The Problem of Evil
The problem has been summed up very nicely by Epicurus
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent. Is he able but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil?
David Hume in Dialogues states:
Why is there any misery in the world? Not by chance surely. From some cause then. Is it then from the intention of the deity? But he is perfectly benevolent. Is it contrary to his intention? But he is almighty. Nothing can shake the solidity of this reasoning. So short, so clear, so decisive...."
Try to think of someone who is really evil?
Is it possible to find someone totally evil? Many think of Hitler but even he had some good points - he was loyal, he recreated Germany into a successful economy with pride in its self - the fact that he slaughtered millions of innocent people in the process obviously makes it difficult for us to concentrate on his good parts but it does not preclude us from acknowledging them. The same can be said of many leaders throughout history - General Franco, Guy Fawkes, General Sherman - all are either celebrated for their heroics but were also people who carried out tremendous evils. - Nothing is ever as simple as pure good and pure evil.
This leads us to the question - what is evil? Are evil and suffering the same? Can suffering ever lead to good? Can suffering be ennobling?
The problem has been summed up very nicely by Epicurus
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent. Is he able but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Whence then is evil?
David Hume in Dialogues states:
Why is there any misery in the world? Not by chance surely. From some cause then. Is it then from the intention of the deity? But he is perfectly benevolent. Is it contrary to his intention? But he is almighty. Nothing can shake the solidity of this reasoning. So short, so clear, so decisive...."
Try to think of someone who is really evil?
Is it possible to find someone totally evil? Many think of Hitler but even he had some good points - he was loyal, he recreated Germany into a successful economy with pride in its self - the fact that he slaughtered millions of innocent people in the process obviously makes it difficult for us to concentrate on his good parts but it does not preclude us from acknowledging them. The same can be said of many leaders throughout history - General Franco, Guy Fawkes, General Sherman - all are either celebrated for their heroics but were also people who carried out tremendous evils. - Nothing is ever as simple as pure good and pure evil.
This leads us to the question - what is evil? Are evil and suffering the same? Can suffering ever lead to good? Can suffering be ennobling?