• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Design Argument fails because of its weaknesses" Examine and comment on this claim

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Design Argument fails because of its weaknesses" Examine and comment on this claim The Design Argument does fail due to its weaknesses, it is lacking in factual and substantial evidence to prove its theories. It puts forward a lot of ideas and claims however they are not justified well enough; the only true fact is that you have to believe them. I feel it is correct to claim that it fails due to the amount of criticising evidence against the theories for the existence of God. The main philosopher to criticise and object to the Teleogical Argument was David Hume. He looked at every point towards the existence towards a creator and designer and then thought logically about the condemnation and came up with rebuttals. He realised that most of the arguments put forward just relied on the reader to use their faith and belief to consider it and assume it was correct with no real evidence, just connections and assumptions. The first objection he made was about the theory where Paley uses his analogy about a watch. Hume clearly uses his logic here by describing his own example of a human hair. ...read more.

Middle

Hume then evaluates the fire and smoke theory from Paley and once again finds another weakness, which is a theory based upon assumption and prediction. Paley says that we know that fire causes smoke therefore every time we see smoke we know it is from a fire. He then links it to say that a designer has created the world because things have been designed. However if we have never seen the world created by a designer then how do we know it was? Yes, the fire and smoke part is true because we have actually witnessed smoke caused by fire and we know from science and evidence that smoke is always caused by fire. Yet if no one has seen the world created of even the creator himself, then how can we say that he created it? Furthermore we do not know that everything was designed either, just because things seem to look designed does not mean they are? If trees were upside down from the beginning and then we come to this point in time, it would be probable that the theories would still be the same and many Philosophers would have declared that everything has been designed. ...read more.

Conclusion

Earth. However Hume contradicts this by saying that this does not necessarily mean that it was designed. Paley keeps trying to say that everything was designed even though the problem of evil clearly overpowers his hypothesis. Hume adds to this by saying that why can't the Earth have been like this naturally? Stuart Mill also agrees with this, saying that if there is evidence of a designer which would consequently prove the case for a superior being, it would then mean the designer could not have been all powerful and loving as people suffer hence this contradicts other theories about God being all loving and caring. Dawkins also rejects any design in the world and variations and he gives the reasoning down to DNA mistakes, which is considered a mutation, and DNA mistakes occurs quite a lot. In conclusion I believe that the Design Argument fails due to the substantial evidence against it. I do not think that the proof for the existence of God can overcome this due to the fact that there are no conclusive facts. It is incorrect to say that the Design Argument proves the existence of God because it is not accurate and just based upon bias theories and assumptions. ?? ?? ?? ?? Nick Gibson Philosophy Miss Newton Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    Things such as being able to explain order in other ways than God, and anthropomorphism do hold the design argument back from being successful.

  2. Good and Evil

    She then trained as a nurse and set up a hospital for the sick and deprived. She found it important to then help the education less children, so she began to teach them the teachings of Jesus. Being very religiously aware Mother Theresa new that you needed courage and unselfishness

  1. Essay on Waiting for Godot.

    The blind have no notion of time. The things of time are hidden from them too" (Beckett, 55). Pozzo's situation symbolizes the effects of time on humans. The inherent meaninglessness of a world based on chance degenerates human life into something that is worthless and can be toyed with by Fortune.

  2. Examine the design argument for the existence of God.

    It is probable that there was a God - this is because of the order and complexity of the universe. However, probability does not serve as substantial evidence for a God. The universe could in fact be the result of a committee of Gods, if you will: the comparison of

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Since happiness should be the natural reward of virtue. However this rarely happens in our world, so he concluded that there must be something else which motivates us to behave morally accept for he rewards of immediate happiness. He concluded that people must have an objective sense of morality, which

  2. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    This illustrates the influence and importance of the empirical theory of empiricism, which states that all knowledge is based upon, or comes from, experience and rejects irrationality and superstition. The main problem with this theory is that you have to take into account is that of themselves theoretical and not empirically based e.g.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    He then tries to prove that this supposition leads to a conclusion, which cannot possibly be true.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    It is a mark of incompetent planning or poor design to create as the first natural state something that requires supernatural intervention 'right off the bat' to ensure that it leads to the desired outcome. The rational and efficient thing to do is to create some state that by its own lawful nature evolves into a life-containing universe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work