• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"'Right' and 'wrong' are just expressions of preference; they do not refer to any absolute set of values." Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"'Right' and 'wrong' are just expressions of preference; they do not refer to any absolute set of values." Discuss. (17 marks) The question of the existence of absolute 'rights' and 'wrongs' is a much-debated topic in society. Many argue there is no such thing and that all moral judgements are made by order of preference rather than following a set of moral rules or guidelines. It is natural for us as humans who were built to think for ourselves, to want to portray our viewpoint to others on topics of great discussion. Therefore we can expect personal opinions or preferences to take an important role in decision-making. However, many argue this way of thinking has no moral value at all. It is merely stating what you feel rather than what is morally 'right'. Expressions of preference are ideas that people are inclined to believe to be correct. They are based on our emotions and feelings, and what we would like to see happen as a consequence to our preference. This key idea is mainly reflected in Emotivism, which is in opposition to absolutism. ...read more.

Middle

W D Ross argued that "I know what my duty is, but sometimes it conflicts with another and therefore a choice must be made." He is saying that everything still has a self-evident 'goodness' but we are simply put in the position where we have to choose the greater of two evils. We have to decide which option brings more 'good' to the world and opt for that. This means ethical dilemmas are merely a result of 'conflicting duties'. Even so, there are still many situations where we do not know what is right and many cultures where there is no one ethical way of life, we do not have clear instincts on some moral dilemmas. It also may be perceived as insufficient to simply say we cannot define the moral term 'good' because it leaves us with so many unanswered questions. It seems to be taking the easy way out and does not supply us with a satisfactory solution. It is totally avoiding answering some of the most difficult questions in Meta ethics such as "what does it mean to be 'bad'." ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore we must include this in the way we think to receive a balanced and fair point of view on everything. Reducing it to mere emotions is not considered an acceptable way of looking at things. To make a fair and all rounded balanced and acceptable decision, we must include both emotion and reason together, which is why Prescriptivism plays such an important role in Meta ethics. Prescriptivism helps to overcome the problem of Reductivism in Emotivism. This is because rational thinking is brought into consideration, prescribing a course of action to be taken rather than solely relying upon our feelings. In conclusion, I think that whether we believe 'right' or 'wrong' to be mere personal preference or to have some deeper meaning, which follows absolute values all, depends on personal opinion. Many would say there is no such thing as an absolute set of values because everything depends on different circumstances as to whether it is right or wrong. Others would say there are some sets of values or morals that are always right, such as striving for peace or happiness. It all depends on which side you base the majority of your decision making; your emotions and feelings or your logic and reasoning. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. TOK Essay: Reason and Emotion

    Throughout Marco Matarazzi of the Italian team, who is a well known for causing other players to loose their temper, was on a mission to make Zidane loose his temper, until five minutes before the end of regulation time he succeeded.

  2. "Describe and evaluate Emotivism, showing knowledge of its key thinkers and critics?"

    However the philosopher Stevenson would disagree. Stevenson argued that a moral judgement contains either an expression of an attitude based on a belief or a persuasive element which seeks to influence others. He maintains that a moral disagreement tells us more about the peoples beliefs, rather than a "boo / hurrah" shouting match.

  1. RE crousework topic 9

    * The people who are in debt and are having difficulty in repaying it back. * The money is used to buy slaves and then give them a free life. * Zakat can also be given in the cause of Allah.

  2. Different religious and philosophical views on controversial topics.

    Comic relief Comic relief is when most charity is given in the UK. This should be an inherently good thing; however, should we need events like this to spur out charitable nature. Surely charity should be a natural human instinct?

  1. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    The Catholic Church says it is totally wrong, always, as shown in The Catechisms Of The Catholic Church, in which it says; Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having

  2. A classmate has cheated. You have seen him/her. Discuss the several elements from a ...

    In addition, having the ability to respect is also a virtue in life. Cheating implies the low confidence of the student which in another way shows the disrespect to the teachers, exams, school as well as the rules. There are also many other virtues which can be developed by a student.

  1. 'The availability of contraception makes society 'less moral' than it used to be.' Do ...

    The Roman Catholic view towards contraception would also be a very negative one as they are completely against any type of artificial contraception.

  2. War should never occur. Do you agree? Critically discuss this statement. Include an Christian ...

    Allowing people to believe in things that may be truly wrong and that something they believe in which is completely unjust. I believe that it is only so far for one to peruse their belief before crossing that line. In which their self-interest takes a step too far and so allowing mass murder to happen, which cannot be risked.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work