• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Problem of Evil.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Dima Alexandrov The Problem of Evil The Judaeo/Christian tradition is founded upon the belief that there exists a supernatural personal being who is the ultimate creator and to which all other beings owe their existence. Three major characteristics are ascribed to this being (God?), that of being wholly good, wholly powerful (omnipotent) and all knowing (omniscient). This is the foundation of western religious thought and it is these characteristics and their relationship with evil which comprise the theme of this essay. I intend to show that the existence of evil is not a sufficient justification for the non-existence of God. I will argue that a wholly good, wholly powerful, God can co-exist with Evil. This does not mean that, as a consequence, I will argue that a wholly good, wholly powerful, God exists; I simply intend to argue that the presence of Evil itself is not a sufficient reason for denying the existence of a God. Evil can conveniently be thought as being split into two general classifications: 1. Human evil, such as when a person or even a state treats someone badly. OR 2. Natural evil, for example volcanic eruptions, famine and floods. Of course whilst convenient, the two broad categories of evil cannot be mutually exclusive incorporating as they do, what might be thought of as a 'crossover effect'. ...read more.

Middle

For example, gravity can sometimes be harmful but at other times it may also benefit us. When we speak of free-will we need to be clear in our understanding of what an omnipotent, benevolent being would be able to do and not do. A condition of God allowing free-will means that man (that is man in the biblical sense) must have the freedom to choose between a good action and an evil action, it simply wouldn't be logical for God to endow mankind with free-will only to remove freedom of action when an evil act is about to be committed. With that in mind, it follows that there has to be a limit to His omnipotence and omnibenevolence. Furthermore, once God has granted free-will, and considering the myriad of choices mankind has to make during his existence, either collectively or individually, it must be that at some time during mankind's existence an evil choice is made. This is the argument to justify 'original sin' as an attribute of mankind, the theological idea of mankind's fallen nature. From the principle of an omnipotent God allowing free-will, He would also be bound to allow evil in mankind. From that standpoint we get a clearer understanding of what an all-knowing (omniscient) God can do. Similarly, He would not know which choice, subsequent to a given event, mankind would make. ...read more.

Conclusion

(Hick, John. Dialogues in the Philosophy of Religion (Palgrave 2001), p. 9.) This view of Hick is a rational interpretation of the relationships between God, mankind and evil. Mankind, having free-will, is neither an automaton nor mildly accepting of 'God's Will'. Mankind questions, predicts and influences events, so illness is treated and cured and natural disasters are predicted and defences built. Armed with free-will, mankind has the opportunity to counter evil (be it natural or human). On this interpretation God looks upon mankind as an ally in His fight against worldly evil, not seeing mankind as born into evil needing to be saved by Him, but seeing mankind as accepting subjects, accepting of both God and his code of morals. It is humanity's lot to be born, to live and finally to die, there is no avoiding that. But if we seek to leave a slightly happier world behind us, then it would be consistent to always seek to pursue the good, to care for nature and for all things natural and to try to help our fellow beings grow and develop. Of course, the worthy ideal of leaving a better place behind has to be tempered with a degree of realism. We have to accept that our individual efforts may hardly seem adequate. One man can only achieve so much and yet, if only for the sake of generations to come, mankind simply cannot refuse the struggle. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. What is the problem of evil?

    Outline and evaluate the success of two attempts to solve this problem St Augustine (AD354-430) tried to solve this problem and based his arguments on the Bible - especially the accounts of the creation and the fall in Genesis.

  2. What do religious believers mean by the 'problem of suffering?' Select any two ...

    and contradictions which are its downfall and it does not in my opinion give a convincing argument. A potentially more convincing theodicy is John Hick's Irenaean theodicy. This is based on ideas set by St Irenaeus in 120-202 AD and developed by Hick at a later point.

  1. The problem of evil.

    reality of it every time we turn on the news and are faced with yet another accident, abduction, murder or terrorist attack. Writers such as Gaskin have attempted to classify evil. Two particular classifications have been suggested Moral Evil and Natural Evil.

  2. Good and Evil

    Christians trust the belief that God, the creator is perfectly good, always loving and has never done anything wrong. To support this, Christians would use this quote from the Bible, "the Lord is gracious and full of compassion, slow to anger and great in mercy".

  1. Why does God allow Evil if he is omnipotent, omniscient and perfectly benevolent?

    and no point of existing so you could say that "Free Will" is worth all the suffering but then is god not evil to make a decision he knew would make our lives extraordinary but filled with suffering? Could he not do so we have a "Free Will" but a will of making and creating peace, prosperity and love?

  2. Theodici of Evil

    He believed that Evil was not created by God, but was just an absence of Goodness. For example, God did not create darkness, he created light. He created life and justice, but did not create injustice and loss of life.

  1. Discuss the Problem of Evil

    Madeline McKan?s kidnapping taught thousands of people to be more careful when leaving young children on their own). This implies therefore that there can be no true good without evil as making the good choices in life involves overcoming the evil ones.

  2. The Holocaust - personal response to Anne Frank's diary and the problem of evil ...

    She was also used to not getting any kind of attention from her busy parents and sister, who attended school. Anne also went to school (but was later moved to a Jewish Secondary School) and loved to read and write (which is where she picked up the skills to write her famous diary).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work