• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The design argument for the existence of God (also called the teleological argument).

Extracts from this document...


Mark Smith The design argument The design argument for the existence of God (also called the teleological argument). The design argument is an aposteriori argument. It is based on observation of the apparent order the universe and the natural world, to conclude that it is not the result of mere chance, but of design. The evidence from design points to a designer and the argument concludes that this designer is God. 'With such signs of forethought in the design of living creatures, can you doubt they are the work of choice or design?' (Socrates) The classical argument for design states that: the universe has order, purpose and regularity, the complexity of the universe shows evidence of design, such design implies a designer, the designer of the universe is God. The argument makes the basic assumption that there is order and design in the universe, and that all things function to fulfil a specific purpose. For example, the changing seasons, the lifestyles of animals and birds, the intricate organism of the human body and the perfect adaptation of its parts to the whole appear to provide evidence that the universe was designed. The design argument is in two parts, design qua regularity and design qua purpose. Design qua regularity looks at design in relation to the order and regularity in the universe. Philosophers who support the argument consider that the order and regularity evident in the universe is evidence of a designer at work. ...read more.


All these various machines, and ever' their most minute parts, are adjusted to each other with an accuracy which ravishes into admiration all men who have ever contemplated them. The curious adapting of means to ends, throughout all nature, resembles exactly, though it much exceeds, the productions of human contrivance - of human design. Thought, wisdom and intelligence. Since therefore the effects resemble each other, we are led to infer, by all the rules of analogy, that the causes also resemble, and that the Author of nature is somewhat similar to the mind of man, though possessed of much larger faculties, proportioned to the grandeur of the work which he has executed. By this argument aposteriori, and by this argument alone, do we prove at once the existence of a Deity and his similarity to human mind and intelligence. The central claim of the argument from design is that our studies of nature reveal an orderliness and a pattern in the features of the physical, chemical and biological aspects of the world. The more that nature is studied, the more impressed one becomes with the intricate relation ships within its pans, and with the general plan of the universe. The order and design of nature resembles greatly the order and design of human artefacts, such as houses and watches, in which each part is perfectly adjusted to each other in order to achieve some purpose or end of the whole object. ...read more.


Paley's argument is made with passionate sincerity and is informed by the best biological scholarship of his day, but it is wrong, gloriously and utterly wrong. The analogy between telescope and eye, - between watch and living organism, is false. All appearances to the contrary, the only watchmaker in nature is the blind forces of physics albeit deployed in a very special way. A. true watchmaker has foresight: he designs his cogs and springs, and plans their interconnections, with a future purpose, in his mind's eye. Natural selection, the blind, unconscious, automatic process which Darwin discovered, and which we now know- is the explanation for the existence and apparently purpose ful form of all life, has no purpose in mind. It has no mind and no mind's eye. It does not plan for the future. It has no vision, no foresight, no sight at all. If it can be said to play the role of watchmaker in nature, it is the blind watchmaker.' All the arguments for and against design have valid points but none are fully successful in proving anything because each argument can be criticised where it has flaws. Therefore design in the universe comes down to probability and so it can be thought that the universe it just as probable to have been designed then it has not. However it can be argued that it was more probable that the universe was designed and that there was a designer. On the other hand there is no proof that the designer was God. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    a cause, this doesn't mean the universe itself must also have a cause: 'because everything in it has a cause is like claiming that because every human being has a mother, the entire human race has a mother. 'The whole concept of cause is one we derive from our observation

  2. 'An analysis of arguments for the existence of God will result in valid philosophical ...

    Given this situation, it is reasonable to rely on reports of religious experience to tip the scales in favour of belief that God exists. However, I do not find this a convincing piece of reasoning because the existence of God is nothing to do with probability, and it is misleading to make it so.

  1. How successful is the teleological argument in proving the existence of God?

    This would be a watchmaker. Likewise this can be applied to humans, since nature has the similarity of order and design we too must have been designed. In spite of the fact that a human being is more complex than a watch, a designer is required in order to allow all our organs and elements to work in sink.

  2. Discuss the teleological argument for the existence of God. How viable is this argument?

    a clock which chimes every hour)." Purpose Design would be an object that has been created for a particular purpose or action; this is evident in the work of William Paley (1743-1805). He wrote in his book 'Natural Theology: Or Evidences of the Existence and attributes of the Deity Collected from the Appearances of Nature' (1802)

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    if the parts had been differently shaped, or positioned differently, or placed in any other manner than that which they are placed, either no motion at all would've been carried on in the machine, or none which would have answered the use now served by it."

  2. "If God made the world, then he must be absent without leave!" Write an ...

    Near the end of what doctors called his 'life,' he claims to have received a vision, which he believes was sent by God. In this vision, he said that he saw two tunnels of light. He chose a tunnel, and was brought back to life again.

  1. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    that seems to lead to a contradiction or to a situation that defies intuition' and is resolved when it is shown that the contradiction is only apparent. Kierkegaard uses the story of Abraham in fear and trembling as an example of this and says that Abraham couldn't prove that he

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    The evidence from design points to a designer, which the argument concludes, is God. Design qua regularity looks at design in relation to order and regularity of the universe, which suggests a designer at work. Just as a garden suggests a gardener because of the order i.e.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work