• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Design Argument fails because of its weaknesses" Examine and comment on this claim

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Design Argument fails because of its weaknesses" Examine and comment on this claim The Design Argument does fail due to its weaknesses, it is lacking in factual and substantial evidence to prove its theories. It puts forward a lot of ideas and claims however they are not justified well enough; the only true fact is that you have to believe them. I feel it is correct to claim that it fails due to the amount of criticising evidence against the theories for the existence of God. The main philosopher to criticise and object to the Teleogical Argument was David Hume. He looked at every point towards the existence towards a creator and designer and then thought logically about the condemnation and came up with rebuttals. He realised that most of the arguments put forward just relied on the reader to use their faith and belief to consider it and assume it was correct with no real evidence, just connections and assumptions. The first objection he made was about the theory where Paley uses his analogy about a watch. Hume clearly uses his logic here by describing his own example of a human hair. ...read more.

Middle

Hume then evaluates the fire and smoke theory from Paley and once again finds another weakness, which is a theory based upon assumption and prediction. Paley says that we know that fire causes smoke therefore every time we see smoke we know it is from a fire. He then links it to say that a designer has created the world because things have been designed. However if we have never seen the world created by a designer then how do we know it was? Yes, the fire and smoke part is true because we have actually witnessed smoke caused by fire and we know from science and evidence that smoke is always caused by fire. Yet if no one has seen the world created of even the creator himself, then how can we say that he created it? Furthermore we do not know that everything was designed either, just because things seem to look designed does not mean they are? If trees were upside down from the beginning and then we come to this point in time, it would be probable that the theories would still be the same and many Philosophers would have declared that everything has been designed. ...read more.

Conclusion

Earth. However Hume contradicts this by saying that this does not necessarily mean that it was designed. Paley keeps trying to say that everything was designed even though the problem of evil clearly overpowers his hypothesis. Hume adds to this by saying that why can't the Earth have been like this naturally? Stuart Mill also agrees with this, saying that if there is evidence of a designer which would consequently prove the case for a superior being, it would then mean the designer could not have been all powerful and loving as people suffer hence this contradicts other theories about God being all loving and caring. Dawkins also rejects any design in the world and variations and he gives the reasoning down to DNA mistakes, which is considered a mutation, and DNA mistakes occurs quite a lot. In conclusion I believe that the Design Argument fails due to the substantial evidence against it. I do not think that the proof for the existence of God can overcome this due to the fact that there are no conclusive facts. It is incorrect to say that the Design Argument proves the existence of God because it is not accurate and just based upon bias theories and assumptions. ?? ?? ?? ?? Nick Gibson Philosophy Miss Newton Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    time and space. Habel defines religious experience 'as the structured way in which a believer enters into a relationship with, or gains awareness of, the sacred within the context of a particular religious tradition' (Habel, O'Donoghue and Maddox : 1993).

  2. Good and Evil

    Influenced by, and having faith in God and Jesus, Mother Theresa led her life believing this; "Let the poor use you, be kind and merciful". One particular Christian who is famous for his work for others was Dr Martin Luther King.

  1. Examine the design argument for the existence of God.

    and therefore the evidence provided is obvious to humankind - as we can witness it and understand it and deduce things from it. This is a strong point, I think, as we know that the world does exist and we know that our world is complex.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Darwin produced an alternative explanation for the design of God, without reference to creation by God. Darwin argued that random variations gave the particular plant or animal an advantage lead to the 'survival of the fittest' of that specie. This meant that God was no longer required to explain how the natural world has developed.

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    be any a priori truth that rules out the big bang singularity, but there is a probabilistic argument that supports the view that the universe began with a divinely created big bang explosion rather than with a God-incompatible singularity. The hypothesis of divine creation is simpler and for this reason is more likely to be true than the atheistic hypothesis.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    God exists or doesn't exist 3. Assume God doesn't exist 4. If God does not exist then the Greatest concievable being does not exist 5. You can conceive of existence Greatest concievable being 6. But an exiting Greatest concievable being is greater than a non-existing Greatest concievable being 7.

  1. The Design Argument for the existence of God.

    result of intelligent design, the universe must have been brought into existence by an intelligent designer, God. Paley pointed to astronomy and Newton's laws of motion as evidence of design qua regularity. The way planets rotate within the solar system, obeying the same universal laws holding their orbits because of gravity, could not have occurred by chance.

  2. Present the strengths and weaknesses of Augustine's and Ireneaus' theodicy

    Loss of order in the world, caused by 'Moral Chaos', lead to 'Natural Evil'. It was like a domino effect, evil after evil after evil happened. First it started off from being made by humans and angels, now evil had become almost a natural thing to happen.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work