• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Review of Adorno and Horkheimer's The dialectic of enlightenment

Extracts from this document...


Book Review: Adorno and Horkheimer's 'Dialectic of Enlightenment' Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer from the 'Frankfurt School' of thought, with their 'collective of understanding reality', were both educated German Jews. Who took an examining look at the 'Enlightenment'. Written in 1947 at the In their book, they synthesis both Freud and Marx, accepting both theories as being feasable. They accept the Marxist approach whereby economics is the sole aspect of society, the class struggle, commodity and the exchange of goods. However they recognise that this is merely one side and that there is the spiritual being which in itself needs catering for. The needs and desires of the individuals that are repressed by the society and constraints in which we live in. The Psychic development of the individual from birth, as it grows and learns how to conform to society. Freud and Marx both agreed however that conflict was the 'motor' of history, although differing on the conflict levels. For Freud it is the 'individual's conflict with society' and for Marx it is as we know the neverending 'class conflict'. The importance of these two philosophical thinkers is that they have pathed the way for Adorno and Horkheimer to understand the both the 'individual' and 'society', by incorporating the two. ...read more.


Which means that enlightnement still recogniszes itself even in myths.' ['Dialectic of Enlightenment', M. Horkheimer & T. Adorno. Trans. By John Cumming 1972] This form of Enlightenment reverts back to mythology, the belief is a form of mythology itself, by saying Enlightenment has been here all along and by escaping mythology through Enlightenment we only revert back to mythology as it in itself is mythology. 'Myth is already enlightnement; and enlightenment reverts to mythology'. ['Dialectic of Enlightenment', M. Horkheimer & T. Adorno. Trans. By John Cumming 1972 p. xvi] Mythology and Enlightenment to Adorno and Horkheimer have their roots in the same basic needs. Survival, self preservation and fear. Fear being the most important aspect as it leaves room for control, fear of the unknown is something people in power can use to control society and have been doing so since the beginning of power struggles in the world. This fear also stops us from 'going too far' restrictions of law, fear of getting caught etc. All form the fear installed in society from a young age to keep order. 'Man imagines himself free from fear when there is no longer anything unknown,. That determines the course of demythologization , of enlightenment, which compounds the animate with the inanimate just as myth compounds the inanimate with the animate. Enlightenment is mythic fear turned radical.' ['Dialectic of Enlightenment', M. ...read more.


Freud believed that there were high levels of conformity which existed, and the more conformity that existed lead to more exclusion, and eventually those that did not conform were seen as a 'threat'. Adorno and Horkheimer developed a wider, and more pessimistic concept of enlightenment. In their analysis enlightenment had its dark side: while trying to abolish superstition and myths by 'foundationalist' philosophy, it ignored its own 'mythical' basis. Its strivings towards totality and certainty led to an increasing instrumentalization of reason. In their view the enlightenment itself should be enlightened and not posed as a 'myth-free' view of the world. Enlightnement is a 'process of engagement', this engagement with a 'temporary' reality, a reality that is forever changing and therefore the need for philosopher's should be constantly changing. Core theories of Hegel and Marx are relevant and do find their places in history however there is a need to adapt these theories for the relevant times in history. This is the complexity of contemporary reality, we may understand Hegel, then we may lose this comprehension due to changes in time. .....'That arid wisdom that holds there is nothing new under the sun, because all the pieces in the meaningless game have been played, and all the great thoughts have already been thought, and because all possible discoveries can be construed in advance' ['Dialectic of Enlightenment', M. Horkheimer & T. Adorno. Trans. By John Cumming 1972 p.12] Nothing new, all seen before ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Buddhism section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Buddhism essays

  1. What are the main differences between Sikhism and Buddhism?

    The Buddha derived his ideas from both the Brahmanical as well as from the Sramanic traditions, finally fusing them together into an original synthesis through the force of his spiritual experience. A4: Explain briefly the subject matter of the scripture/s of Buddhism.

  2. The Buddhas life of poverty was more important for his enlightenment, than his life ...

    This meant he found out the truth about how things are - his questions were answered. He taught people to follow the four noble truths and they will find happiness. They are: 1. Annica - belief that nothing is impermanence.

  1. A Review And Analysis Of 'The Matrix' By The Wachowski Brothers, And Its Exploration ...

    The location of the human settlement, Zion, is unknown to the robots, who insert themselves into the Matrix as a set of programs, known to the renegades as 'the Agents'. These Agents kidnap Morpheus and attempt to break his spirit to make him tell them the codes into Zion.

  2. Analysis the Sutra on the Eight Realizations of the Great Beings.

    The Second Realization Human beings-1.More desires because of greed-cause> 2.Suffering because of samsara-effect> Bodhisattvas-1.little desire and ambition because of precepts> 2.to relax their bodies and minds because of freeing from entanglement> From the Second Realization to the Seventh Realization, they are talking about the view of life for Buddhism.

  1. Buddist ethics - The war on Iraq.

    You must be patient Mr Blair, and not rush into things, and you must thus approach the situation, by keeping in mind that you must not be selfish for yourself, but must also think of countless others, that will suffer terribly, and have great pain put on them.

  2. Describe in detail what is meant by the ‘Middle Way’.

    (2-6am) He understood all the things that keep creatures bound to the wheel of life, which is negative feelings and cravings that make people grasp at life, even though this brings more suffering. He also knew that he had overcome these cravings.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work