• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The novel "Finding Grace", by Alyssa Brugman is the story of a brain damaged woman named Grace

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Expository Oral Anousha and Sabrena are seated on stage as a short clip is played on the projector screen, showing the introduction of a news broadcast. Sabrena: Good afternoon, I am Sabrena Lee. Anousha: And I am Anousha Gilroy. Together: And you are tuned into today's new broadcast. Anousha: Our main stories tonight: 'Finding Grace' and 'Whose Life is it Anyway' are both texts which mobilise the discourse of Disablement, however, they each construct two completely different views. Just how do they do it? We get down and dirty discussing the effects in which the attitudes, values and beliefs inherent and the discourses mobilised in the texts position the readers and viewers to side with a particular opinion over another. Sabrena: In addition, a live debate will be taking place about the controversial issue of euthanasia, or suicide, whichever way you look at it, and who has the right to make the decision concerning whether a person lives or dies. However, firstly, we will cross over to Sam French, who is currently at the National Library of Brisbane. (The tables are moved apart to signify a scene change) Anousha: This is an outrage! I am reporting live from the National Library of Brisbane where a serious felony has been committed. All copies of the novel, 'Finding Grace' have been stolen, (Holds up novel) except for this one. ...read more.

Middle

Throughout the play, the law is foregrounded as being excessive and inconsiderate to the feelings and conditions of the victims of disablement. The discourse of law values pro-life and opposes euthanasia. This creates a barrier between Ken and his choice of committing suicide. It is mobilised by the characters of Mr Hill, the judge and Dr Emerson, whose attitude is that there is no personal choice because Ken's life was determined by the judge of a trial proceeding. As Ken claims, "the cruelty doesn't reside in saving someone or allowing them to die. It resides in the fact that the choice is removed from the man concerned." There are two predominant viewpoints which have been represented throughout the play. These consist of Ken Harrison and those in favour of his death and Dr Emerson along with those who oppose his death. Ken Harrison feels that he can choose whether or not he lives or dies. Since Ken is paralysed, he can only use his brain and is therefore so dependent on the help of others and machines, he believes that he is basically dead. Since he values his independence, his attitude is that if he can not be independent, there is no point in living. He also values his dignity and would rather die with his dignity intact. However, opposing this viewpoint is Dr Emerson and those who oppose Ken's death. ...read more.

Conclusion

Will you please make the necessary arrangements? Dr Emerson: No. Mr Hill: May I ask why not? Dr Emerson: Because Mr Harrison is incapable of living outside that hospital and it is my duty as a doctor to preserve life. (Anousha and Sabrena end scene and continue with discussion) Anousha: Most religions do not oppose passive euthanasia because believe that it is not morally wrong to allow people to die when they have no hope of recovering; however, Christianity believes that suicide should never be permitted. Instead, it views suicide as an attempt to use a power that belongs only to God. (OHT of quote is displayed on projector) Sabrena: Active Euthanasia is viewed differently. As expressed in a 1979 official report of the Lutheran church, "It is within God's purview alone to decide on the moment when the individual is to share that life which lies beyond death." Their attitude is that no one other than God may assume this power. Anousha: But wait a minute Sabrena what if the patient concerned was so severely disabled that they were constantly in pain or completely dependant on others or machines for their survival. Sabrena: Hmm Anousha that's a tough situation, I have never thought about it that way before. Well I guess every situation depends on the individual's circumstance. (OHT of contact details is displayed on projector) Anousha: For your opinions on any of today's topics please feel free to contact us on 3822 2869 or email us at news@email.com Sabrena: That's all for today, we hope you've enjoyed our broadcast. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    and she seems to be sympathetic of his position but does not pity him. Dr. Scott works hard and seems in control but relaxed at the same time. She is very concerned for all her patients. "Sister. It's Mr. Harrison.

  2. Whose Life is it Anyway? is about Ken Harrison's determination to decide his own ...

    Boyle says to Ken, "They (patients) find a new way of life". She is very hopeful and believes optimistically that patients will some day be presented with a new life that will enlighten their spirit. She believes all can achieve this if only they keep trying.

  1. Whose Life Is It Anyway? How does Brain Clark persuade the audience that Ken's ...

    But sometimes these people aren't always the doctors. Ken gets very upset when Mrs. Boyle, a medical social worker, visits him. She comes to convince Ken he is capable of living a constructive life. This annoys Ken and he uses his well-known sarcasm and puts up a good argument. Mrs.

  2. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    By doing this people thought they were doing well by sacrificing themselves to God, and would consequently go to heaven. Although modern Christians believe that Euthanasia is normally wrong, liberal Christians believe that if someone is committing Euthanasia then they must be in severe pain, and because God is loving, then he will forgive this.

  1. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    not have full dominion over his life and, therefore, cannot positively interfere with his life... Man does have some dominion over the dying process because he can as a matter of fact shorten the time of his dying by not using or discontinuing even readily available means to prolong life" Joseph Fletcher (3), however, completely opposes Grisez and Boyle's position.

  2. How does the playwright Brian Clark present the conflict between Ken Harrison and his ...

    Yours is certainly working." .we smile quite a bit and even laugh. For the same purpose, Clark also introduces a comical character to his play (John), which helps the audience to see some things from a different angle through his jokes.

  1. What are the main issues in the debate about euthanasia.

    that life in itself is valuable, even if there is immense pain and suffering. This means that death should be postponed until the last possible minute, and certainly not put to an end intentionally by any human being. Roman Catholics completely dismiss the idea of any person having a 'right' to die.

  2. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    They continue to argue that such an example should be taken as a warning of what could happen if helping people who are terminally ill to die is made legal. Another striking argument against voluntary euthanasia is that many believe there is a better alternative.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work