• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Ontological Argument

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Ontological Argument - Outline the Ontological Argument for the existence of God and consider the view that while it may strengthen a believer's faith, it has no value for the non-believer. The Ontological argument was first created and developed by a monk called Anselm, (1033-1109.) He defined God as "a being than which nothing greater can be conceived." He then developed his theory by explaining that if God is to be the greatest possible being, he must exist in more than just one's mind. We imagine something better than just a mere idea and since to exist is greater and more perfect than to just be a concept in one's mind and for God to be the greatest possible being, he must exist separately from people's thoughts. In summary, God must therefore exist in reality. Anselm argued that if God only exists in the mind alone, as an idea, then a greater being could be created or imagined to exist. ...read more.

Middle

If one proves the existence of God in this manner, surely the existence of anything imagined, for example, the lost island, can also be proved. As Hume said; "We cannot define something into existence - even if it has all the perfections we can imagine." Therefore, the atheist would most definitely be unsatisfied with this argument. Another question an atheist would raise is that what does the word "God" actually mean? The definition of God by Anselm is often criticised, as some people may not be able visualise such an infinitely perfect being, as it is a very abstract idea. This criticism concerns the idea of a "greatest being" and raises the question of whether we really have a concept of this. Is this concept meaningful, or can it be compared and likened to the concept of the most perfect building or the greatest number? This thread of criticism would be rejected by believers, as they accept the premises that God is the greatest possible being, in both mind and reality. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, this again is something that the atheist would persue, as Anselms's statement, "it is greater to be a necessary being, (cannot not be,) than a contingent being, (can cease to exist,)" would not convince them when comparing it to different examples. One such example is that, is it better for a serial rapist to exist than not to exist? Believers need then to explain further to Atheists, what is meant by the word "perfection," and to justify the claim that "existence is perfection." I am therefore concluding that the Ontological Argument is most insufficient to convert or persuade the atheist, as there is no actual proof, just ingenious reasoning, which strengthens and rationalises current beliefs in God. However, perhaps Anselm was not intending to convert those who had doubtable faith in God, because as he once said; "I have written the following treatise in the person of one who...seeks to understand what he believes..." Louise Riddick L6 EU Philosophy Higher IB Mr Skinnard ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    Thus, maximal greatness entails existence in every possible world: since a being that is maximally great at W is omnipotent at every possible world and non-existent beings can't be omnipotent, it follows that a maximally great being exists in every logically possible world.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    This is a syllogism. Russell is saying that existence is not a property of things but the idea of those things. Malcolm argues that stating God possess necessary existence means to conclude logically and acceptably that God must exist.

  1. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    innocent until proven guilty). An example of religious experience is Saul's conversion from a fierce critic to a loyal supporter of the way (Christianity). Saul was on his way to Damascus to arrest Christians when Jesus appeared to him (Acts (9:1-11).

  2. Why Some People Become Atheist

    Another reason is that some things people wanted to know about God can't be explained. As Abraham Lincoln quoted: "It will not do to investigate the subject of religion too closely, as it is apt to lead to Infidelity,"

  1. The ontological argument

    Gaunilo went on to say that the Fool was right in assuming that the concept of the 'most perfect' being exists only in understanding). Anselm claimed that Gaunilo failed in attempting to destroy the argument as he lacked the understanding of Gods attributes, namely that God is a necessary being and therefore cannot be conceived of as not existing.

  2. The ontological argument

    He developed this by saying that to describe something is only to provide an intention concerning an object. Existence is merely an extension of an intention to describe. Concerning the description 'Than than which nothing greater can be conceived', Russell redefined it as the totality of everything that can be imagined by the human mind.

  1. The Ontological Argument.

    (Proslogion, Chapter 2) The second stage of Anselm's argument is that it is illogical to consider that God might not exist: For one can think there exists something that cannot be thought of as not existing [or it is inconceivable for it not to exist], and that would be greater

  2. Describe the ontological argument with reactions and contributions made to it by philosophers.

    Descartes (1596 - 1650) later develops the argument in central texts including the Principles of Philosophy. His version of the argument suports Anselm as he too states that to be perfect God must exist. Howerver it does differs slightly. Descartes' argument is also based on the theory of innate ideas.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work