• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Ontological Argument - Explain and Criticise.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Ontological Argument Explain and Criticise The fundamental Ontological argument is hidden beneath the definition of God, it does not require evidence of any sort for it deduces the existence of God simply from the meaning of the word, "God". "God exists" is an analytical statement, as is the word spinster. We automatically know from the word spinster that she is a woman and that she is single. To say she was happy would be synthetic because we would have to observe her. The Ontological argument maintains that "God exists" is analytically true, we can find out whether God exists by coming to an understanding of the word "God". Anselm was a Christian theologian, with this argument he was not trying to prove the existence of God to Atheists, but was trying to reinforce God's existence to those who believed and in a way, make them realise it is sensible to believe in God. He attempts proof by looking at the concept of God, Anselm believed that in order for an atheist to deny God they must have had an initial concept of God in their mind in the first place in order for them to deny him. So, when they deny the existence of God and Anselm's conception they must first agree that they had an initial definition of God in order to deny. ...read more.

Middle

that the idea was any less perfect because it did not exist in reality. We are able to describe fictitious things without them actually existing and yet other people can understand that they are fictitious. However, Anselm had an answer to this; the island (perfect in every way) has a beginning and an end and is composed of parts, but God is unique. Anselm argued that Gaunilo's rejection of his argument was invaluable, it could not be applied to God because God is a unique being. Descartes reinforced the argument later on in his Meditations. In Descartes argument he made existence one of the predicates. A predicate is one of the characteristics in which feature on the object in question. For example, one person's predicates of God could be loving, caring, humane, optimistic etc but existence would always be a predicate of God. Descartes used an example of a triangle saying that the three angles of a triangle adding up to 180degrees make up the essence of a triangle, it would not be a triangle if it's three angles did not add up to 180. Similarly, God could not be thought of as God without being thought of as existing, existence is necessary to the idea and concept of God. ...read more.

Conclusion

God's existence is not possible 5. Therefore, God's existence is necessary From 1, Malcolm was implying that the concept of God cannot be a chance product. If the rest of the argument is right then God exists. Once one possesses the possibility of God then it is assumed that one is agreeing that God is necessary. Once one has a full understanding of God then God can exist. However, if this argument is true it destroys the point of religious faith, the relationship people have with God would be worthless. All the things that matter to a Christian, faith, prayer and trust are all elements in believing in God which are worth something to a Christian, but people would have no choice in believing in God, they will have to believe in God. Christians argue that God's existence should never be proven. In conclusion I believe this argument is irrelevant, I think God's existence should be intrinsic nothing can prove it apart from one's personal experiences and trust in God's power to help you through hard times. It would be nice if there was an all loving God, but how can you think that when such things as cancer and death and war are present wherever you go. If there is a God, where does God come from? God cannot have created himself before he had a 'self' to create with. Page 1 of 3 Samantha Johnson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    that exists in every world and in some world has a degree of greatness that is nowhere excelled. Of course it doesn't follow that the being in question has this degree of greatness in this world. So, the argument restated by Plantinga was, 1.

  2. The Ontological Argument - Describe and explain the ontological argument for the existence ...

    The problem most have with this argument is that it seems to simply list existence among God's attributes, rather than show it. The argument appears to say whatever you can imagine should be true in reality. Descartes claimed "God exists" is true, if we know what it means to talk of God.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    The first way is based in motion. In order words things move due to an applied external force, for example a hand pushes the cue, which moves the snooker ball. According to Aquinas infinite regress does not exist, eventually it comes back to the first cause, God.

  2. The ontological argument

    Bertrand Russell and Gottlob Frege agreed with Kant when criticising the Ontological argument. Russell said that 'Existence is quite definitely not a predicate'. This proposition was based on the idea that it doesn't describe a property of the subject. Frege argued that 'existence' is just another way of saying there

  1. The Ontological Argument.

    Further Reading * Other Versions of the Ontological Argument * Objections to the Ontological Argument ________________________________________________________ Footnotes [1] The basic tenets of classical theism in Christianity are that God has the attributes of omnipotence, omniscience, omnipresence and benevolence. God is also believed to be outside time (eternal), knows the future (predestination), and can act in the world (miracles).

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    finite size (which there would be if the universe were flat or hyperbolic), then there must be an infinite number of points constitutive of the singularity. These points exist instantaneously (at the first instant of time) and then explode in an infinitely extended big bang.

  1. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    Secondly Kant points out that the conclusion of the argument is indeterminate with regard to God. It does not demonstrate God's infinity. These are reasonable reservations: Apodeictic certainty is not available in science and even less so in metaphysics. The design argument is an inductive argument and will not give a philosophical proof.

  2. Describe the ontological argument with reactions and contributions made to it by philosophers.

    He states that God is a being "that than which nothing greater can be conceived." Anselm's argument is that if God as a perfect being exists in our mind he must exist in reality as a God that did not exist could not be perfect.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work