• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Voluntary Euthanasia be allowed in Hong Kong?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should Voluntary Euthanasia be allowed in Hong Kong? The word Euthanasia originated from the Greek language: eu meaning "good" and thanatos meaning "death". Another meaning given to the word is "the intentional termination of life by another at the explicit request of the person who dies." This actually implies that the euthanasia be instigated by the person who wishes to die unfortunately, some definitions of euthanasia include involuntary as well as voluntary termination of life and many moral, ethical or religious terms have different meanings resulting in mass confusion. I believe that voluntary euthanasia, the suicide of a person who has explicitly requested to end his life, should be allowed in Hong Kong. I believe that life is extremely precious and should not go to waste especially if there is are promising decades to come but if a person is terminally ill and their quality of life has fallen so far that they do not wish to continue living or if they end up in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) and feel that being constantly cared after is an unacceptable loss of dignity, then they should be allowed to consider voluntary passive euthanasia as an option. When considering whether or not to pass a law allowing or condemning euthanasia, it is important to consider all the factors involved including the patient's will and well-being as well as his kin, the physicians as well as the consequences. ...read more.

Middle

It would also cause pain to see a loved family member lying on a hospital bed inanimate, feeble, and helpless - there definitely would be some doubt whether there is really any purpose in sustaining the hollow shell of a body further. It is a fact that in North America, 40% of passive euthanasia is performed after protracted, agonizing indecision on part of family members and physicians. Family would also be at ease of mind that the patient died peacefully in sleep rather than an agonizing, lingering and unduly painful semi-existence. It is known statistically from research that many patients die excessively painful deaths due to the ignorance, lack of experience or training in physicians and the lack in medical technology and better drugs to be administered as well as monetary costs. The family would also be financially better off because of the termination protecting assets from large medical expenses incurred by approaching death. Then apart from the patient's rights and a family's well being, the downsides and consequences must also be considered. Some downsides of legalising voluntary euthanasia includes deception of the physician or the patient into performing euthanasia in order for some benefit to befall e.g. a large sum insurance and the swindler as beneficiary. ...read more.

Conclusion

Such situations could be avoided that if the doctor suspects that the patient suffers from depression, he should be sent for psychiatric evaluation and the written request for euthanasia or physician assisted euthanasia to be doubled and written with a period of at least 15 days in between. I am opposed to active euthanasia because I believe that without a concrete proof of the wishes of the patient, that his or her life should be sustained indefinitely until nature calls, but advocate to voluntary euthanasia as it is well within the rights of the patient to decide what's best for him and to consider the emotional and financial impacts upon his family. I emphasise that euthanasia and active euthanasia must not be accepted as good medical treatment because this places the right to kill in physician's hands for if the notion is accepted it would not only be inappropriate, but discriminatory, to deny this 'good' treatment to a patient solely because that person is too young or mentally incapacitated to request it. Properly regulated voluntary euthanasia protects the patient from abuse and ensures that the decision to end his life is made openly, honestly and voluntarily by the patient. Legalising euthanasia in Hong Kong will allow the terminally ill and comatose, through different pathways, to obtain a dignified and peaceful end. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    I believe this is no different to Euthanasia because it is one person ending another person's suffering. However, someone not on a ventilator yet undergoing unbearable amounts of pain is not allowed to have someone end their life for them.

  2. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    So is an acceptance of the practice of voluntary euthanasia incompatible with the Christian belief in the sanctity of life but not with the attitudes of some ethical philosophers and medical practitioners? The acceptance of Voluntary euthanasia has very mixed views from both Ethicists and Doctors.

  1. What is meant by euthanasia?

    In this case, it has proved their commitment and abilities. If a patient dies in the hands of a doctor, the doctor should not be jailed, because after all they are trying to do their job. However if a doctor blatantly committed murder, in this case, by all means they would and should be sentenced to jail.

  2. What are the religious and ethical considerations to the issue of euthanasia?

    Yet people still have doubts. Kuhse agrees that the the following concern could take place in our society if euthanasia were to be legalised.The wedge argument ( or slippery slope argument ) maintains that euthanasia is the thin end of the wedge - that once one accepts this principle, the door is open for all sorts of other procedures and abuses including infanticide.

  1. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    History has shown clearly that once voluntary euthanasia is legal, involuntary euthanasia follows. The British House of Lords recently recommended no change to the law on euthanasia after an extensive enquiry and in view of increasing public interest in euthanasia.

  2. Euthanasia- coursework on Christian belief, ethical philosophers and that of the medical establishment.

    People who are in severe pain with a terminally ill disease, or whose quality of life is non-existent should be allowed the right to seek assistance if necessary. * Sometimes a terminal illness is so painful that it causes life to be an unbearable burden; death can represent a relief of intolerable pain.

  1. Evaluate the Ethical Arguments For and Against Voluntary Euthanasia

    If it was legalised then it would show consistency. Both would be carried out for the same reason of lessening the amount of pain suffered by the patient. Only the means are different, the intentions are the same. The type of euthanasia that will be discussed is voluntary euthanasia and

  2. 'Acceptance of the practice of voluntary Euthanasia is incompatible with the Christian belief in ...

    The body is a temple (sacred place) dedicated to God for him to use; 'Don't you know that you are God's temple and that God's spirit lives in you. If anyone destroys God's temple then God will destroy him; for God's temple is sacred and you are that temple' (Corinthians 3v 16,17).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work