• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The ontological argument: consequence within the temporal world

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The ontological argument In Anselm's ontological argument he is trying to prove the existence of God, his argument is an argument purely based on the mind and does not require the moral agent to venture into the real of the senses. Ontology is to do with being, or what something is. Anselm's ontological argument concerns existence and whether it is an attribute of God in the same way omnipotence, omniscience and benevolence are believed to be. The argument is an a priori argument. It does not rest on proving God's existence by relying on experimental knowledge but on showing that God must exist logically, or that God's non-existence is illogical. The main idea behind Anselm's argument is that if I can think X to exist X must exist because it is possible to conceive it. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore: (3) There is nothing greater than God that can be imagined. (4) If God does not exist then there is something greater than God that can be imagined. Therefore: (5) God exists. The first premise of this argument, (1), is Anselm's conception of God. (2) is a simple logical truth; if God is the greatest conceivable being then there is no greater conceivable being, (3) follows simply from (1) and (2). Anselm argues in support of (4) by comparing a non-existent God with an existent God. An existent God, says Anselm, is greater than a non-existent God. If God were non-existent, therefore, then we could imagine a God greater than he, namely an existent God, (5) ...read more.

Conclusion

And since it is more excellent not to be in the understanding alone, but to exist both in the understanding and in reality, for this reason it must exist. For if it does not exist, any land which really exists will be more excellent than it; and so the island understood by you to be more excellent will not be more excellent." Simply, Gaunilo was saying just because I can imagine something in my mind does not necessarily mean that it exists, therefore you can picture this perfect island, but because its there in ones mind and there it shall stand until proven. Anselm retorted by saying that his argument only focused on God, and therefore was only applicable to God, so according to Anselm, Gaunilo's argument was totally irellevent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    equivalent to the claim that the concept of a maximally great being is not self-contradictory; for the only things that don't exist in any possible world are things that are conceptually defined in terms of contradictory properties. There is no logically possible world in which a square circle exists (given the relevant concepts)

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    This argument demonstrates that things come into existence because an external object or thing has caused them to, in a succession of event. However, this succession of events cannot go back to the beginning of time, therefore there must have been a necessary being outside of time and place, that

  1. The ontological argument

    Kant argues that it is possible to accept that a proposal is true by definition (the subject and predicate of the proposition are inseparable) and yet the subject doesn't refer to anything in this world. There are inseparable predicates that when taken from the concept of the subject cease to

  2. THE MORAL ARGUMENT

    C.S. Lewis also argued to the existence of God from the claim that there exists absolute moral laws. His approach is similar to that of Sorley but he develops the argument in rather more detail.

  1. What are the main theological concerns within the Book of Deuteronomy?

    The refutation of polytheistic beliefs within Deuteronomy naturally led to the rejection of any symbol or object being erected by the people in the place of YHWH (5:8; 4:1-40). The Deuteronomists assumed that YHWH would never fully reveal himself to the Israelites and therefore refuted the formulation of images on the earth that were erected and worshipped as YHWH.

  2. Looking at Aldous Huxley's, A Brave New World.

    Humans "know" they did not create themselves, resulting in the notion of "God." Naturally, because ideas do not come out of nowhere, an idea can not be false. Because the idea of God is the highest of all ideas, and ideas are true, then God must exist.

  1. The Ontological Argument.

    Anslem presented his argument in two stages: The first statement of the argument is that existence is the greatest possible attribute God can have: For when a painter thinks ahead to what he will paint, he has that picture in his thought, but he does not yet think it exists, because he has not done it yet.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    on the Fool", which stated that the God could not be conceptualised by human being. He stated that the fool would make an objection because if the god could exist in his mind, other unreal thing also could exist. Gaunilo supported his criticism using a parody on Anselm's argument in which he proves the existence of the most excellent island.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work