• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Ontological Argument is a logical sleight of hand." Discuss

Extracts from this document...


"The Ontological Argument is a logical sleight of hand." Discuss The ontological argument for the existence of God is perhaps the only argument which makes use of logic and a priori statements to support its reasoning. If the argument is successful, it proves that God's existence is logically necessary, and therefore, the existence of God is proven. The first thing the ontological argument tries to do is to provide a definition for the word 'God'. This is necessary in order to justify that the statement 'God exists' is true - in other words, it is an analytic statement, which supporters of the argument accept to be true. St. Anselm of Canterbury defined God as "that than which nothing greater can be conceived," and maintained that this definition would be accepted by both believers and non-believers. He states that God exists in the mind, but he must also exist in reality, because God is "that than which nothing greater can be conceived", and it is better to exist both in the mind and in reality. ...read more.


- when existence should really be a second-order predicate - something that tells a concept about the subject. If I used another example to illustrate this, it would be similar to saying "the mountains are green" ('green' being the first predicate). This tells us about the nature of the mountains - that they are green. But if I said afterwards, "the mountains are numerous", this is about a concept, not about the nature of mountains, and adds nothing new to my knowledge and understanding of mountains. Therefore the word 'numerous' must be classed as a second-order predicate, as Frege says the word 'existence' should. Bertrand Russell was another philosopher who criticized the use of vocabulary in the presenting of the ontological argument. Russell felt that everyday language was misleading, and often insufficient to describe philosophical ideas. He developed the concept of "philosophical logic" which uses words in the layout of a mathematical formula to present ideas in a simple way. This philosophical logic is similar to a syllogism. ...read more.


Of course, Gaunilo's island is representative of God. However, this argument does not successfully refute Anselm's one, because Gaunilo is comparing two things that belong to the same category (the perfect island, and other islands), while God is defined by Anselm as being "that than which nothing greater can be conceived", and so cannot belong to the same category as anything else. Therefore, Gaunilo's analogy does not undermine Anselm's Proslogian 2. In my opinion, I believe that the ontological argument is largely just a play on words, a logical sleight of hand that makes use of too many ambiguous words and also words that cannot even be properly defined. Although it does have its strengths, in that it is logical, and does not rely on experience which can be unreliable, I think that there are too many valid criticisms that go against this proof of God for it to be fully workable. Therefore, I believe the criticisms outweigh the strengths of this argument, and it is not a particularly strong one in proving the existence of God. Heidie Park 12HS3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The ontological argument

    Immanuel Kant is another Christian Philosopher, who lived a century after Descarte, to criticise the Ontological argument. The proposition 'God necessarily exists' is said to be analytic by both Anselm and Descarte, Kant however said that it does not necessarily follow, even thought the proposition is true by definition (that God exists).

  2. Bertrand Russell and Atheism.

    With that, I believe that no matter what we do on this Earth, be it good or bad, we will all move on to our next existence when we die. I'll bring it back to the caterpillar yet again. What happens if one caterpillar eats another caterpillar? That was bad!

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    However, if (P3) were synthetically necessary its application would not be restricted to a certain empirical domain but could be construed as applying to everything, even the big bang singularity. (P3), like (P2), could be used to rule out on a priori grounds the atheistic interpretation of big bang cosmology.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Even if Gaunillo had described an island which was 'that which nothing greater can be conceived' it would still not be valid because islands have no intrinsic maximum; one can always add another tree, pond, lagoon etc., something can always be added.

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    Islands are contingent in that they either can or cannot exist whereas God is a necessary being that must exist. Anselm argued that God is the only being to which the ontological argument can apply because he is the only being whose non-existence is inconceivable.

  2. The Ontological Argument

    If God does not exist then he cannot come into existence for if he did he would be nothing more than a contingent being which would make him a limited being. Since he cannot come into exist, if he does not exist then his existence is impossible.

  1. Describe the ontological argument with reactions and contributions made to it by philosophers.

    God must exist because existence is a predicate of a perfect being. Therefore God must exist to avoid being self-contradictory. Descartes demonstrates that trying to imagine God without the predicate of existence is like trying to imagine a triangle without three sides.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    However, Gaunilo, a contemporary of Anselm and a fellow Catholic, argued that Anselm's ontological argument is invalid, because an argument of the same form could have true premises and a false conclusion therefore, he introduced perfect island argument which is perfectly parallel to ontological argument.one must imagine what characteristics would constitute `the greatest conceivable island.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work