• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"'Right' and 'wrong' are just expressions of preference; they do not refer to any absolute set of values." Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


"'Right' and 'wrong' are just expressions of preference; they do not refer to any absolute set of values." Discuss. (17 marks) The question of the existence of absolute 'rights' and 'wrongs' is a much-debated topic in society. Many argue there is no such thing and that all moral judgements are made by order of preference rather than following a set of moral rules or guidelines. It is natural for us as humans who were built to think for ourselves, to want to portray our viewpoint to others on topics of great discussion. Therefore we can expect personal opinions or preferences to take an important role in decision-making. However, many argue this way of thinking has no moral value at all. It is merely stating what you feel rather than what is morally 'right'. Expressions of preference are ideas that people are inclined to believe to be correct. They are based on our emotions and feelings, and what we would like to see happen as a consequence to our preference. This key idea is mainly reflected in Emotivism, which is in opposition to absolutism. ...read more.


W D Ross argued that "I know what my duty is, but sometimes it conflicts with another and therefore a choice must be made." He is saying that everything still has a self-evident 'goodness' but we are simply put in the position where we have to choose the greater of two evils. We have to decide which option brings more 'good' to the world and opt for that. This means ethical dilemmas are merely a result of 'conflicting duties'. Even so, there are still many situations where we do not know what is right and many cultures where there is no one ethical way of life, we do not have clear instincts on some moral dilemmas. It also may be perceived as insufficient to simply say we cannot define the moral term 'good' because it leaves us with so many unanswered questions. It seems to be taking the easy way out and does not supply us with a satisfactory solution. It is totally avoiding answering some of the most difficult questions in Meta ethics such as "what does it mean to be 'bad'." ...read more.


Therefore we must include this in the way we think to receive a balanced and fair point of view on everything. Reducing it to mere emotions is not considered an acceptable way of looking at things. To make a fair and all rounded balanced and acceptable decision, we must include both emotion and reason together, which is why Prescriptivism plays such an important role in Meta ethics. Prescriptivism helps to overcome the problem of Reductivism in Emotivism. This is because rational thinking is brought into consideration, prescribing a course of action to be taken rather than solely relying upon our feelings. In conclusion, I think that whether we believe 'right' or 'wrong' to be mere personal preference or to have some deeper meaning, which follows absolute values all, depends on personal opinion. Many would say there is no such thing as an absolute set of values because everything depends on different circumstances as to whether it is right or wrong. Others would say there are some sets of values or morals that are always right, such as striving for peace or happiness. It all depends on which side you base the majority of your decision making; your emotions and feelings or your logic and reasoning. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. TOK Essay: Reason and Emotion

    Throughout Marco Matarazzi of the Italian team, who is a well known for causing other players to loose their temper, was on a mission to make Zidane loose his temper, until five minutes before the end of regulation time he succeeded.

  2. Explain what Scholars means when they say ethical statements are no more than expressions ...

    Furthermore, Ayer's theory of Emotivism can otherwise be known as the Boo/Hurrah theory. So when one says 'Euthanasia is wrong' they are saying 'boo to euthanasia' which expresses negative feelings. In contrast when one says 'Helping the poor is good'; they are saying 'Hurrah to helping the poor', which expresses positive feelings.

  1. "Describe and evaluate Emotivism, showing knowledge of its key thinkers and critics?"

    The first philosopher was A. J Ayer who introduced Emotivism. He believed that there were two types of moral statement. The first was synthetic statements which can be tested by sense experience.

  2. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    The Catholic Church says it is totally wrong, always, as shown in The Catechisms Of The Catholic Church, in which it says; Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having

  1. Utilitarianism (Weaknesses and strengths)

    its extent (number of people that are affected) "When taking ethical decisions, we should be guided by the principle of utility and not by the rules of social custom or convention". This is where Bentham's theory meets difficulties, for example when it allows actions that bring about a big

  2. Different religious and philosophical views on controversial topics.

    Although adultery is only truly committed if the couple is married it is also a sin to have sex out of wedlock, therefore a polygamous relationship is impossible. Even a monogamous relationship is impossible if one is not married. Myself I believe that if all members of a sexual act

  1. Discuss whether moral judgments are subjective or objective

    The idea that we are not responsible for right and wrong to an extent is logical. Our conscience; something believed to be possessed by all humans was not taught or programmed to accept certain actions. It just exists, and thus the belief that morality is in the hands of a higher being is reasonable.

  2. War should never occur. Do you agree? Critically discuss this statement. Include an Christian ...

    Allowing people to believe in things that may be truly wrong and that something they believe in which is completely unjust. I believe that it is only so far for one to peruse their belief before crossing that line. In which their self-interest takes a step too far and so allowing mass murder to happen, which cannot be risked.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work