• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The greatest happiness for the greatest number" Using ToK thinking and terms, how far is the good basis for an ethical system?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Name: Jonathan Tam Class: 13A International Baccalaureate - Theory of Knowledge Yew Chung International School "The greatest happiness for the greatest number" Using ToK thinking and terms, how far is the good basis for an ethical system? This statement mainly tackles with the problems arise by ethics. Theory of Knowledge tells us to investigate a problem in four ways: logic, perception, emotion and language. Language could be one of the most important areas of debate. First of all, how to we define "happiness"? Do we talk about instantaneous happiness, or long term happiness? An instantaneous happiness might lead to a long term regret, so will this still be considered as "happiness"? If long term sadness outweighs instantaneous happiness, how do we place such happiness in terms of importance? We usually define happiness as "the possession of those circumstances or that state of being which is attended enjoyment"1 and it has no time limit. So in both cases we can still define it as happiness. Perception, in this case, is nothing more than the means for us to sense pleasure thus determine our source of happiness. ...read more.

Middle

We are able to evaluate the benefits and consequences of committing a particular action2 thus able to commit an action that we believe is best for us. All the above only relates to how an individual determines happiness. If we are to deal with the "greatest number" part of the statement, then we will have to refer to some other philosophers. Some philosophers believe that, the ends justify the means. For example, if we can get from Point A to Point B, it does not matter which route we took, as long as we arrive at that place safely. This is what utilitarianism believed. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory, first developed by Jeremy Bentham, which is only interested in the ends and not the manner in which those ends are achieved. The way utilitarianism determines between a right and wrong action is by seeing which promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number, and this is known as the Principle of Utility3. However, even the greatest number is satisfied does not mean that it is ethically justified and makes it a moral action. The problem with Bentham's utilitarianism is the idea that the manner in which the ends are achieved is not important. ...read more.

Conclusion

Since the 100 units of happiness of Leanne are irrelevant to egoists, they will prefer the teacher to give all chocolates to themselves (in this case even Jonathan will want all the chocolate because all the other units of happiness is irrelevant). However if they are all altruists or utilitarianists then they will agree to give the chocolates all to Leanne because this will satisfy others (altruists) and get the greatest units of happiness (utilitarianists). In the above examples, we see that it is very hard to judge whether an action is morally justified. It is even harder to determine if the greatest number is satisfied (due to the fact that there are three kinds of philosophical thinking and each will give a different result). There is no one correct answer to whether the above statement is ethical or moral. More importantly is that there are other sources which gives us happiness but cannot be quantified (e.g. love, care or other forms of emotions). This is why people need other criteria to help judging, for example science or religion, as these sources have other evidence (scientific formulae and the Bible). Word Count: 1472 1 From Dictionary.com "happiness" 2 For some of us we are physically mature but mentally native, right? 3 http://www.la.utexas.edu/research/poltheory/bentham/ipml/ipml.c01.n01.html 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    Plato would see justice as simply a product of the Good which is the main area of his study, where it therefore follows that ethics itself is related almost directly to the Good. Plato suggests that the form of the Good is what allows us to know things; it gives us the faculty to understand the intelligible world.

  2. Utilitarianism is a good ethical theory. Why and why not?

    And how certain can you be that your perception of how happy it will make other people is not simply a personal opinion. It was indeed Hitler's personal opinion that the only solution to the "problem" of the Jews was to brutally murder them, to benefit the Aryan "master" race.

  1. Should our moral beliefs be based on the utilitarian principle of securing the greatest ...

    Many people often use this moral principle in making daily decisions. When people are asked to explain why they feel that they have a moral duty to make a decision, or perform some action, it is often been answered as they pointed out that there will be benefit come out from it, or the harm can be prevented.

  2. Explain what Scholars means when they say ethical statements are no more than expressions ...

    This has, without a doubt, justified the principles of which the Emotive theory is based upon, as it has raised fundamental questions with regards of normative systems of morality. However, intuitionist critics such as Moore, oppose to Emotivist views on ethical statements, as he believes that statements can be verified through intuition.

  1. How can you or your society decide ethically which knowledge should or should not ...

    You know what is right and wrong to you, and as a normal human being, you think of your own survival and what is best for you. But as a society, there are too many barriers to an ethical agreement.

  2. Euthanasia can never be justified

    Seeing a loved one's suffering can be very hard on family and friends and the patients themselves sometimes feel the pain is too much to bear. They may request to end their own and their loved ones' misery by ending their lives with dignity and no pain.

  1. Different religious and philosophical views on controversial topics.

    it causes pleasure to those who give and also to those who receive. They would also say that since not giving doesn't cause any pain or pleasure, that not giving to charity is simply a neutral act and as such just giving at events such as comic relief is ok

  2. "Miller's plays show is that happiness can only be achieved by making moral compromises" ...

    to think that when I got money...I would have a maid and my wife would take it easy" therefore Joe (and hence Miller) is showing that in order to be happy, it is necessary to have money which can only be earned by keeping the business running at all costs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work