• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the death penalty be used lawfully in civilised society

Extracts from this document...


SHOULD THE DEATH PENALTY BE USED LAWFULLY IN CIVILISED SOCIETY? Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as 'capital crimes' or 'capital offenses'. Historically, the execution of criminals and political opponents was used by nearly all societies both to punish crime and to suppress political dissent. Most European and Latin American states have abolished capital punishment. Some of the countries that still use the death penalty are, Afghanistan, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Chad, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Iran, Iraq, Jamaica, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, St Lucia, Saudi Arabia, Trinidad and Tobago, USA, Zimbabwe, and many more. In most places, the death penalty is reserved as a punishment for premeditated murder, espionage, treason, or as part of military justice. In most Muslim countries sexual crimes, including adultery and sodomy carry the death penalty, as do religious crimes such as apostasy. In some countries, drug trafficking is a capital offense. In China, human trafficking and serious cases of corruption are also punished by the death penalty. In militaries all over the world, the Court Martials have given the death penalty for offenses such as cowardice, desertion, insubordination, and mutiny. Capital punishment was last used in Britain in 1964, but was totally outlawed on 20th May 1999. Because Britain is now in the EU, there is now hardly any possibility that the death penalty will ever be brought back. ...read more.


The 883, 593 prisoners are costing the American taxpayers $19.4 billion. Why should we, the taxpayers/the victims, support these criminals?' By executing criminals, tax money that would otherwise have been spent on more prisons and food, could be used for something more useful. Thus the economy benefits from the death penalty, plus it helps lower the number of people in the prisons. Jessica Spinler on execution says, 'executions maximise public safety through a form of incapacitation and deterrence.' Incapacitating a person is depriving the criminal of physical or intellectual power. Deterrence is discouraging and preventing an action from happening. The possibility of execution would give a pause in the process of a murder, using fear to prevent the crime. Execution would forcibly prevent the recurrence of violence, as without the criminal, there would be no crime. Abolitionists of the death penalty believe that someone can do more alive than dead. By working, the criminal pays back society, the community, and also their victim and the victim's family. One of the most well known examples of the criminal contributing to society is the case of Leopold and Loeb. Leopold and Loeb were 19 years old when they committed 'The Crime of the Century'. In 1924 they kidnapped and murdered a 14 year old boy just to see what it was like. They were both spared the death penalty and sentenced to life imprisonment. Together, their accomplishments include working at hospitals, teaching illiterates to read, creating a correspondence school, and writing a grammar book. ...read more.


When the police arrived at the break in, Derek's friend had a gun, Derek was convicted on the words "let him have it" when a policeman approached. The friend then shot the policeman. The words that he spoke had two meanings, and nobody knows which meaning he meant - either 'give him the gun' or 'shoot him'. Derek was of limited intelligence (mental age of 11), easily influenced, and unable to read or write. He was wrongly convicted for the crime, and then hung when he was only the mental age of 11, which is disgraceful, not only in the eyes of the public, but in the eyes of the future government, who should be ashamed for sending somebody of the mental age of 11 to the gallows. Even the thought is sickening, as it is like sending a small child to die. Even though the supporters of the death penalty have some interesting arguments, I feel that the abolitionists view contains much more stronger reasons for its views, the first of which is that the death penalty is wrong morally because it is the cruel and inhuman taking of a human life. The methods by which executions are carried out can involve physical torture. Nobody, in my opinion, has the authority to play God. Execution is not legalised murder, just like imprisonment isn't legalised kidnapping. It lowers the government to the moral level of the criminal. One of the ironies of capital punishment is that it focuses attention and sympathy on the criminal, when they should be humiliated by having to spend the rest of their lives in prison. Zara Smalley The Death Penalty 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Death Penalty Opinion.

    With these examples, how can this be a humane way to kill some one. These aren't animals that are put to sleep at the vet, these are human beings. These animals, as we treat them, can still feel pain, they know suffering, and they still have rights.

  2. Black Death, epidemic of plague which ravaged Europe in the mid-14th century.

    For those seeking easy explanations of the spread of disease, the usual outcasts of society could be blamed. In some areas beggars and the very poor were accused of contaminating ordinary folk. In those parts of Europe where the Jews were tolerated, popular fury turned against them.

  1. Critically evaluate arguments for and against the death penalty.

    Abolitionists, firstly, argue that this is an irreversible form of punishment so any mistake would be fatal. This has proven to be the strongest argument against the death penalty because the death of an innocent individual causes much concern about the system.

  2. Capital punishment is barbaric and inhumane.

    For particularly heinous crimes, as demonstrated by the sentence imposed on Martin Bryant, who was responsible for the Port Arthur massacres, he was indicted for 35 counts of murder and sentenced to imprisonment for the term of his natural life sentence" (Syme, 1997, parole must never be granted and an escape would be impossible with maximum security incarcerating such offenders.

  1. Is the death penalty the best protection from a murderer? Is justice for the ...

    After a few months of investigation, they successfully proved that Anthony Porter was completely innocent and had nothing to do with the killings, the true killer was another man. Luckily, Mr. Porter was released just 48 hours before the execution, he was spared because of the informal efforts of concerned citizens, not because of the justice system.

  2. Let's Give murderers What they Deserve - the Death penalty.Explain the arguments for and ...

    Also, states that abolished the death penalty, but then reintroduced it showed no change in the murder rate. Thirdly, following executions, there was no change in the murder rate around the city where the execution took place. Many anti-capital punishment protesters say there is a lot of racism when it comes to sentencing people to death i.e..

  1. How does Peter Medak gain the viewer's sympathy for Derek Bentley in the film ...

    This becomes a crucial part of the film as it is one of Derek's main problems that he goes through during is life. Medak focuses on the eyes of Bentley during the fit, which make's the audience feel very sad and they do feel sorry for him.

  2. Compare and contrast the themes of death in Everyman and Morality Play

    The irony of a corrupt priest being the hero of the novel, I feel is Barry Unsworth's attempt at changing the conventions of the morality play as the protagonist is no longer striving to be a good Christian but instead Nicholas Barber is attempting to avoid punishment from the church for his sins.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work