• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Should America have gone to war against Iraq?"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

22/12/03 Discursive Essay Kughan Malairaj "Should America have gone to war against Iraq?" This is a discursive essay for the argument against America going to war with Iraq. In this essay, I will briefly include a summary about Iraq and go on to give evidence about previous incidents and other significant points that finally led to the war early this year. Iraq is a dictatorship that was under the rule of the tyrant Saddam Hussein until the coalition forces invaded and toppled the Iraqi regime. Saddam Hussein officially became a dictator in the year 1979. Since then, he has caused many disruptions and has terribly ruled Iraq. Saddam was supported by the military of Iraq and he was a really brutal man. The people of Iraq were tortured and murdered under this dictator. There was a time where Saddam was interested in developing weapons to fight against other countries. At that time, Iraq did not have close links with neighbouring countries such as Iran. Saddam Hussein the saw Iran as a slightly vulnerable country and started a conflict with its neighbour. Hisorically, there were differences between Iraq and Iran. ...read more.

Middle

Any one who goes against him would be slaughtered, buried alive or tortured in the meanest way. America was then worried about the safety of its people and world peace. "Would the world be safe with a regime like that in existence?" Over the years, America developed this hatred for Iraq and the UN kept hunting down this suspicion of weapons of mass destruction. UN inspectors were sent to different parts of Iraq in order to search for these "terror" weapons. If Saddam Hussein was to get hold of these lethal weapons, the safety of the world and especially America would be threatened. October 1998, this was the time where the Iraqis forced the UN weapons inspectors to leave. No sign of weapons of mass destruction was to be seen. "Were there actually any weapons of mass destruction?" This was the question that many people were thinking of. Some people claim that it was the false statement made by America to condemn Iraq as a "terrorist-based" country. It was not the people that were to be blamed, but Saddam Hussein and his evil regime. In 1999, Iraq rejected the UN resolution, thus not allowing any weapons inspectors to come into the country in search for these weapons. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Invasion of Iraq was from March 19-20. This was a coalition force consisting of US and UK forces. It beginned with air strikes to take out enemy structures and it was mainly to target members of the Iraqi regime. Later on, the troops started invading Iraq and Iraqis tried to defend their land by using any force available to them. The war went on until the regime was annihilated. There were many casualties of the war, some innocent civilians. Until now, there were no weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq. President Bush took drastic action on Iraq without any reason. There were not also complete backing from the international community to proceed in this war. Going to war is not a very democratic decision and America should have tried other civilised ways to deal with Iraq. America's plans were to go in and find weapons of mass destruction and to get rid of the Iraqi regime. They did not need to go to war to do this. The war claimed many lives of civilians and soldiers and over $93 billion spent. This money could be used for better purposes such as helping poor countries and funding useful projects. Fortunately, the leader of the regime, Saddam Hussien was finally captured later in early December 2003. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Morality of War section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Morality of War essays

  1. Nelson Mandela, "Little more than a terrorist" or "An abused leader of his people"?

    On the surface this looks like a fair compromise, Mandela says that he will never use violence again and they will let him out. But this makes Mandela look like a terrorist because if he says that he will

  2. Biological weapons

    We can also see that the use of biological weapon cannot protect yourself, I mean that if you start a biological attack, you can also be touched by it; and we could think that this danger would prevent some biological attacks because people would be afraid to put their own lives in danger to create massive damage on a population.

  1. Religion and politics

    Many of the Ten Commandments deal with social relations. To say that God is not interested in politics is to say that God is not interested in social ethics. Individuals cannot be separated from society; thus, there can be no clear distinction between ethics and politics. Artistole was right in saying that "man is a political animal."

  2. Biological terrorism.

    Biological warfare against crops is a way that third world countries are beginning to fight without killing anyone. Iraq began designing an anti crop agent in the early 1990's. It came from experiments performed on human killing agents like anthrax, butolism and aflatoxin.

  1. Should There be War in Iraq?

    In 2004 a 1,500 page report has been released by Charles A. Duelfer, the CIA's top adviser on Iraqi weapons. It states proof of Hussein importing banned materials, and also declares Iraqi plans of reviving 2 WMD programs and maintaining a dual-use industrial sector that could produce illegal weapons.

  2. Barrington Dyer and develops the inception of this report, its thesis, and motivation as ...

    After Americans endured four excruciating days of uncertainty about the future, pressure was put on the American government to insure that such a close call never happened again and, in an effort to do so, several treaties were signed and conventions adopted.

  1. Examine the arguments for and against Britain going to war to disarm Iraq of ...

    In addition during the Gulf War, Iraq possessed chemical and biological weapons but refused to use them, even when they were defeated in Kuwait and allied forces pushed over the Iraqi border. They didn't use them during any of the time period since the Gulf War.

  2. War on Iraq.

    I seriously would not want to put it off if it is just going to buy Saddam Hussein time to produce his nuclear weapon along with his other weapons of mass destruction. I really don't want to live to see that day.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work