• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Conflict between Religion and Science

Extracts from this document...


The Conflict between Religion and Science Widely speaking we regard science as the matter of reason; religion is a matter of faith. In science things can be proved. In religion we have to take things on authority. Keith Ward * Three Stages of religious thought and understanding. 1. Tribal religion, imaginary cosmologies, rituals. 2. The founding of the great scriptural (written) traditions - Holy texts which began to claim final and universal truth. 3. Developments since the 17th and 18th century, a new way of understanding God and the world. (Birth of modern science). Since the 17th and the 18th century the Christian faith in the world west has been transformed by three great movements of thought. 1. The rise of the natural sciences as epitomised by Galileo and his conflict with the Roman Catholic Church. Everyone knows that Galileo won the argument and the church was no longer contempt to disagree with all experimental science. ...read more.


Science deals with physics, religion with metaphysics. Therefore following this view both sides should be able to co-inside with each other and give their own contribution to us. Two big areas, in which religion and science are at conflict, are questions to do with the start of the universe and the start of life. * St Thomas Aquinas- * Put forward- that the notion of infinite time or eternal matter was argued as intellectually absurd without the notion of a metaphysically necessary being to provide an ontological start. * This has found renewed support from many other modern philosophers. * The Big Bang Theory- developed by Edwin Hubble. * This supposed that billions of years ago an explosion of cosmic gases came from a single point of singularity and of great density. * This therefore started of the process for the world with which we see today, through evolution. * Scientists are happy to accept, this makes it hard for the philosophers to reject this but still have faith in the belief that God created the universe. ...read more.


* In the heart of all the differences comes Miracles * David Hume described a miracle as being a "transgression of the law of nature by a particular volition of the deity." * Hume criticised the miracles on 'empirical probabilities'. Religion claims that reality goes beyond the empirical and the verifiable, while science is still able to deny this. Many believers still believe that the findings of science are compatible with their beliefs. * Albert Einstein viewed the conflict of one that needs both science and religion to be able to show a total picture of reality. * This though is denied by scientists who believe that they can prove religion wrong no matter what they say. Real conflict between religion and science will continue to revolve around beliefs about what constitutes reality. As long as science insists on its belief that reality is only what can be investigated by scientific methods, religion will represent a rival belief that reality has a wider reach. From this perspective there can only be logically no agreement between science and religion than between religion and atheism. David Morrey ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Assess Nietzsche's critique of religion.

    For example, it avoids the will to escape and reinforces people's authority which is ideal for masters. It is a means for overcoming resistance for the masters. It provides lessons in self-disciplining and self-mastering for the masters which are indispensable for those who want to become masters or who are

  2. Bertrand Russell and Atheism.

    we see around us, the universe, or why there is something rather than nothing. But postulating God explains nothing, because if God exists then God requires an explanation - and a good one. The "teleological" argument claims that (1) aspects of the world exhibit purposeful design, and (2)

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    However, I believe this objection is untenable. For one thing, if the causal principle (P1) is taken as an empirical generalization it is false, since quantum mechanics has show n that many particles (virtual particles) begin to exist without being caused to do so.

  2. Is it possible for religion and science to co - exist?

    While the universe appears to be subject to random chance, it is still a part of a game whose rules were formulated by God. Everything in the universe is subject to Gods will, not jus at the point of Creation, but throughout history.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Darwin produced an alternative explanation for the design of God, without reference to creation by God. Darwin argued that random variations gave the particular plant or animal an advantage lead to the 'survival of the fittest' of that specie. This meant that God was no longer required to explain how the natural world has developed.

  2. Science And Religion.

    then after long periods of time evolved to create the species that we see around us, including ourselves.

  1. In what ways may modern ideas about evolution conflict with the biblical concept of ...

    The bible also says that man was created as a special being - in the image of God and completely opposes the view that man could just be another being in the process of the ongoing evolution. If evolution were a completely correct theory then creation would be totally disproved

  2. Does science lead to atheism?

    Personally, I feel that challenging such religious dogmas and doctrines may seem troublesome at first, but would contribute in development of a more rational and logical personality, ultimately paving the way towards a better and more open-minded society. Even if science does not present a direct evidence of God, it does not mean that it supports atheism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work