• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Ontological Argument

Extracts from this document...


The Ontological Argument - Outline the Ontological Argument for the existence of God and consider the view that while it may strengthen a believer's faith, it has no value for the non-believer. The Ontological argument was first created and developed by a monk called Anselm, (1033-1109.) He defined God as "a being than which nothing greater can be conceived." He then developed his theory by explaining that if God is to be the greatest possible being, he must exist in more than just one's mind. We imagine something better than just a mere idea and since to exist is greater and more perfect than to just be a concept in one's mind and for God to be the greatest possible being, he must exist separately from people's thoughts. In summary, God must therefore exist in reality. Anselm argued that if God only exists in the mind alone, as an idea, then a greater being could be created or imagined to exist. ...read more.


If one proves the existence of God in this manner, surely the existence of anything imagined, for example, the lost island, can also be proved. As Hume said; "We cannot define something into existence - even if it has all the perfections we can imagine." Therefore, the atheist would most definitely be unsatisfied with this argument. Another question an atheist would raise is that what does the word "God" actually mean? The definition of God by Anselm is often criticised, as some people may not be able visualise such an infinitely perfect being, as it is a very abstract idea. This criticism concerns the idea of a "greatest being" and raises the question of whether we really have a concept of this. Is this concept meaningful, or can it be compared and likened to the concept of the most perfect building or the greatest number? This thread of criticism would be rejected by believers, as they accept the premises that God is the greatest possible being, in both mind and reality. ...read more.


However, this again is something that the atheist would persue, as Anselms's statement, "it is greater to be a necessary being, (cannot not be,) than a contingent being, (can cease to exist,)" would not convince them when comparing it to different examples. One such example is that, is it better for a serial rapist to exist than not to exist? Believers need then to explain further to Atheists, what is meant by the word "perfection," and to justify the claim that "existence is perfection." I am therefore concluding that the Ontological Argument is most insufficient to convert or persuade the atheist, as there is no actual proof, just ingenious reasoning, which strengthens and rationalises current beliefs in God. However, perhaps Anselm was not intending to convert those who had doubtable faith in God, because as he once said; "I have written the following treatise in the person of one who...seeks to understand what he believes..." Louise Riddick L6 EU Philosophy Higher IB Mr Skinnard ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    rightly sceptical abut such claims' I agree with Peter Vardy here because if I thought I had seen a UFO I would immediately try and think of other explanations. Vardy goes on to talk about this in more detail saying that if he were to think he saw a UFO

  2. The ontological argument

    exist as we know them; for example, when we separate the horn from the Unicorn the subject of which we are discussing is no longer the subject we were discussing i.e. the Unicorn. Therefore horn forms part of our definition of a Unicorn but of course it does not follow that any Unicorns do exist.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    and the sides (predicate) then the triangle is left with no contradiction. One can define an object as one sees fit, but this definition does not always meet the definition in real life. Descartes then goes on to argue that existence is not a predicate.

  2. Why Some People Become Atheist

    Another reason is that some things people wanted to know about God can't be explained. As Abraham Lincoln quoted: "It will not do to investigate the subject of religion too closely, as it is apt to lead to Infidelity,"

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    being than which none greater can be imagined, "it does not therefore follow that he understands what the word signifies exists actually, but only that it exists mentally." Ren´┐Ż Descartes (1596-1650) resurrected Anselm's argument, stating that the idea of God as a perfect being requires existence.

  2. The Ontological Argument

    So, if God exists his existence is necessary. God's existence does not seem impossible, as it could only be impossible if it would be logically impossible for him to exist. Thus God must be necessary and therefore God must exist.

  1. Describe the ontological argument with reactions and contributions made to it by philosophers.

    Both Descartes and Anselm stated that this tactic could not be applied to anything someone could imagine to exist, such as faries, but can only be applied to a necssary being; a being that must exist and exists independant of cause.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    Thus, Anselm can conclude that his reasoning applies only to possible objects. Anselm might argue that Gaunilo's argument is fundamentally different than his argument. For Gaunilo tries to establish the existence of a kind of thing while Anselm is trying to establish the existence of a particular being .

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work