• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Voluntary Euthanasia be allowed in Hong Kong?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should Voluntary Euthanasia be allowed in Hong Kong? The word Euthanasia originated from the Greek language: eu meaning "good" and thanatos meaning "death". Another meaning given to the word is "the intentional termination of life by another at the explicit request of the person who dies." This actually implies that the euthanasia be instigated by the person who wishes to die unfortunately, some definitions of euthanasia include involuntary as well as voluntary termination of life and many moral, ethical or religious terms have different meanings resulting in mass confusion. I believe that voluntary euthanasia, the suicide of a person who has explicitly requested to end his life, should be allowed in Hong Kong. I believe that life is extremely precious and should not go to waste especially if there is are promising decades to come but if a person is terminally ill and their quality of life has fallen so far that they do not wish to continue living or if they end up in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) and feel that being constantly cared after is an unacceptable loss of dignity, then they should be allowed to consider voluntary passive euthanasia as an option. When considering whether or not to pass a law allowing or condemning euthanasia, it is important to consider all the factors involved including the patient's will and well-being as well as his kin, the physicians as well as the consequences. ...read more.

Middle

It would also cause pain to see a loved family member lying on a hospital bed inanimate, feeble, and helpless - there definitely would be some doubt whether there is really any purpose in sustaining the hollow shell of a body further. It is a fact that in North America, 40% of passive euthanasia is performed after protracted, agonizing indecision on part of family members and physicians. Family would also be at ease of mind that the patient died peacefully in sleep rather than an agonizing, lingering and unduly painful semi-existence. It is known statistically from research that many patients die excessively painful deaths due to the ignorance, lack of experience or training in physicians and the lack in medical technology and better drugs to be administered as well as monetary costs. The family would also be financially better off because of the termination protecting assets from large medical expenses incurred by approaching death. Then apart from the patient's rights and a family's well being, the downsides and consequences must also be considered. Some downsides of legalising voluntary euthanasia includes deception of the physician or the patient into performing euthanasia in order for some benefit to befall e.g. a large sum insurance and the swindler as beneficiary. ...read more.

Conclusion

Such situations could be avoided that if the doctor suspects that the patient suffers from depression, he should be sent for psychiatric evaluation and the written request for euthanasia or physician assisted euthanasia to be doubled and written with a period of at least 15 days in between. I am opposed to active euthanasia because I believe that without a concrete proof of the wishes of the patient, that his or her life should be sustained indefinitely until nature calls, but advocate to voluntary euthanasia as it is well within the rights of the patient to decide what's best for him and to consider the emotional and financial impacts upon his family. I emphasise that euthanasia and active euthanasia must not be accepted as good medical treatment because this places the right to kill in physician's hands for if the notion is accepted it would not only be inappropriate, but discriminatory, to deny this 'good' treatment to a patient solely because that person is too young or mentally incapacitated to request it. Properly regulated voluntary euthanasia protects the patient from abuse and ensures that the decision to end his life is made openly, honestly and voluntarily by the patient. Legalising euthanasia in Hong Kong will allow the terminally ill and comatose, through different pathways, to obtain a dignified and peaceful end. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    * No person should be made to stay alive against their own will No one should be forced to stay in a county where they are made to stay alive. In this instance, Diane Pretty's case can be brought up.

  2. What is meant by euthanasia?

    (13) Suicide is sometimes talked about with euthanasia. 85% of the people thought that suicide is never justified because, as I said in the previous question, the decision to commit suicide is often temporary. (14) 71% of the beliefs about the euthanasia came from a personal and moral viewpoint.

  1. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    Finally they can terminate the life in a medically appropriate fashion. Diane Pretty, 42, on August 2001, made the first legal challenge to Britain's law on euthanasia. Diane, who can hardly move or speak and has to be fed through a tube, is challenging the decision of the director of

  2. Evaluate the Ethical Arguments For and Against Voluntary Euthanasia

    This can be determined when there is an absence of eye-opening, an absence of verbal and motor response to pain and the loss of brainstem reflexes. If there is evidence that the damage done to the brain is irreversible, then the person is brain dead.

  1. Euthanasia- coursework on Christian belief, ethical philosophers and that of the medical establishment.

    Of course, there is a significant and growing percentage of Agnostics, Atheists, Humanists, secularists; ethical philosophers and some medical establishment that do not accept these theologically based arguments. They might argue; * Each person has autonomy over his or her own life.

  2. The Language of Euthanasia

    Confusion has clearly reined throughout society about the exact meaning of Euthanasia. This is clearly illustrated in the article with the example of the CBC talk show host. In this particular example the host is provided with a faulty definition instead of the more precise medical definition of Euthanasia.

  1. 'Acceptance of the practice of voluntary Euthanasia is incompatible with the Christian belief in ...

    us that lives on after death and that we have been given an opportunity to have a relationship with God. It is believed in the sanctity of life argument that humans have been created in 'God's image'. This means humans have certain qualities and characteristics that God had, for example,

  2. Religius problem

    ? ????????, ????? ?????????? ??, ??? ????????????? ????????????. ?? ?????? ????????? ???? ??????? ??????????? ?????? ??? ????????. ????????? ??????? ? ???????? ??????????? ? ???, ? ?? ??????????? ????? ?????? ????? ??????, ???????? ??? ?????????? ???? ? ??????????. ?? ??????????? ? ?????? ? ??????. ???????????????????????????????? ? ??????????????, ?? ?????? ????

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work