• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Voluntary Euthanasia be allowed in Hong Kong?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Should Voluntary Euthanasia be allowed in Hong Kong? The word Euthanasia originated from the Greek language: eu meaning "good" and thanatos meaning "death". Another meaning given to the word is "the intentional termination of life by another at the explicit request of the person who dies." This actually implies that the euthanasia be instigated by the person who wishes to die unfortunately, some definitions of euthanasia include involuntary as well as voluntary termination of life and many moral, ethical or religious terms have different meanings resulting in mass confusion. I believe that voluntary euthanasia, the suicide of a person who has explicitly requested to end his life, should be allowed in Hong Kong. I believe that life is extremely precious and should not go to waste especially if there is are promising decades to come but if a person is terminally ill and their quality of life has fallen so far that they do not wish to continue living or if they end up in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) and feel that being constantly cared after is an unacceptable loss of dignity, then they should be allowed to consider voluntary passive euthanasia as an option. When considering whether or not to pass a law allowing or condemning euthanasia, it is important to consider all the factors involved including the patient's will and well-being as well as his kin, the physicians as well as the consequences. ...read more.

Middle

It would also cause pain to see a loved family member lying on a hospital bed inanimate, feeble, and helpless - there definitely would be some doubt whether there is really any purpose in sustaining the hollow shell of a body further. It is a fact that in North America, 40% of passive euthanasia is performed after protracted, agonizing indecision on part of family members and physicians. Family would also be at ease of mind that the patient died peacefully in sleep rather than an agonizing, lingering and unduly painful semi-existence. It is known statistically from research that many patients die excessively painful deaths due to the ignorance, lack of experience or training in physicians and the lack in medical technology and better drugs to be administered as well as monetary costs. The family would also be financially better off because of the termination protecting assets from large medical expenses incurred by approaching death. Then apart from the patient's rights and a family's well being, the downsides and consequences must also be considered. Some downsides of legalising voluntary euthanasia includes deception of the physician or the patient into performing euthanasia in order for some benefit to befall e.g. a large sum insurance and the swindler as beneficiary. ...read more.

Conclusion

Such situations could be avoided that if the doctor suspects that the patient suffers from depression, he should be sent for psychiatric evaluation and the written request for euthanasia or physician assisted euthanasia to be doubled and written with a period of at least 15 days in between. I am opposed to active euthanasia because I believe that without a concrete proof of the wishes of the patient, that his or her life should be sustained indefinitely until nature calls, but advocate to voluntary euthanasia as it is well within the rights of the patient to decide what's best for him and to consider the emotional and financial impacts upon his family. I emphasise that euthanasia and active euthanasia must not be accepted as good medical treatment because this places the right to kill in physician's hands for if the notion is accepted it would not only be inappropriate, but discriminatory, to deny this 'good' treatment to a patient solely because that person is too young or mentally incapacitated to request it. Properly regulated voluntary euthanasia protects the patient from abuse and ensures that the decision to end his life is made openly, honestly and voluntarily by the patient. Legalising euthanasia in Hong Kong will allow the terminally ill and comatose, through different pathways, to obtain a dignified and peaceful end. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    Diana Pretty was diagnosed with Motor Neurone disease which is a fatal condition. This disease gradually progresses through the body to cause muscle damage and wastage. While suffering from this disease she made a wish, she wanted to die through Euthanasia so she could be peaceful and say goodbye to her family while she was still able to.

  2. What is meant by euthanasia?

    Different people have different definitions of euthanasia. It is not surprising that with euthanasia meaning different things to different people, why there have been so many debates on this issue and so many confusions. Some people oppose to euthanasia. They, like a lot of Christians, believe that death is merely an event in life and not the end.

  1. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    public prosecutions to prosecute her husband if he helps her to commit suicide. Richard Lamerton, a spokesman of one of the campaigners against legalising euthanasia added, "Once you have killed somebody they have no rights and no choice. It would leave the door open to all sorts of dubious decisions

  2. What are the religious and ethical considerations to the issue of euthanasia?

    J Glover (1977) notes that people in these situations sometimes commit suicide.On the other hand they could be presseured into asking to be euthinased by family or friends due to things such as money or housing. Lord McColl , the professor of surgery at Guy's Hospital , london said there

  1. Evaluate the Ethical Arguments For and Against Voluntary Euthanasia

    This can be determined when there is an absence of eye-opening, an absence of verbal and motor response to pain and the loss of brainstem reflexes. If there is evidence that the damage done to the brain is irreversible, then the person is brain dead.

  2. Euthanasia- coursework on Christian belief, ethical philosophers and that of the medical establishment.

    People who are in severe pain with a terminally ill disease, or whose quality of life is non-existent should be allowed the right to seek assistance if necessary. * Sometimes a terminal illness is so painful that it causes life to be an unbearable burden; death can represent a relief of intolerable pain.

  1. 'Acceptance of the practice of voluntary Euthanasia is incompatible with the Christian belief in ...

    they have the ability to reason things and they were created good. Christians also believe that God values human life greatly as Jesus came to die to heal the broken relationship between god and humans. Therefore belief in the importance of preserving life is a key issue in the sanctity of life argument.

  2. The Language of Euthanasia

    This new inaccurate definition results in the talk show host altering his original belief of the concept. Had the host been adequately educated he would have stood his ground and not altered his beliefs. This proves the point that there is a lack of consistency in the use of the term Euthanasia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work