• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Irenaean theodicy - Questioning God.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. (a) Outline & Justify the Irenaean theodicy (b) Outline & Justify Hicks vale of soul making 2. In your opinion does the "Irenaean type" of theodicy provide less stumbling for the religious believer than the free will believers? 1. (a) The Irenaean theodicy, begins with a clear distinction between the image of God and the likeness of God in man: * The image of God in man represents our ontological link with God as our creator who created us intelligent and capable of worship. * The likeness represents man's final perfecting by the Holy Spirit. The key point here is that Irenarus sees humans as being divinely created (ontology) with the ability to make moral choice and live free lives. But, humankind is "Only at the beginning of a process whereby we will grow and develop within our finite context. Thus we are only potentially the perfected being who God is seeking to produce." Also God has complete moral knowledge and we (humans) are too immature to believe it: "God has power at the beginning to grant perfection to man; but as the latter was only recently created, he could not possibly have received it, or even if he could have received it, could he have contained it, or containing it, could he have retained it." ...read more.

Middle

The second stage is of a different kind. It cannot be performed by omnipotent power as such, as personal life is essentially free and self-directing. It cannot be perfected by divine fiat, but only through the uncompelled responses and willing co-operation of human individuals in their actions and reactions in a world which God has placed them. An important point to raise here is that because the 2nd stage is driven by man we must have free will, so that we can get closer to God. And we "must" have free will, otherwise if God did it, it would be pointless. Hick uses a few key words which put forward his position: * Human Responsibility * Uncompelled responses / willing co-operation * Responsible choice * Freedom As the nature of the demands placed on human beings is such that they learn (Developmental), move towards the demands of their creator (Teleological / Goal) and then reach some unknown (or partially understood) reality beyond this life. Hick says that other theologians and philosophers of asking the wrong question about the nature and creation of the world. For example Hume's criticisms regarding the theistic creation of the world as examples of the imperfections which could suggest either God's ineptitude or non-participation in creation, or, moreover, his very non-existence, then evil would raise the same problems. ...read more.

Conclusion

This theodicy basically means that we start of immature and during our infinite life we mature and the sin goes. Ireneaus says that we need to have the option of good and evil, so we can become more mature and as a result we loose our sin. Sin accounts for us making the wrong decisions but Christ provided us with the knowledge to change our ways, so if we strive to be like Christ (mature) we shall loose our sin. "Evil can lead to good" The Irenaean theodicy I believe has more strengths than the Augustinian free will theodicy, the whole theodicy can be summed up into a simply. The Irenaean type of theodicy means by man develops morally and spiritually. Therefore God is not responsible for mans evil choices, therefore evil is teleological - it's purpose to facilitate growth. Both of these theodicys depend on the principle of free will - even if it that God created man in his perfect likeness, from which he fell through the inevitable use of his divinely given free will - or if man's moral development is evolutionary, that is, he has the capacity to grow into the likeness of God through the use of free will. I believe that Irenaeus' theodicy does show fewer stumbling blocks for a religious believer especially in the present day. R.S - Mr Maloney 29/10/01 David Shadbolt 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Good and Evil

    James declared that he who knows to do good, and yet who does it not, is guilty of sinful conduct (James. 4:17). So to the Bible sin is anything that causes the neglect of Gods true will; consent to the devils vocation.

  2. Evaluation of Augustine's Theodicy.

    Another objection to the Augustinian Theodicy is from Friedrich Schliermarcher. God created the first humans with free will, these humans were perfectly good. The world around the first humans was perfectly good, which begs the question as to why humans would fall from being perfectly good, into sin, thereby creating evil.

  1. Explain how natural evil may be seen as a challenge to belief in God ...

    he can easily stop it, and if he is all-loving and he cares for us why doesn't he stop it instead of putting us through all that trauma? This is a theological problem, as it challenges the nature of God.

  2. Explain how the theodicy of Irenaeus differs from that of Augustine.

    Both are, however, based on the concept of humanity having free will and moral autonomy. Despite this similarity, Irenaeus' theodicy is more sustainable under examination than Augustine's. In a modern world, Augustine's theodicy seems unrealistic. It is based on a fundamentalist view of Biblical creation myths and the story of The Fall.

  1. Arguments about god.

    of man (people). Part two: Difficulties in trying to describe God Traditional theological words associate unique features to God In Genesis it states that God created us in his own image, yet we cannot do half the things he can.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    To Kant, it seemed impossible that we could require an aim for an impossible goal. This deadlock led Kant to postulate the existence of God and immorality. As we are unable to achieve the goal in this lifetime there must be someone else to ensure that we can in a future life.

  1. Research on St Augustine Theodicy.

    this was not due to the temptation of Satan but because he already had a corrupted heart ('For when the will abandons what is above itself, and turns to what is lower, it becomes evil - not because that is evil to which it turns, but because the turning itself is wicked' (Hick quoting Augustine p.60)).

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    There exists an object on a two dimensional surface. (4A) Therefore, there exists a third spatial dimension. If (1A)-(4A) proves that objects on two dimensional surfaces require a third spatial dimension, then the following argument proves that there is a heaven: (1B)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work