• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Teleological Argument.

Extracts from this document...


The Teleological Argument (a) The aim of the teleological argument like so many others is to attempt to prove the existence of God or another 'Being' that created the world. This argument is a posteriori meaning that it is based on experience and also inductive meaning that there is no certainty in the outcome. This means that this argument cannot prove either way if the existence of God is a certain fact. The word 'telos' means end or 'goal'. This signifies that the argument proves that everything has a particular goal or purpose in life, which will eventually come to an end. This argument aims to contradict Darwin's theory of natural selection. Bishop Samuel Wilberforce at a meeting of the British Association in 1860 said, 'The principle of natural selection... is absolutely incompatible with God.' The three basic rules that the argument follows are: the world has purpose, regularity and beauty. This means that all that exists in the world is too intricate and complicated to have 'just happened.' Many believe that these three factors signify an omnipotent being of which we are trying to understand. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274) states in the 'Summa Theologica', 'Everything in the world, living or dead has a purpose or an "end." This cannot simply be put down to just chance but design, since things which lack intelligence need to be directed to their end by a being with intelligence - God. It is like the archer who shots the arrow.' Aquinas believed in the teleological argument but he states that as our lives would indeed end on earth, we will go on living with God in heaven. The first factor to be considered is that the world has a purpose. Paley, (1802 ) 'Natural Theology' states probably the most famous and simple explanation of the teleological argument. In this, Paley makes the analogy of the world with a watch. ...read more.


This argument would not convince the sceptic, but nevertheless many have found the scintillating beauty of the world a sign of an intelligent being behind it. Although the teleological arguments on the surface sound very convincing and show a great deal of evidence to support God, they can still be criticised. The first argument I introduced was Paley's analogy of the watch. David Hume (1757) who was possibly the greatest writer concerning the teleological argument criticised the arguments heavily. In his book, 'Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion', Hume introduced three characters; Cleanthes - who believes in Natural Theology and argues a posteriori to God, Demea - who also believes in God and whose arguments are a priori and Philo - who is their critic and puts forward Hume's own arguments. He rejected Paley's argument twenty-two years before he put it forward. Hume says that it is impossible to make the analogy of the universe with a human artefact Hume's arguments are very strong. The idea of Paley's analogy is weak indeed, the world is like no man made object. Hume's argument is 'we only know that the watch was made by a watch maker because we saw it being made, whereas we don't know how the universe was made because we have never seen one being made.' I believe that Hume's argument that 'we only know if something has been made if we see it being made' is inconsistent, is he trying to suggest that if we look at a house, it doesn't suggest a builder simply because we didn't see it being built? He also argues about things that have other mechanical contrivances like plants, he says, 'plants and living things come into the world through reproduction and grow organically, Why is it not possible that the world is more like a plant rather than a watch. Therefore the world doesn't need a maker.' ...read more.


If he had then we would not be living our own living our lives choosing each day as we do, between good and evil because there would only be one choice. Another possible thought is 'Heaven.' The classical theist view of heaven in one word is 'paradise.' Could it not be that this life is a way of judging those who are worthy or not of going to heaven. If we live out good lives on earth having faith and trust in God (a metaphysical being) we will go to heaven. Those people who decide to turn their back on God and turn to evil shall be punished. This thought is pleasing to those who live a good life, as the person who kills and takes advantage of people on earth and get away with it, will have to answer before God. The weakest of the three fundamentals of the teleological argument is 'order'. Order doesn't necessarily need to be explained by the fact that there is a God. It is thought that we are intelligent enough beings to create our own order on things. Ultimately it is my opinion that the intelligence that we have to either recognise this or place order on ourselves comes from God. If you look around the world at the intricacies especially, you cannot help to wonder how everything fits together. The chances of this just being a random fact are too large to be comprehensible. Yet, just as two different people can interpret one piece of evidence differently, for the teleological argument to be creditable it has to satisfy both the theist and the atheist. I don't believe it does this as Hume and Kant have provided very good counter arguments. I believe that Kant makes a good point in the 'Moral Argument', 'We have a sense of morality. The world would be impossible without this objection morality given to us by God.' It is up to us at the end of the day, whether we have the faith to believe in God or not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Good and Evil

    Love, he said, "is the only force capable of transforming an enemy to a friend" and his convictions of course came from the Bible, Jesus' words. As usual, what Jesus preached he practiced, he forsook all His divine rights to live in all his glory and power, and instead took

  2. 'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

    The physical constraints of each of these domains all are very different. Our own observable universe would be just a very minute part of one of these domains. To adopt this proposal however is equally as problematic as accepting the alternative.

  1. Outline the design argument for the existence of God. The teleological argument is an ...

    This agent was God. In the 20th Century, Arthur Brown supported this argument. He said, "The ozone layer is a might example of the creator's forethought". Design qua Purpose says that the way things work for a specific reason, and the way that they are set for a reason shows

  2. God- The Great Geometer

    The connection between the solids of Pythagoras and the disposition of the planets could admit but one explanation: the hand of god, geometer. Symmetry in nature is varied and widespread- in water, a cylinder, bark of a tree, stones, convection, corn circles, the human body, starfish, step patterns of a

  1. T H E C O S M O L O G ...

    If 'necessary being' means only 'imperishable being', then the universe itself may be necessary. This is similar to Russell's point in his debate with Copleston. IF one accepts (and Russell did not) that things in the world are contingent, why should not the Universe as a whole be necessary?

  2. Willam Paley'sVersion of the Teleological Argument

    The second part of the argument - design qua purpose, the theory that everything has been designed to for fill some purpose. It looks at the evidence of design in a slightly different way. It looks at the way in which parts of the universe seem to fit together for some sort of purpose.

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    The first step is the introduction of the so-called 'Einstein equation,' which is the heart of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity.8 Einstein's equation says, in simplified terms, that the geometry (curvature) of spacetime is determined by the distribution of mass and energy in spacetime.

  2. The design argument for the existence of God (also called the teleological argument).

    (1802): In crossing a heath, suppose I pitched my foot against a stone, and were asked how the stone came to be there, I might possibly answer, that for any thing I knew to the contrary it had lain there for ever; nor would it, perhaps be very easy to show the absurdity of this answer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work