• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Voluntary Euthanasia be allowed in Hong Kong?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should Voluntary Euthanasia be allowed in Hong Kong? The word Euthanasia originated from the Greek language: eu meaning "good" and thanatos meaning "death". Another meaning given to the word is "the intentional termination of life by another at the explicit request of the person who dies." This actually implies that the euthanasia be instigated by the person who wishes to die unfortunately, some definitions of euthanasia include involuntary as well as voluntary termination of life and many moral, ethical or religious terms have different meanings resulting in mass confusion. I believe that voluntary euthanasia, the suicide of a person who has explicitly requested to end his life, should be allowed in Hong Kong. I believe that life is extremely precious and should not go to waste especially if there is are promising decades to come but if a person is terminally ill and their quality of life has fallen so far that they do not wish to continue living or if they end up in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) and feel that being constantly cared after is an unacceptable loss of dignity, then they should be allowed to consider voluntary passive euthanasia as an option. When considering whether or not to pass a law allowing or condemning euthanasia, it is important to consider all the factors involved including the patient's will and well-being as well as his kin, the physicians as well as the consequences. ...read more.

Middle

It would also cause pain to see a loved family member lying on a hospital bed inanimate, feeble, and helpless - there definitely would be some doubt whether there is really any purpose in sustaining the hollow shell of a body further. It is a fact that in North America, 40% of passive euthanasia is performed after protracted, agonizing indecision on part of family members and physicians. Family would also be at ease of mind that the patient died peacefully in sleep rather than an agonizing, lingering and unduly painful semi-existence. It is known statistically from research that many patients die excessively painful deaths due to the ignorance, lack of experience or training in physicians and the lack in medical technology and better drugs to be administered as well as monetary costs. The family would also be financially better off because of the termination protecting assets from large medical expenses incurred by approaching death. Then apart from the patient's rights and a family's well being, the downsides and consequences must also be considered. Some downsides of legalising voluntary euthanasia includes deception of the physician or the patient into performing euthanasia in order for some benefit to befall e.g. a large sum insurance and the swindler as beneficiary. ...read more.

Conclusion

Such situations could be avoided that if the doctor suspects that the patient suffers from depression, he should be sent for psychiatric evaluation and the written request for euthanasia or physician assisted euthanasia to be doubled and written with a period of at least 15 days in between. I am opposed to active euthanasia because I believe that without a concrete proof of the wishes of the patient, that his or her life should be sustained indefinitely until nature calls, but advocate to voluntary euthanasia as it is well within the rights of the patient to decide what's best for him and to consider the emotional and financial impacts upon his family. I emphasise that euthanasia and active euthanasia must not be accepted as good medical treatment because this places the right to kill in physician's hands for if the notion is accepted it would not only be inappropriate, but discriminatory, to deny this 'good' treatment to a patient solely because that person is too young or mentally incapacitated to request it. Properly regulated voluntary euthanasia protects the patient from abuse and ensures that the decision to end his life is made openly, honestly and voluntarily by the patient. Legalising euthanasia in Hong Kong will allow the terminally ill and comatose, through different pathways, to obtain a dignified and peaceful end. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    I believe this is no different to Euthanasia because it is one person ending another person's suffering. However, someone not on a ventilator yet undergoing unbearable amounts of pain is not allowed to have someone end their life for them.

  2. What is meant by euthanasia?

    They argue that a patient with PVS has the same value and dignity as it did when they patient was fit and well. Turning off the life support machine could be the best solution in some situations, but a shocking research at the Royal Hospital for Neuro-Disability, who led the

  1. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    by withholding treatment Yes 68% No 31% b. by withdrawing treatment Yes 67% No `32% c) by administering pain killers in the knowledge that they are likely to shorten life? Yes 60% No 37% d) by prescribing lethal drugs for patients to take themselves? Yes 18% No 75% Do you believe in a patient's right to die?

  2. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    Euthanasia is no different form having a pet put down or put to sleep, because why should a human suffer more than an animal before it is put to rest.

  1. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    In Australia, Kevin Andrews introduced The Euthanasia Law Bill 1996 into the House of Representatives on 9 September 1996 as a Private Member's Bill. The aim of the bill was to take away the power of the legislative assemblies of the Northern Territory, the Australian Capital Territory and Norfolk

  2. What are the religious and ethical considerations to the issue of euthanasia?

    This may be true in certain places , and we are aware that euthanasia takes place even though it is not legal but in the eyes of the law it is not left up to the person. The law causes problems when euthanaisa come in to play as it is

  1. Is Euthanasia accepted within Society? ...

    may consider that, their quality of life has been reduced and they may not want to continue living. Anybody who's had a family member with cancer or any other long-term disease knows that it is a real challenge to the mind as well as the body.

  2. Euthanasia- coursework on Christian belief, ethical philosophers and that of the medical establishment.

    Christians hold the Bible to be the revealed word of God and I find this lucid information in my approach to euthanasia, and how Christian belief is not compatible with it. I find that from scripture that the biblical concept of justice is balanced by the biblical concept of mercy

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work