• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Show how the theodicies of Irenaeus and Augustine account for natural evil.

Extracts from this document...


Romi Verstappen (a) Show how the theodicies of Irenaeus and Augustine account for natural evil. The problem of evil concerns the challenge of how an all-powerful and all-loving God can allow his creation to suffer, without helping then and putting an end to their suffering. This challenge is an often quoted reason for being unable to believe in God for it is argued, either God does not exist or, if he does then he is not a God worthy of out worship. St Augustine (AD354-430) tried to solve this problem and based his arguments on the Bible, especially the stories of the creation and the fall in Genesis. For Augustine, God is the source of everything, which he believed had been created out of nothing - 'ex nihilo'. As a result everything in the world is created good and therefore the world is perfect and free from faults. As far as Augustine was concerned all creation is good and it expresses the perfection of God's creativity and goodness, 'God saw all that he had made, and it was very good'. This implies that suffering and evil were unknown within this world. He argued that as God is perfect he could not be blamed for the fact that evil does exist within the world, and that any evil that is found is purely deprivation, not a substance - evil and unhappiness is the cause of lack of good and happiness. ...read more.


In our lives we have choices and it is through these life choices that we develop into 'good' creatures and into the 'likeness' of God. In order for us to develop morally toward God we had to be created and exist at a distance from him, therefore there had to be evil in the world. Natural evil (for example famine) had a divine purpose which was for us to develop qualities such as compassion. Therefore unlike Augustine, Irenaeus believes that God is partly responsible for evil. Irenaeus saw evil as a necessary part of life, something that will eventually make us into better people. Irenaeus sees the world as being unfinished and that we are moving towards a perfect world without evil but we have not reached it yet. God's purpose was not to create a paradise where the world was free of pain and suffering, but as a place where we can develop our souls and where we can become children of God'. God wants us to develop through our free will to become 'children'. The only way we can achieve this, we must be epistemically distanced from God in order to give us the perfect environment to develop both spiritually and morally into 'good' individuals. ...read more.


Another is that in this world we must live in a way that improves our soul and allows us to get in to heaven, so to act in a good way, evil has to exist. A third response is that God is the most highly intelligent and knowledgeable being in the universe so he may have reasons that the human mind cannot comprehend. A fourth response is that suffering is a punishment from God, suffering is a use for God to test us and that suffering stops people from straying away from their belief in God. The 18th century philosopher David Hume used the idea of a triangle, on which to base his argument. One side says, 'God is all powerful', the other says 'God is all powerful' and the third side says 'evil does not exist'. Hume stated that only 2 of the 3 can exist, and the existence of evil and suffering cannot be denied. Therefore one of the other statements about God is not true. Either God is all-powerful, but does not care for the world, or God loves the world, yet is not powerful enough to do anything about the evil and suffering. Either way it is looked at this means that the religious believer is lead to have doubts about God. They may question whether God is actually as powerful or as loving as is said. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. What is the problem of evil?

    The freewill defence also poses a logical difficulty as in a perfect world there would be no knowledge of good and evil as there was no such thing as evil. This presents the problem of how could there be freedom to obey and disobey God since good and evil would be unknown.

  2. What do religious believers mean by the 'problem of suffering?' Select any two ...

    By this, Augustine meant that we are all genetically descended from Adam but a modern interpretation would be that we all share a common human nature and would have done the same as Adam or Eve if in the garden of Eden for eternity.

  1. The problem of evil.

    Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Whence then evil?" In my opinion the design argument serves to present more problems for the religious believer, as one can't infer an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent being from a universe which contains instances of bad design, evil and innocent beings suffering, which in turn disputes the validity of the design argument.

  2. Good and Evil

    Looking at the life of Jesus we can see that Jesus spent his life doing good and helping people, Christians would simply look at Jesus' life and do as he as done. When Jesus gave his life for everyone as he died on the cross, Christians believe that here, Jesus

  1. Select two theodicies. Comment on their success or otherwise. (13)

    Through his grace however, God sent his son to die on the cross so that some might be saved and go to heaven. This demonstrates that God is merciful as well as just. The Irenaean theodicy admits that God is partly responsible for evil.

  2. Explain how the theodicy of Irenaeus differs from that of Augustine.

    God is a perfect and omnibenevolent being and Augustine stated that evil could not logically stem from something perfect. Augustine believed that Adam and Eve were created faultless and were the first human beings given free choice. When they subsequently abused this choice, the idea that the whole human

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    suggest there was already knowledge of evil, which could only have come from God. Augustine's reliance on the creation and fall stories poses many problems. One problem is that the world was made perfect by God and then ruined by humans as this goes against the evolutionary theory, which asserts

  2. Discuss the Problem of Evil

    of knowing if stopping one evil happening will cause a much greater evil to happen in the future.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work