• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Britain reintroduce the death sentence?

Extracts from this document...


Should Britain reintroduce the death sentence? The death sentence is given to people who have committed murder of any kind. It has been around for hundreds of years and has been used in many different ways. It was abolished in Britain a long time ago. This essay will look at the question 'should Britain reintroduce the death sentence?' It will contain my own comments and arguments for and against bringing back the death penalty. The death sentence can be used as to deter potential murderers from committing murder. The view is that if the potential murderer sees what the consequence is of committing murder, they will think twice about committing it. Unfortunately this does not always work because in states of anger people do not realise the consequence. However it is a relatively good way of deterring criminals because they would not want to end up dead. I think this is a good way of using the death sentence and eventually all the murders will be abolished. ...read more.


There is also a chance that the life sentence given will not be fully carried out. Usually the convicted person is let out after just a few years. If the convict has not learnt their lesson they may still commit murder and keep doing it. However, to kill these people is a violation of Human Rights. Also, to treat these people in a bad way such as torture is a violation of human rights. The Human Rights act clearly states that humans should not be subjected to torture or degrading punishment and that it is every person's right to live life. Amnesty international also argue that ' the death penalty is wrong, it is a violation of human rights' A counter argument to this is that if every human has a right to live than what about the person who was murdered? What justice is it that the victim is derived of his/her life and the person who wrongly took that life is put in jail to live a relatively comfortable life? ...read more.


However, if Capital Punishment were to be brought back they would be treated the same and would still be executed. This cannot be right and proves that the death sentence is unfair and a waste of time. Even if a person was not in full control of himself or herself, they still committed the murder and justice should still be paid. One could argue 'why were they not in a hospital or care home'. The family of the victim have still lost a loved one and would want justice served no matter about the mental state of the murderer. My personal view is that the death sentence should be brought back to Britain. Both sides make a very good argument but I think the 'for' makes a better argument. I think that if we brought back the death penalty there would be a lot less murders and Britain would be a better place to live in. Gangs would eventually be eliminated and in areas where there is more crime people would feel safer because eventually the gangs and yardies etc would be gone. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. What is a human being?

    Some pro-choicers that personhood does not happen at conception. They say that the just fertilized egg has no limbs, no head, no brain no ability to see or hear, taste, touch, smell, no internal organs, no ability to think, reason, sense it's environment, etc. even at one month it can not be distinguished from the embryo of a cat or dog.

  2. Is an eye for an eye a legal remedy in the 21st century?

    penalty.xiv The age at what someone can be subject to the death penalty differs from state to state. xvThe act of this prosecution indefinitely breaches the rights of humans, especially the young who are the future generation. The international human rights treaties that forbid the execution of anyone under 18

  1. My view on Euthanasia.

    Therefore I believe that euthanasia with consent in one way or another is morally permissible in most circumstances. The moral permissibility of euthanasia without consent now must be considered. Everybody has a right to choose to die if they want to.

  2. Capital Punishment - Justice or Murder? - Joe should never be set free, ...

    While they were still alive their insides were cut out and later burnt. They were cut up into four pieces and displayed in the street for passers by to see. In Roman times, Christians would tie people to the ground to be eaten alive by animals.

  1. Let's Give murderers What they Deserve - the Death penalty.Explain the arguments for and ...

    Or how about rape and making love - both may end with sexual intercourse. These are obviously absurd. Capital punishment protesters flawed logic, and confusion mirror their 'factual' arguments sometimes there is an absence of reality. Some people equate the Americans having the death penalty with the Nazi holocaust regime.

  2. Should the UK reintroduce the death penalty?

    Even people for the death penalty acknowledge that there is no deterrent affect of killing murderers but the argument is that if we do not kill the murderers we have effectively allowed the killing of innocent people.

  1. "Society in 2005 wants to re-introduce the death penalty in prisons

    I will show the statistics of my questions using the Microsoft Excel programme to show them in chart form. Here are three more of my questions and results: This bar chart shows the statistics for the different views on the death penalty by different age groups and whether that are

  2. Speed Kills.

    This is because the faster you travel the more likely you are to miss important hazard cues. When you do recognise a hazard you will travel further before applying the brakes. Once the brakes are applied, you will travel further before you actually stop.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work