• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The ontological argument: consequence within the temporal world

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The ontological argument In Anselm's ontological argument he is trying to prove the existence of God, his argument is an argument purely based on the mind and does not require the moral agent to venture into the real of the senses. Ontology is to do with being, or what something is. Anselm's ontological argument concerns existence and whether it is an attribute of God in the same way omnipotence, omniscience and benevolence are believed to be. The argument is an a priori argument. It does not rest on proving God's existence by relying on experimental knowledge but on showing that God must exist logically, or that God's non-existence is illogical. The main idea behind Anselm's argument is that if I can think X to exist X must exist because it is possible to conceive it. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore: (3) There is nothing greater than God that can be imagined. (4) If God does not exist then there is something greater than God that can be imagined. Therefore: (5) God exists. The first premise of this argument, (1), is Anselm's conception of God. (2) is a simple logical truth; if God is the greatest conceivable being then there is no greater conceivable being, (3) follows simply from (1) and (2). Anselm argues in support of (4) by comparing a non-existent God with an existent God. An existent God, says Anselm, is greater than a non-existent God. If God were non-existent, therefore, then we could imagine a God greater than he, namely an existent God, (5) ...read more.

Conclusion

And since it is more excellent not to be in the understanding alone, but to exist both in the understanding and in reality, for this reason it must exist. For if it does not exist, any land which really exists will be more excellent than it; and so the island understood by you to be more excellent will not be more excellent." Simply, Gaunilo was saying just because I can imagine something in my mind does not necessarily mean that it exists, therefore you can picture this perfect island, but because its there in ones mind and there it shall stand until proven. Anselm retorted by saying that his argument only focused on God, and therefore was only applicable to God, so according to Anselm, Gaunilo's argument was totally irellevent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    The first way is based in motion. In order words things move due to an applied external force, for example a hand pushes the cue, which moves the snooker ball. According to Aquinas infinite regress does not exist, eventually it comes back to the first cause, God.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    God exists or doesn't exist 3. Assume God doesn't exist 4. If God does not exist then the Greatest concievable being does not exist 5. You can conceive of existence Greatest concievable being 6. But an exiting Greatest concievable being is greater than a non-existing Greatest concievable being 7.

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    While Kant's criticism is phrased in terms of the logic of predicates, it also makes a plausible metaphysical point. Existence is not a property, rather it is a precondition for the instantiation of properties in the following sense: it is not possible for a non-existent thing to instantiate any properties because there is nothing to which a property can stick.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    The singularity is a violent, terrifying caldron of lawlessness. As Paul Davies notes, 'anything can come out of a naked singularity-in the case of the big bang the universe came out. Its creation represents the instantaneous suspension of physical laws, the sudden, abrupt flash of lawlessness that allowed something to

  1. The Ontological Argument.

    Once he has painted it he has it in his thoughts and thinks that it exists because he has done it... And certainly that greater than which cannot be understood cannot exist only in thought, for if it exists only in thought it could also be thought of existing in reality as well, which is greater.

  2. The ontological argument

    His premises stated that God is the greatest conceivable being and only a fool would believe that God exists only in his understanding and not in reality. This is because it is greater to exist in reality than in understanding therefore as the greatest being He must exist both in understanding and reality.

  1. THE MORAL ARGUMENT

    Sorley claims that unlike Natural Law which is descriptive of human nature, the Moral Law is prescriptive. It describes not what IS but what SHOULD BE. The Natural Law approach to Ethics stems from Aristotle and was developed by St.

  2. What are the main theological concerns within the Book of Deuteronomy?

    Such icons and images were seen to 'impugn the sovereignty of God', representative of a re-working of the unknowable image of God into a specific form to suit the needs of the Israelites6. Such actions were seen as blasphemous by the Deuteronomists, as well as blatantly disregarding the Ten Commandments (5:6-21).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work