the utilitarian's greatest happiness principle. To realistically examine these theories we must recognize that there are significant problems with both ideas, which lead us back to the questions we started with. It is apparent however, that alternatives to these two conflicting schools of thought have been offered. One example is that of WD Ross who proposes some inclinations as to how both theories may be used and how certain aspects of them must be discarded at the outset. ...read more.


a moral theory in this manner because humans are an ever unpredictable, evolving species feeling and experiencing different things in different ways all the time. Kant's moral theory or deontology has similar problems regardless of how much it differs from utilitarianism. In the case of deontology the problem lies with the matter of intentions. Kantian ethics maintain that the intentions one has are all that matter when placed with arduous moral choices. At the base of Kantian ethics is his categorical imperative, which is a set of rules that outline "that only the good will, a will to act out of a sense of duty, has unqualified moral worth."3 The categorical imperative simply, is this: "Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."4 And that we should never treat anyone as a means to an end. According to Kantian ethics there are universal moral laws, which we must follow unconditionally. There are many problems with this, and first and foremost I feel that Kant is trying to place a one-dimensional theory of ethics on a three-dimensional world full of unexpected incidents. Humans have proven time and time again to be extremely unpredictable and the nature of the earth doesn't help either. By the nature of the earth I mean the unexpected, unexplained happenings that occur and do not cease to surprise us. Kant's theory is too authoritative for us to adopt and positively function with. ...read more.


The problem of morality is clearly one that requires much thought, questioning and general brainwork. There are so many writings on the topic, it's possible to lose one's self in all of it. Of all the things I have made it clear how utilitarianism fails as an ethical theory, it is too demanding of us, it is unjust, it allows for us to enter the virtual reality world of the experience machine and lastly that the question of personal preference cannot be addressed when approaching ethics in this manner. It has also been made clear why Kant's deontology isn't workable, hard laws and rules about how to conduct one's life don't solve problems, the world is too unpredictable, which also brings us to the next point that Kant's theory doesn't do well when presented with hard choices, the trolley for example. Utilitarianism's reliance on consequence and Kant's on intention is where both theories find their major downfall, because as they display for each other both must be taken into consideration. Ross's intuitionism brings a little clearing to the murky waters of morality and Frankena as well, raises many valuable points in "A Reconciliation of Ethical Theories" which leads us to believe then that morality is plainly a contextual matter and also a personal one. We need to approach each situation with caution and empathy and use our best-felt judgment when faced with tough choices, while keeping in mind that there are things that are wrong and right which are usually innate to each and every one of us. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    The state promotes the common good and therefore deserves obedience. This again leads back in to the argument put forward by Aristotle, that being unjust is the equivalent of being unlawful. In this way it is clear that both Aristotle and Plato agree on a framework for which justice should be gained in.

  2. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    For example, one might make the decision to have a baby - which will obviously cause pleasure for the parents - however the woman may have a miscarriage which will cause large amounts of pain. Therefore, a utilitarian can never be sure that the action really is the right one to choose.

  1. Religion and Medical Ethics

    this,' she said, 'but the scriptures don't allow legal adoption as it is practiced in the West. The child keeps its given name and does not inherit anything from the family'. (a)(iii) Explain why religious people may have problems with transplant surgery. Some Christian's do not agree with transplant surgery.

  2. Virtue Ethics

    and that the mistake has been to associate good with actions rather than people. She argued that responsibility to follow rules made absolutely no sense without faith in God. She thought that a person's character is the key to eudaimonia, and believed we should return to Aristotle.

  1. RE crousework topic 9

    (Quran 2:271) Donating without others knowing is in some situations better for the charitable person, because it may shield their affection to give, and in some cases it may also benefit the receiver of the charity because it let's them hold onto their dignity and honour.

  2. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    be regarded as "the morally preferable thing to do" in special circumstances. And that teleological Ethical theories, such as utilitarianism or situation ethics, intrinsically do not have any moral absolutes so there is never any time when abortion is definitely right or wrong.

  1. "Medical research in the U.K. is being suffocated by excessive governance and ethical review".

    This means the review process would be more difficult as sometimes ethical and scientific reviews are hard to separate for reasons mentioned earlier in this article, hence decisions made by committees could become more controversial than ever before. Community Considerations In the past much conflict resulted in the presence of

  2. Outline the principles of situation ethics

    This approach would base all moral decisions on one universal principle, agape (????? : unconditional love in Greek) or to do whatever is the most loving thing. This is what Jesus used to illustrate the greatest commandment ie love. This agape love will motivate and decide all moral decisions that Christians make.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work