• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Religion and politics

Extracts from this document...


Both liberals and conservatives have become quite adept at mixing religion and politics in our current society. One also continues to observe an ongoing practice of civil religion demonstrated by presidents and office-seekers on both the left and right. Generally, the leftist merger of religion and politics has received greater social acceptability because it has been cloaked in such rights' causes as civil rights, women's rights, or economic rights (the social distribution of wealth). The advocating of these rights issues have provided an appearance of transcending religion, keeping the left relatively free from criticism of any church and state overlap. Christian Conservatives, however, have found it more difficult to reasonably combine faith and politics because they have more overtly recognized that their political positions are grounded on faith assumptions. This has resulted in numerous attacks by both non-Christians and Christians alike against the conservative attempt to merge religion and politics. Three arguments have been used most frequently against the conservative mixture of religion and politics. In what follows each of these arguments is stated and then refuted. The first argument is that politics is too worldly. The essence of the argument is that politics is part of this world's system, and Christ clearly taught His followers to "love not the world," and to flee from worldly activities. ...read more.


It does not mean to keep these areas fro m redemption. It does not mean to remove oneself from all activities in the world. Politics can, thus, be godly or worldly, depending upon the mindset and the character one brings to it. The second argument used against Christian political involvement is that it is morally wrong to infringe or force one's personal views on society at large. This is the argument that Christians hear, through many subtle means, from non-Christians. In our postmodern culture, tolerance has emerged as the most treasured virtue. Tolerance supposedly demonstrates the highest expression of compassion, caring, unity, and, ultimately, love for one's fellow humans. In a pluralistic society with a wide diversity of viewpoints, a person must not promote beliefs that are by nature exclusive (like Christianity) because this would demonstrate intolerance, disrespect, or even hate for those in disagreement. Love and unity must be preserved at all costs. Thus, Christians cannot bring values derived from their faith into the public domain as part of public policy for that would be harmful and offensive to others, and, ultimately, immoral to do so. This argument could formally read as follows: Premise 1: Tolerance is the supreme contemporary virtue. If you do not practice tolerance then you do not love; to be intolerant is to hate. ...read more.


This original understanding of the Constitution has evolved into the contemporary reinterpretation where it now means we must have a secular state where God is kept entirely out of the political and social arena. The original intention was that the church and state would be two distinct and separate institutions but both under God. Nowhere does the First Amendment prohibit people with religious convictions from applying faith precepts to the legislative activities of the state. There is no violation of the First Amendment when Christian apply biblical principles to public policy issues. Clearly, these three popular arguments used against conservative Christians in order to keep them from political activity are not valid. Furthermore, in the Bible there is much political activity by God's servants. The judges and kings ruled under God. The prophets and Moses were quite political. Daniel served in the civil governments of Babylon and Persia. Joseph governed in Egypt. The Apostles spoke of following God's rules rather than men's. In conclusion, to be obedient to Christ requires political activity. Jesus is quite clear about the need to overcome social injustices. If Christ tells us to confront the forces of evil, but society tells us not to, and even makes a law against bringing religion into politics, then who should we follow, the state or Christ? In the broadest sense, we are called to political activity because we are responsible to apply Christian principles and standards to all areas of our society, and politics is one of these areas. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Explain why the first Christians were persecuted

    When people talk about life as a quiet life, they usually refer to it as being one where a person does not take part in social activities, possibly like joining in parties, or in other words, it could be a person who prefers to stay away from society, either to

  2. Free essay

    Christian Perspectives

    It is known as The Fall of Man. God created human beings to look after the world and rule above other creatures; the fish, the birds, livestock and all of the creatures on the ground. God created humans in his own image.

  1. Why has American society developed so violently?

    It was small wonder that a lot of violence came from the less well off, rural folk protesting at the inequality. But the simple underlying fact is - they feared the changes that were taking place. The second Red scare, from 1946-68, although born in completely different circumstances, produced violence of a similar nature for similar reasons.


    If the situation only suggests illegal sex, he's entitled to a reduced sentence. In such cases, jail terms range from a few months to a few years. Sirhan served six months. Not only is this cruel and vicious, it seems to be almost unrealistic.

  1. What does Christianity teach about human responsibility for the world?

    welfare: the well being of their soul, their body, and their community. Christians look to Jesus for an example for their lives. Jesus humbled himself and became weak and vulnerable to serve people. He healed the sick, feed the hungry and was a friend to the dropouts.

  2. Considering creatures by the name of Hard Cases, we are to assume that their ...

    Do they have to be justified in the deontological sense? They seem to possess all their discretionary powers within the evidentiary world that they experience; we know better, they are stuck in a reality where they are beyond an intellectual control to change their basic evidentiary knowledge.

  1. We live in a world of armed conflict - Explain what differing Christian beliefs ...

    Nor will they train for war anymore'. This shows that the wish of God is to have a world of peace and Micah interpreted his dream this way. When Jesus was betrayed by Judas, Peter attacked the slave of the High Priest cutting off his ear. Jesus rebuked 'All who take the sword die by the sword'.

  2. Religion, Poverty and Wealth - Describe the teachings of the religion that you ...

    This justifies that you don't have to worship anyone; you don't have to pray at all. Just do one thing, let there be peace and human rights in this world for us to live in a safe world. Task B: There is no point in believing in god if you are not prepared to do something about.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work