• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Capital Punishment be allowed or not?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should Capital Punishment be allowed or not? According to a dictionary a crime is `an act punishable by law, as being forbidden by statute or injurious to the public welfare'. Sounds straight forward, but particularly the way that crime is interpreted and acted upon is very controversial. One of these controversial matters is capital punishment. Basically capital punishment is the death sentence as punishment for crimes such as murder. Whether capital punishment should be allowed or not has led to a lot of arguments. The Arguments: Some may say capital punishment is a bit too far, as they are concerned that someone could be wrongly accused and this is only found out about after he/she has been executed. Against this people may dispute that murder cases are investigated so thoroughly that mistakes like this would not happen. ...read more.

Middle

The pro-hanging lobby uses the argument that a person about to commit a murder would think twice if he knew that he might be executed if he was found out. Statistics show that this is untrue as murder rates in places where the death sentence is enforced usually show no difference or sometimes are higher than that in places without a death penalty, even when they are neighbouring U.S. states. Some have the opinion that when a convicted criminal is sentenced to life it should mean life not twenty-five or usually fewer years. So the convicts should be imprisoned until they die or be executed by means of electric chair or lethal injection etc. Over 85% of people in USA voted in agreement for the death penalty, and it is estimated that a similar amount in Britain would feel the same way. ...read more.

Conclusion

I think that the pro hanging lobby's main argument of `a person may think twice about committing a murder if they knew he might be executed' is disproved by the murder rate statistics. I think that you can't really counter the statement `life should mean life not twenty-five years' otherwise why is it called a life sentence. I also agree that it is the government's job to put in place some system of law and order or there would just be anarchy. Overall I think that capital punishment should only be allowed in cases where it is dead certain who has committed the crime, so to stop people being executed for things that they haven't done. I believe that it is something that will be argued about for many years to come and it will be a very long time until it will be decided upon. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Capital punishment - One of the most controversial debates that rages constantly in this ...

    There are many facets to this argument, and even an updated Supreme Court ruling is unlikely to quell the debate. There is also another very contentious point in the debate over capital punishment. Obviously, the penalty of death is the most final punishment possible.

  2. An Essay on Crime, what Capital Punishment is, my own view and also the ...

    Capital punishment adequately expresses societies total abhorrence of murder or crimes of equal disgust. Capital punishment if it were in use shows in reality the way society thinks about people that commit such crimes and how these crimes will not be tolerated. One of human natures natural reactions is revenge.

  1. Capital Punishment should not be allowed ...

    the rope of law is fine but getting killed by the hand of criminal is crime (metaphor). According to the report of USA 47% of the 4500 cases were overturned by the future evidences that proved they were innocent, many of those persons were already executed so there was nothing they could do about it.

  2. The British Penal System

    CAPITAL PUNISHMENT- MORALLY DEFENSIBLE? Capital punishment is the punishment of death due to the act of a serious crime usually the killing or murder of someone. Throughout the years the justifying of whether or not to implement this punishment has been very debatable and in fact the UK abolished this sentence from its legal system in 1969.

  1. Is an eye for an eye a legal remedy in the 21st century?

    When the signing of the Declaration of Human Rights took place it was considered that each of these countries would apply these everyday human rights to their society. The US has signed the Declaration however they have breached many of the rights by exercising the death penalty.

  2. My view on Euthanasia.

    Who is to choose whether a person should die or not when the person cannot make the decision on his or her own, and there was no previous decision made? If no decision was previously made, and no consent can be given at the present time, then can a decision be made on the life or death of another?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work