• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Design Argument For The Existence Of God

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Design Argument For The Existence Of God This argument is also called the teleological argument, it argues that the universe did not come around by mere chance, but some one or something designed it. This thing was God. This argument is a prosteriori because the observation of the natural world is taken into the mind to conclude that there is a designer. The belief that the universe was designed by God was triggered by things like the four seasons; summer, spring, autumn and winter, that change through the year. The adaption of the human body and the structure of earths natural things. All of this had to of been designed to make the universe come into order, have a purpose and regularity. Because the world is so complexed and in order, God is believed to have so much power and is omnipotent to have designed the universe. Such natural things such as trees, grass and flowers are each individual. Everything is a part of everything else, Einstein thought that everything is connected to have a specific purpose on earth. If everything was all muddled up then they wouldn't work properly. For example; a car would not drive if the engine and other parts of the car were not fitted right. ...read more.

Middle

This being must have been God. The argument against the design argument for God is 'Evolution'. Evolution is the process from where human life and other creations have evolved from the earliest and most primitive organisms to evolve to what they are now. Charles Darwin challenged the design argument with revolutionised thoughts that species, including human beings have developed to become what they are now. Darwin did not refer to God in this argument. The way that the evolution was described was as if humans had come from a long chain of different species, this species was believed to have been apes. This ape was had to have evolved from a species of mammal; the mammal had evolved from a descended reptile, which the reptile in the past had been a fish and the fish would have been the origin of all life forms and a simple bacterium. It was also trying to be proven that humans have evolved from apes because apes and humans have to same tail bone in the bottom of their back. 'The survival of the fittest' was also another way that Herbert Spencer and Charles Darwin explained part of the evolutionary process. This meant that the strongest or healthiest life form was the one that had the advantage of living on in the world. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example; the DNA from a reptile and the DNA from a mammal together may form a new kind of species. I believe that the world could have developed from both the teleological argument and evolution. The designer of the universe could have been God, however, the creation of life on the universe could have been up to the facts of evolution. 'Darwinism and the Anthropic Principle' believed that 'Nature produces living beings but with fine tuning that is found in the universe; life could just as easily not developed into earth' I think that this quote is trying to say that the universe has been developed by evolution and was created by God, a designer. But if God had not created the universe for beings to be evolved onto then evolution may not have been possible. If the world is compared to a machine, then some one had to make that machine for other people control it. This is my other point to say that God created the universe but evolution had developed the universe into what it is now. So, to conclude I think that evolution and the teleological argument are both at fault for the designing of the universe, taking over from each other to form human beings and the solar system. By Emma Milligan ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. 'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

    Darwin believed that what Paley had attributed to design was in fact random chance: "We can no longer argue that, for instance, the beautiful hinge of a brivale shell must have been made by an intelligent being, like the hinge of a door by a man.

  2. Discuss the teleological argument for the existence of God. How viable is this argument?

    The universe can easily be regarded as a living organism such as a plant, which case the argument from design fails since the teleological argument depends on the comparison to an artefact. (7) Order in the universe might easily be the result of chance.

  1. Evolution - Charles Darwin and Christian belief

    adaptations, and evolution by descent were true, then the argument from design was dead and all that went with it, namely 1) the existence of a personal God, 2)free will, 3)Life after death, 4)immutable moral laws, and 5)ultimate meaning of life."

  2. What are the key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    John Stuart Mill builds upon the idea of the imperfections of the world and the existence of evil. In his book "Three essays of Religion" he argues that "the apparent imperfections in the Universe and the amount of natural evils that occur, the most plausible hypothesis were either to deny the designer's goodness or to deny the designer's omnipotence."

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    (Paley, Natural Theology, 1802) Here he is explaining that if gravity was even slightly stronger, or opposing forces weaker, then there would be chaos as everything collides. This strongly suggests an element of design in the world. Arthur Brown was a more recent supporter of the design argument.

  2. Examine the design argument for the existence of God.

    has no complexity, does not change, is not in constant motion, and seems to have no purpose; therefore, it is acceptable to presume that the stone had existed forever. The second part of the argument for the existence of God is design qua regularity - Paley used evidence from astronomy

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Even if the design argument was valid it would only merely prove the existence of a designer, this may not necessarily be the God of Classical Theism, and the design could just have easily been the result of several gods or an apprentice God.

  2. The Teleological Argument.

    The victim tries to explain way this happen and the only possibility he thought was that the machine must have been rigged. The kidnapper casts doubt on this suggestion saying, 'It is hardly surprising that the machine draws only aces of hearts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work