• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Science does not as yet have a full understanding of the universe. However, it is suggested that with increased technology and theoretical advances, it may be only decades before this is achieved. Do you agree this possible?

Extracts from this document...


Candidate Name: Aisha Jakhura Centre Number: 0960 Candidate Number: 005 Science does not as yet have a full understanding of the universe. However, it is suggested that with increased technology and theoretical advances, it may be only decades before this is achieved. Do you agree this possible? What might be the consequences? Hundreds of thousands of years ago Man discovered fire, the first of a series of discoveries that were to take place, changing the way of life of our species forever. Through these discoveries humans developed what is known as science, defined literally meaning 'a branch of knowledge requiring systematic study and method, especially one of those dealing with substances, animal and vegetable life, and natural laws; natural sciences'. I believe that science has enough power to allow humans to have a larger understanding of the universe than any other living organism on this planet. The extent to which humans have developed since the first discovery of fire serves to underline how much is still capable of being achieved. However I do not consider that science can ever reach a full understanding of the universe. ...read more.


The first planet outside our solar system was not detected until 1994 and in the few years since, 34 have already been found. Is this just the tip of an iceberg? "There is an incredible number of other planets we'll be finding as our search techniques improve, and as scientists continue their quest 'to try to find a habitable Earth' elsewhere in the galaxy."2 Alongside these scientific breakthroughs, commercialisation is also taking place allowing ordinary people to experience the universe of beyond. Such ventures include the 'Artemis Project' claiming to "engage in space flight as a commercial enterprise and establish a permanent, self-supporting community on the Moon."3 The Lunar Resources Company, responsible for this project has placed this advertisement on the Internet: "Our goal is to establish an enduring private space program that opens the path for you to travel in space. Within fifteen years, you will be able to take a two-week trip to the moon at a price you would expect to pay for the luxury-class European capital tour."4 Even Russia's famous 14-year old Mir, the first orbital laboratory that was before long going to be put out of use, was given a new objective. ...read more.


The end to the search for true knowledge always looms in sight, simply as is stated in the question, decades away. However, I believe that secure knowledge can never be found, even with seemingly foolproof theoretical advances and scientific discoveries. Each discovery actually, in the long term, creates more mysteries than it solves. There is an overwhelming belief that every little detail on the huge canvas of the universe is being rapidly filled. Yet what is not realised is that this canvas is always changing. The picture being painted may be more detailed yet the gaps on the canvas are spreading just as fast, if not faster than the paintwork. Knowledge is transient, and it needs to be so otherwise it withers. The search for true knowledge is endless and always will be, but humans will always try to shape the scheme of things to fit their ideas and philosophies. There will always be more to know, more to understand, more to seek. 'We represent reality seeking to understand itself'. 5 WORD COUNT: 1468 1. http://fullcoverage.yahoo.com/fc/Science/New_Planet_Discovery/ Anne Kinney, science program director of NASA's Astronomical Search for Origins program. 2. http://fullcoverage.yahoo.com/fc/Science/New_Planet_Discovery/ Planet-formation expert Alan Boss of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. 3. http://www.asi.org/ 4. http://www.tlrc.com/ 5. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Free essay

    'True' and 'False' seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually ...

    How do they know their theory is 'true'? How does anyone know that either theory is 'true'? What if the confirmation of the scientist's theory is false? But then again, it is only a 'theory', and scientists decided on the "Big Bang" theory probably because it is a theory which

  2. To what extent the Hare Krishna movement can be described as a cult

    The authoritative difference between the cults and Christianity forms a wide chasm. They supplant the biblical structure of the church with isolated unaccountable leadership. They reduce the effectiveness of the written Word of God through new translations and redefining terms.

  1. Man and the Universe

    [Genesis 1:20-22]). * Sixth Day: God brought forth land creatures. Men and Women are created in God's image and power over all the creatures and plants God created. They are commanded to reproduce. ("'Let the earth produce all kinds of animals...and now we will make human beings...They will have power over the fish and birds and all the animals.'"

  2. Examine the claim that one day science will be able to explain everything.

    This mutation would be passed on to its offspring, which would then be born with the same genetic mutation as its parent, thus allowing the survival advantage to be passed through the generations. Over millions of years, animals with the advantageous mutations would live longer, and have a better chance

  1. Examine the differences which may exist between a religious and scientific interpretation of the ...

    therefore be ignored in all potential models, and that the Big Bang. Should be considered as the start of time and also of the Universe. This is in many ways very similar to one of the numerous criticisms Hume had of the cosmological argument, and could be construed as an agreement between science and philosophy.

  2. Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

    Discoveries such as the roundness of the earth and the ability to overtake the speed of sound, perfectly match this sort of definition and so do other discoveries and theories, thought of by humans. Then what can be said about the existence of extraterrestrial beings, or about the life after death?

  1. 'Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?'

    'It' of course is referring to the earth's movement around the sun. These are all proofs. We have then established that the process to achieve knowledge is through belief and proof; hence, knowledge is justified belief. However, proof is not necessarily empirical.

  2. Religion & Science'.

    they believe in the evolution theory. They say that may be six days were as long as the evolution took place. How do we know if the six days were long as twenty-four hours? According to Christianity animals were created during the six days.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work