• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Religion and politics

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Both liberals and conservatives have become quite adept at mixing religion and politics in our current society. One also continues to observe an ongoing practice of civil religion demonstrated by presidents and office-seekers on both the left and right. Generally, the leftist merger of religion and politics has received greater social acceptability because it has been cloaked in such rights' causes as civil rights, women's rights, or economic rights (the social distribution of wealth). The advocating of these rights issues have provided an appearance of transcending religion, keeping the left relatively free from criticism of any church and state overlap. Christian Conservatives, however, have found it more difficult to reasonably combine faith and politics because they have more overtly recognized that their political positions are grounded on faith assumptions. This has resulted in numerous attacks by both non-Christians and Christians alike against the conservative attempt to merge religion and politics. Three arguments have been used most frequently against the conservative mixture of religion and politics. In what follows each of these arguments is stated and then refuted. The first argument is that politics is too worldly. The essence of the argument is that politics is part of this world's system, and Christ clearly taught His followers to "love not the world," and to flee from worldly activities. ...read more.

Middle

It does not mean to keep these areas fro m redemption. It does not mean to remove oneself from all activities in the world. Politics can, thus, be godly or worldly, depending upon the mindset and the character one brings to it. The second argument used against Christian political involvement is that it is morally wrong to infringe or force one's personal views on society at large. This is the argument that Christians hear, through many subtle means, from non-Christians. In our postmodern culture, tolerance has emerged as the most treasured virtue. Tolerance supposedly demonstrates the highest expression of compassion, caring, unity, and, ultimately, love for one's fellow humans. In a pluralistic society with a wide diversity of viewpoints, a person must not promote beliefs that are by nature exclusive (like Christianity) because this would demonstrate intolerance, disrespect, or even hate for those in disagreement. Love and unity must be preserved at all costs. Thus, Christians cannot bring values derived from their faith into the public domain as part of public policy for that would be harmful and offensive to others, and, ultimately, immoral to do so. This argument could formally read as follows: Premise 1: Tolerance is the supreme contemporary virtue. If you do not practice tolerance then you do not love; to be intolerant is to hate. ...read more.

Conclusion

This original understanding of the Constitution has evolved into the contemporary reinterpretation where it now means we must have a secular state where God is kept entirely out of the political and social arena. The original intention was that the church and state would be two distinct and separate institutions but both under God. Nowhere does the First Amendment prohibit people with religious convictions from applying faith precepts to the legislative activities of the state. There is no violation of the First Amendment when Christian apply biblical principles to public policy issues. Clearly, these three popular arguments used against conservative Christians in order to keep them from political activity are not valid. Furthermore, in the Bible there is much political activity by God's servants. The judges and kings ruled under God. The prophets and Moses were quite political. Daniel served in the civil governments of Babylon and Persia. Joseph governed in Egypt. The Apostles spoke of following God's rules rather than men's. In conclusion, to be obedient to Christ requires political activity. Jesus is quite clear about the need to overcome social injustices. If Christ tells us to confront the forces of evil, but society tells us not to, and even makes a law against bringing religion into politics, then who should we follow, the state or Christ? In the broadest sense, we are called to political activity because we are responsible to apply Christian principles and standards to all areas of our society, and politics is one of these areas. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. We live in a world of armed conflict - Explain what differing Christian beliefs ...

    he started the long battle against racism in the USA and the world. His eloquent speeches are still referred to and he signified how violence is not the only solution. Jesus also stated this particularly in his arrest where he told Peter 'all who take the sword die by the sword' which signifies that violence attracts more violence.

  2. Religion, Poverty and Wealth - Describe the teachings of the religion that you ...

    A man who helps the less fortunate by not taking them in looking after them but to help them make their own money. Sir John Templeton was a man who grew up on a farm in Tennessee in USA. He completed a successful education at Yale and Oxford Universities.

  1. Sample Politics Questions

    (1993) 8) 'Public campaigns are hardly ever effective.' Is it true? (1993) 9) Does sports always contribute to international harmony and understanding? (1993) 10) 'The truth should be told, whatever the cost.' Should it? (1993) 11) 'To live is to change.'

  2. ‘Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security’ (UN Dec. Human Rites) - ...

    But sometimes they believe that it is necessary to go to war, to defend against the greater evil. Jesus also said 'You have heard that it said "eye for eye, tooth for tooth" but I tell you, do not repay evil with evil...

  1. Explain why the first Christians were persecuted

    Christianity contradicted all their believes as Christianity says that there is only one God, while they believed in many gods. They thought they were right and so the resolved to roughage to prevent Christianity from growing rather that bringing those Christians to their believes.

  2. Free essay

    Christian Perspectives

    God created humans in his own image. (Genesis 1:26-28). God had given responsibility to human beings to look after the world he had made, and therefore any problems which occur on Earth shall be blamed upon human beings, not God. This idea of looking after the world God has given is called stewardship.

  1. Free essay

    The Role of the Accident Compensation Corporation in the Prevention of Family Violence in ...

    From Fear (Donovan, Francas, Paterson & Zapelli 2000), Aktiv gegen M´┐Żnnergewalt / Active Against Male Violence (Women Against Violence Europe), Zero Tolerance Campaign (Women Against Violence Europe)

  2. Why has American society developed so violently?

    Often people did not like the cultural heritage these groups brought and the fear of the alien brought violence. These events however also have to be viewed in context as the times themselves were generally very violent. There were attacks on abolitionist leaders, and Mormons as well as urban riots in places like New Yorkwhere gangs embarked on murderous battles.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work