• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on this claim

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Bibliography Title Author Publisher Date The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe C.S.Lewis A Beginners Guide to Ideas Raeper & Smith Lion Publishers 1991 Philosophy of Religion Anne Jordan, Neil Lockyer & Edwin Tate A level Religious Studies Gordon Read & Sarah Tyler Philip Alan 1999 The Puzzle of God Peter Vardy Harper Collins 1990 Varieties of Religious Experience James 1902 www.buddhistfaith.tripod.com/integrated/id10.html www.philosophyofreligion.info/principal of credulity www.wikipedia.org/wiki/religious_experienc The Bible "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on this claim In 'The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe' by C.S.Lewis, when Peter and Susan go to the professor to express their concern for Lucy, the professor replies with "There are only three possibilities. Either your sister is telling lies, or she is mad, or she is telling the truth." This statement illustrates Swinburnes 'Principal of Credulity' which states that 'if it seems to a subject that x is present, then probably x is present'. Hence if Lucy isn't mad, and she does not tell lies, then you would have to conclude that she is telling the truth. This is what Swinburne is saying when it comes to God and religious experience. Generally, says Swinburne, it is reasonable to believe that the world is probably as we experience it to be. Unless we have some specific reason to question a religious experience, then we ought to except that it is at least prima facie evidence for the existence of God. During the course of this study I intend to examine and critically evaluate this approach to religious experience and several others in order to address the question 'Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer'. I will hope to find whether or not religious experience is something that people actually undergo or whether it is in fact all in the mind. I feel that religious experience cannot just be dismissed, but is it a reason for the belief in God and can it be seen as valid? ...read more.

Middle

things suddenly became different... there was a tremendous awe, and the sense of the presence of God... people began to fall under the power of God... there was a lot of crying and a lot of heart-searching... God was obviously present.' In a crowd of like minded individuals, it is arguably easy to be swept along the tide of emotion and to feel compelled to be sharing the same experience as fellow worshipers. I agree with this statement, I feel that this might have occurred during the Toronto blessing and that the people did not really have a religious experience but rather was swept up in the crowd. This could have happened by the techniques of lighting, music and repetition of words having a physical and psychological effect on the people, this is the sort of thing that can be misinterpreted as a religious experience of the divine. The argument from religious experience is the argument from the experiences of God to the existence of God. In its strong form, this argument asserts that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and so that the phenomenon of religious experience demonstrates the existence of God, people experience God, therefore their must be a God; case closed. In its weaker form, the argument asserts only that a religious experience constitutes evidence for Gods existence. As I have articulated earlier this form of the argument has been defended by Richard Swinburne with an appeal to the principal of credulity. As well as Richard Swinburne's principal of credulity he also came up with his principal of testimony which claims that it is reasonable to accept that other people usually tell the truth. So, in the absence of special considerations, it is reasonable to believe the reports of those who claim to have religious experiences. To simplify we should believe a person unless we have good reason not to (i.e. ...read more.

Conclusion

Such an experience can be spontaneous or it may be brought about as a result of intensive training and self discipline. An example of this is the practises of the Sufi orders of Islam, or Buddhist mystical experience that has been explained earlier. To conclude I think that religious experience is all in the mind. This is because if I look back at Swinburne's principal of credulity it seems to me that he only takes a belief of God point of view into consideration and he rejects that some sort of atheist experience is evidence of no God i.e. it is very one sided. I think in some cases the person thinks that the experience is God when really it isn't; they only want it to be God because God is made out to be all powerful and all loving, and the person feels that their life would become better if they were a part of that. An example of this could be the conversion of Nicky Cruz (1938), a gangster turned Christian He said he had some sort of religious experience and because of it turned to God. Now this could be that he did actually have an experience of God, but what I believe is that he obviously had psychological problems from his childhood because he wasn't in a stable relationship with his parents and therefore when this priest went out of his way to help him without wanting anything in return, Nicky saw him as a father figure and realized he wanted to belong somewhere, this place being with God. Sigmund Freud (1858-1939) believed that religion is 'a universal obsessional neurosis' which is demonstrating on what I think on Nicky Cruz. Freud thought that religious experiences are the manifestation of psychological needs. And that religion is nothing more then an illusion created by people to enable them to cope with the haunting fear of death and alienation. From examining this question I have come to the conclusion that yes, religious experience is all in the mind. ?? ?? ?? ?? Emma Wright 12JOW Religious Education ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "A religious experince is a sponatnious or induced,mental event over which the recepient has ...

    Furthermore an atheist would be highly unlikely to be in a situation where they would come across reading from the bible and as they have a negative response to religions they would not necessarily take it seriously. Whereas for theists, mystical experiences are likely to be the most significant in

  2. Logical Positivism and the Meaninglessness of Religious Language.

    According to Ayer, the positivist view rules out not only theism but also atheism and agnosticism; if 'God exists' is meaningless, it can be neither affirmed nor denied nor even proposed as a possibility whose truth is not ascertainable. Yet, as C.S.

  1. 'An analysis of arguments for the existence of God will result in valid philosophical ...

    This he called the Principle of Testimony. Swinburne and Davies have claimed that the argument holds sway because of simple cumulative logic. If the arguments for and against the existence of God are considered, they are fairly evenly balanced. Some of the arguments strengthen the likelihood that God exists whilst

  2. What does St. Thomas Aquinas consider to be the nature and methodology of the ...

    As Catholics we have to come from or have a start point with God. To pull away the layers we must base our enquiries on sound principles. These principles are handed down to us in his teaching. To nourish our faith he has given us signs that as humans we

  1. corporate religious experience such as the toronto blessing tell us nothing about god

    Around 4 million Christians have 'experienced the blessing' at Toronto (in a building that can now accommodate 3,500) and millions more have been affected by the migration of the movement to various places.

  2. Compare and contrast two of the following and evaluate their significance for understanding religious ...

    That is that we cannot use human language literally or univocally when we speak about God. This is because our terms can only come from our human (finite) experience and so cannot be adequate in relation to God. So when used in religious language their meaning is always partially "negated by that to which they point."

  1. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    This sort of evidence was brought forward in support of the first premise of the argument that the world showed evidence of design qua purpose. A pig is designed with many teats because it brings many offspring into the world, it is so designed for the purpose of feeding its young.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Yet it has attracted new criticisms. Irenaeus view that everyone goes to heaven has attracted new criticism because it seems unjust, thus calling God justice into question. Christians and religious believers have called this theory into question because it contradicts religious texts, including the bible and the Qur'an, which promise punishment for the unrighteous.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work