• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Design Argument fails because of its weaknesses" Examine and comment on this claim

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Design Argument fails because of its weaknesses" Examine and comment on this claim The Design Argument does fail due to its weaknesses, it is lacking in factual and substantial evidence to prove its theories. It puts forward a lot of ideas and claims however they are not justified well enough; the only true fact is that you have to believe them. I feel it is correct to claim that it fails due to the amount of criticising evidence against the theories for the existence of God. The main philosopher to criticise and object to the Teleogical Argument was David Hume. He looked at every point towards the existence towards a creator and designer and then thought logically about the condemnation and came up with rebuttals. He realised that most of the arguments put forward just relied on the reader to use their faith and belief to consider it and assume it was correct with no real evidence, just connections and assumptions. The first objection he made was about the theory where Paley uses his analogy about a watch. Hume clearly uses his logic here by describing his own example of a human hair. ...read more.

Middle

Hume then evaluates the fire and smoke theory from Paley and once again finds another weakness, which is a theory based upon assumption and prediction. Paley says that we know that fire causes smoke therefore every time we see smoke we know it is from a fire. He then links it to say that a designer has created the world because things have been designed. However if we have never seen the world created by a designer then how do we know it was? Yes, the fire and smoke part is true because we have actually witnessed smoke caused by fire and we know from science and evidence that smoke is always caused by fire. Yet if no one has seen the world created of even the creator himself, then how can we say that he created it? Furthermore we do not know that everything was designed either, just because things seem to look designed does not mean they are? If trees were upside down from the beginning and then we come to this point in time, it would be probable that the theories would still be the same and many Philosophers would have declared that everything has been designed. ...read more.

Conclusion

Earth. However Hume contradicts this by saying that this does not necessarily mean that it was designed. Paley keeps trying to say that everything was designed even though the problem of evil clearly overpowers his hypothesis. Hume adds to this by saying that why can't the Earth have been like this naturally? Stuart Mill also agrees with this, saying that if there is evidence of a designer which would consequently prove the case for a superior being, it would then mean the designer could not have been all powerful and loving as people suffer hence this contradicts other theories about God being all loving and caring. Dawkins also rejects any design in the world and variations and he gives the reasoning down to DNA mistakes, which is considered a mutation, and DNA mistakes occurs quite a lot. In conclusion I believe that the Design Argument fails due to the substantial evidence against it. I do not think that the proof for the existence of God can overcome this due to the fact that there are no conclusive facts. It is incorrect to say that the Design Argument proves the existence of God because it is not accurate and just based upon bias theories and assumptions. ?? ?? ?? ?? Nick Gibson Philosophy Miss Newton Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    Therefore existence is not like a real predicate (characteristic/quality) but is just a concept in the mind but actually exist in reality. The anology of the car attempts to try and simply Kant's objections to the ontological argument. 'What would be an ideal car?' For most civilians a 'perfect car' would probably include power steering, air conditioning, electric windows etc.

  2. Essay on Waiting for Godot.

    All of this is an attempt to remain oblivious of the fact that they are waiting for a vague figure, partly of their own invention, that will never come. They do not want to realize that their lives are meaningless.

  1. Examine the design argument for the existence of God.

    We cannot make assumptions using our knowledge, as we have no knowledge of anything before our existence. David Hume17 specifically emerged as a major opponent of the design argument, and found several flaws with Paley's version. Hume argued that: * We do not have sufficient knowledge of the creation of

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    compels people to act in a certain way, regardless of the consequences. Kant argued that there are certain, rationally discoverable laws called the categorical imperative. Kant moved on to wonder if any conclusion could be drawn about whether morality is a matter of applying rational thought to discover categorical imperatives.

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    However, this was not Tennant's only argument. He also was responsible for developing the Aesthetic argument. This is a simple but very valid argument. He argued that humans have the ability to appreciate nature, music, food, and other things that trigger emotions.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    The Question of Divine Intervention One objection to the argument of section 3 is that it does not take into account the possibility of divine intervention. If the big bang singularity is lawless, then it is feasible for God to intervene at the instant of the singularity and supernaturally

  1. Religious experiences present a convincing argument for the existence of God. Analyse this claim? ...

    The objectivist view supposes that there is some object or actual entity- such as god- which exists independently of the experience, interaction which causes the experience itself. God is described as numinous. This is a term often used to describe the experience in which God's separateness is highlighted.

  2. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    This illustrates the influence and importance of the empirical theory of empiricism, which states that all knowledge is based upon, or comes from, experience and rejects irrationality and superstition. The main problem with this theory is that you have to take into account is that of themselves theoretical and not empirically based e.g.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work