• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Religious Philosophy:The Paradox of the God of Classical Theism

Extracts from this document...


Religious Philosophy: The Paradox of the God of Classical Theism If you were to ask people at random 'Where is God?' some would point to the sky, where others would point to their chest, or you may get the reply 'God is everywhere' for Christians - all three of these responses hold truth. The attributes of God include being omnipresent, tangible and infinite. Many people argue that these qualities contradict each other, making God completely incoherent. One of the qualities of God is omnipotence, literally meaning 'all power'. Therefore God has the power to do absolutely anything. The concept of omnipotence is inconsistent and could also raise questions such as 'Can God invent problems that he himself cannot solve?' Any answer to this question would suggest that God is not omnipotent. ...read more.


Infinity is somewhat impossible for humans to comprehend, as we can't imagine there being 'nothingness' which would have to also mean no time or no space. God is a 'Sustainer' meaning that God is the sustaining force keeping the universe together, and without this sustaining force the universe would not be here. However; this is contradicted by another attribute of God - 'Perfectly free'. This contradiction raises the question 'How is God bound to sustain the universe and also be perfectly free?' Being 'perfectly free' can also question many of the other attributes of the God of classical theism, for example God has to be omnipotent and omni benevolent, but how can he be if he is perfectly free to do what he wants whenever he wants? ...read more.


There are many other paradoxes associated with The God of Classical Theism that aren't directly related to the thirteen attributes that God holds. One infamous example is 'Is God is known for being good, why is it that evil exists in the world?' Many questions like this can jeopardise people's faith in God, even more so knowing that there is no way of justifying the existence of God. In my opinion, these paradoxes lead more towards proving that the God of Classical Theism does not exist, however, it is of course possible for someone to have faith in God, without believing that each one of these attributes are true. I personally feel that the most important attribute is 'personal' as God should be personal to every single person, and each different person should have their own perception of God. Recourses used: http://www.google.com http:// www.wordiq.com ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "A religious experince is a sponatnious or induced,mental event over which the recepient has ...

    This is because experiencing a sunset is something possibly thousands or millions of people would be experiencing at once and therefore it is not a personal experience with God, which weakens the argument, suggesting they may simply be an experience.

  2. Concept of God - Analysis of God as a creator and sustainer.

    Thus, every aspect of who we are depends on something as we are entirely contingent. So to say we are not dependant on anything for our continued existence is illogical, if we were not dependant on something for existence we would become self-sustaining and never pass out of existence which is clearly not the case.

  1. Why does God allow Evil if he is omnipotent, omniscient and perfectly benevolent?

    and no point of existing so you could say that "Free Will" is worth all the suffering but then is god not evil to make a decision he knew would make our lives extraordinary but filled with suffering? Could he not do so we have a "Free Will" but a will of making and creating peace, prosperity and love?

  2. The God Question

    punished for our wrongdoings but if this is true then what of young children who die at birth? What possible sins could they have committed in their short-lived existence? The other issue with the existence of God is that if he is all powerful can he perform illogical actions?

  1. Asses Sartre's COntribution Toward the philosophy of freedom

    the world to determine who we will be through the choices we make for ourselves in our lives. Sartre does not deny that humans have an essence only that we do not have it when we are born. Instead Sartre believes our essence exists at the end of our lives and is made from the decisions we have made.

  2. Agnosticism, Atheism, and Theism

    Proof requires indisputable evidence to support the claim. The answer to our original question-is there a God-cannot be proven in a factual sense. It cannot be experimented on and published in a scientific media; the nature of this question is not of the physical world.

  1. "The Sinner is often the Saint." In what way does Greene explore this paradox ...

    It is this love, which Yusef has for Scobie that also represents a paradox to mirror the one seen in the title, that one so evil, a 'sinner', can acknowledge the existence of a 'saint'. Another method, which Greene has used to highlight the 'saint' in Scobie, is by contrasting

  2. The omnipotence of God

    If it can, then it cannot be omnipotent since it is possible for something to be more powerful than itself. However if it cannot, then it is not an omnipotent being. The second definition offered is that an omnipotent being would be able to do anything logically possible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work