• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Science does not as yet have a full understanding of the universe. However, it is suggested that with increased technology and theoretical advances, it may be only decades before this is achieved. Do you agree this possible?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Candidate Name: Aisha Jakhura Centre Number: 0960 Candidate Number: 005 Science does not as yet have a full understanding of the universe. However, it is suggested that with increased technology and theoretical advances, it may be only decades before this is achieved. Do you agree this possible? What might be the consequences? Hundreds of thousands of years ago Man discovered fire, the first of a series of discoveries that were to take place, changing the way of life of our species forever. Through these discoveries humans developed what is known as science, defined literally meaning 'a branch of knowledge requiring systematic study and method, especially one of those dealing with substances, animal and vegetable life, and natural laws; natural sciences'. I believe that science has enough power to allow humans to have a larger understanding of the universe than any other living organism on this planet. The extent to which humans have developed since the first discovery of fire serves to underline how much is still capable of being achieved. However I do not consider that science can ever reach a full understanding of the universe. ...read more.

Middle

The first planet outside our solar system was not detected until 1994 and in the few years since, 34 have already been found. Is this just the tip of an iceberg? "There is an incredible number of other planets we'll be finding as our search techniques improve, and as scientists continue their quest 'to try to find a habitable Earth' elsewhere in the galaxy."2 Alongside these scientific breakthroughs, commercialisation is also taking place allowing ordinary people to experience the universe of beyond. Such ventures include the 'Artemis Project' claiming to "engage in space flight as a commercial enterprise and establish a permanent, self-supporting community on the Moon."3 The Lunar Resources Company, responsible for this project has placed this advertisement on the Internet: "Our goal is to establish an enduring private space program that opens the path for you to travel in space. Within fifteen years, you will be able to take a two-week trip to the moon at a price you would expect to pay for the luxury-class European capital tour."4 Even Russia's famous 14-year old Mir, the first orbital laboratory that was before long going to be put out of use, was given a new objective. ...read more.

Conclusion

The end to the search for true knowledge always looms in sight, simply as is stated in the question, decades away. However, I believe that secure knowledge can never be found, even with seemingly foolproof theoretical advances and scientific discoveries. Each discovery actually, in the long term, creates more mysteries than it solves. There is an overwhelming belief that every little detail on the huge canvas of the universe is being rapidly filled. Yet what is not realised is that this canvas is always changing. The picture being painted may be more detailed yet the gaps on the canvas are spreading just as fast, if not faster than the paintwork. Knowledge is transient, and it needs to be so otherwise it withers. The search for true knowledge is endless and always will be, but humans will always try to shape the scheme of things to fit their ideas and philosophies. There will always be more to know, more to understand, more to seek. 'We represent reality seeking to understand itself'. 5 WORD COUNT: 1468 1. http://fullcoverage.yahoo.com/fc/Science/New_Planet_Discovery/ Anne Kinney, science program director of NASA's Astronomical Search for Origins program. 2. http://fullcoverage.yahoo.com/fc/Science/New_Planet_Discovery/ Planet-formation expert Alan Boss of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. 3. http://www.asi.org/ 4. http://www.tlrc.com/ 5. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Free essay

    'True' and 'False' seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually ...

    How do they know their theory is 'true'? How does anyone know that either theory is 'true'? What if the confirmation of the scientist's theory is false? But then again, it is only a 'theory', and scientists decided on the "Big Bang" theory probably because it is a theory which

  2. Man and the Universe

    [Genesis 1:20-22]). * Sixth Day: God brought forth land creatures. Men and Women are created in God's image and power over all the creatures and plants God created. They are commanded to reproduce. ("'Let the earth produce all kinds of animals...and now we will make human beings...They will have power over the fish and birds and all the animals.'"

  1. Examine the differences which may exist between a religious and scientific interpretation of the ...

    Whilst the Hot Big Bang model does offer a plausible explanation as to the creation of the universe, even physicists such as Hawking are fully aware of how unlikely such an event was. In "A Brief History of Time" Hawking recognises that "the initial state of the universe must have

  2. Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

    With the gaining of new and more advanced technologies, man will be able to reach limits never imagined before. In a couple of decades we could be all spending our winter holidays skiing on the, over twenty kilometre high, Olympus Mons, on Mars!

  1. 'Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?'

    However, proof is not necessarily empirical. I may not have seen Australia but I know it exists, similarly I have not seen other planets but I know that they exist. They are facts and I take them to be true because they make sense and there is no proof, to my knowledge, that contradicts these facts.

  2. Religion & Science'.

    They say that this is called soul and God breathes this into every human being when they are in the womb of their mother: 'The Lord God formed the man from the dust of ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living thing.'

  1. "True" and "false" seem to be such clear and simple terms, opposites and mutually ...

    is actually false (for example, during the World War 2, millions believed in whatever Hitler had to say, just because those were the words of the leader). Professionals are more credible, but they, too, make mistakes in their own fields.

  2. "God may have separated the heavens from the earth - He did not separate ...

    evolve through this procedure of adding up all natural laws that have been progressively discovered. But this is not completely true: from single facts nothing can be extracted and all particular facts will continue to be particular if the scientist wouldn't advance a general model, a hypothesis that later will be confirmed as valid or not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work