• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25

The value of choice the dilemma of charitable choice and the further funding of faith-based initiatives.

Extracts from this document...


Georgetown Public Policy Institute The Value of choice the dilemma of Charitable Choice and the further funding of faith-based initiatives -- Ethics June 30, 2003 CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 I. The Issue 5 II. Values Involved 7 III. Analytical Frames 8 IV. Alternative Solutions 20 V. Summary and Conclusion.....................................21 BIBLIOGRAPHY 24 Appendices I. Charitable Choice Legislation (House Resolution 7) Executive Summary In the aftermath of September 11th, and with the continuing financial burden of the war against terrorism and Iraq, it is imperative that we maximize the utilization of every tax dollar. We, as citizens, must insist that services be provided in the most efficient and quality-saving method. Given the level and depth of social services entitled today's population and the fact that tens of millions may be currently served by them, faith-based charities could be an important and valuable resource for the provision of services, and warrant the support of the federal government. However, we must not do so at the expense of the integrity of the relationship of church and state or the soundness of the faith-based organizations themselves. Perhaps the most contentious point in this debate is the question, "Whose faith?" There is great fear among advocates of a strong separation of church and state that particular faiths will be favored, intentionally and unintentionally. Conversely, there are some who fear this initiative will allow government funds to subsidize services provided by faith-based groups whose philosophies and practices they believe to be dangerous. Both points raise an important question of values. Through the use of existing statistical data, the research of philosophical and modern text, the analysis of policy briefs and position papers, and first hand experience working with and within government funded faith-based organizations; this paper analyzes the policy decisions regarding faith-based funding and the ethics behind this proposal. In particular, I utilized several frames of reference to study this issue; philosophy, law, economics, religion, culture, demography, corruption, politics, science and technology, and organization and management. ...read more.


3. It safeguards the religious freedom of beneficiaries, both those who are willing to receive services from religious organizations and those who object to receiving services from such organizations.12 Beyond the scope of these goals and the form of the legislation, we must also look at the origins and history that will regulate this proposal, which leads us to the Constitution and the separation of church and state. Interestingly enough, the phrase "separation of church and state" is nowhere to be found in the Constitution or its amendments. This phrase was first seen in a letter written by then President Thomas Jefferson in response to a congratulatory note from a Baptist group. Jefferson's letter, dated January 1, 1802, contained this sentence: "Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach action only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and State."13 In the 1947 case of Everson v. Board of Education, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black paraphrased this letter in a summation of the purpose of the Establishment Clause: "In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment was intended to erect a 'wall of separation' between church and State." "That wall," he added, "must be kept high and impregnable."14 The case signaled the Supreme Court's belief that the opening words of the First Amendment ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . .") requires nothing less than the separation of church and state. Indeed, most of the Supreme Court's church-state decisions in the last fifty years, with occasional exceptions, have been grounded in a fundamental commitment to the Everson standard and the "wall of separation" approach. ...read more.


If the legislation itself is appropriate, then we must now look at the dangers involved in implementation. The most dangerous threat to these organizations, and the success of the Faith Based Initiative, is the threat of dependency. Throughout the years, society has witnessed the development and funding of organizations by the government, only to see the demise of these once strong organizations as federal funding disappears. Faith-based organizations, who initially welcome funding as an added resource to their mission, may soon realize not only their own dependency, but also that of their community, upon this funding. As funding dwindles and pressure comes to bear, how will these organizations separate themselves from the politics and issues of their funding? Can they continue to be "prophetic critics of government?"20 Ironically, given that the focus of many faith-based organizations is the reduction in dependency upon welfare, government funding may quickly become the very thing that faith-based organizations themselves depend on. Regarding this and other issues, I must concur with John Locke. Any decisions made by faith-based groups to apply and receive funding, is their choice and their responsibility. If they believe this opportunity is the best way to achieve their goal and utility, then they should participate. If they realize overwhelming danger to their mission and identity then they should abstain. The key issue here is choice, which relates back to the founding principals of Charitable Choice and the Faith-Based Initiative - to allow faith-based organizations the right to compete and choose without discrimination because of their beliefs. Then Sen. Ashcroft surmises this effort here: One of my goals in proposing the charitable choice provision was to encourage faith-based organizations to expand their involvement in the welfare reform effort by providing assurances that their religious integrity would be protected. The charitable choice provision embodies U.S. Supreme Court case precedents to clarify what is constitutionally permissible when states and local governments cooperate with the religious and charitable sector of society. The provision protects the rights of faith-based providers as well as the religious liberty of the individuals they may serve. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Miracles section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Miracles essays

  1. Miracles are about faith, not fact. Discuss.

    It does not matter to the believer that the reliable laws of nature have been broken. They are more concerned with why God needs to interfere. If God's creation was perfect then He should not need to change it in any way.

  2. To what extent is faith a legitimate basis for knowledge claims, in religion and ...

    Whereas in contrast to that, the Imperiacle method requires merely a small step of faith to acquire that knowledge. For example, a priest would argue that although there is a lack of widespread agreement over knowledge through faith, there is a sense of certainty in the individual.

  1. is faith a legitimate basis for knowledge claims?

    Does this mean that science will end up disproving all of its own theories just because certain facts are freshly discovered? What's the point in studying science in high school then? What we end up doing is grasping laws and their applications, so we say that we have knowledge of

  2. The Analytical Essay

    He has institutional power that comes from being rich and having access to the functions of Opus Dei. Much of the protagonists actions are as a reaction to the antagonist's plans. He drives the plot and energizes the story. Thus this thriller differs in its extraordinarily masterminded antagonist.

  1. Tim Winton in his 'quintessentially Australian' novel Cloudstreet challenges modern perceptions of spirituality with ...

    As Tim Winton says ' I remember looking at the landscape, and apprehending the God through that'. This reinforces to readers that the search for spirituality in our lives is inevitable, because it is omnipresent and can be found even in inanimate objects.

  2. A Biblical Mentoring Relationship: The Story of Elisha

    The two ended up going down to Bethel. Elisha's sons came to him and told him that the Lord was going to take Elijah away. It was time for Elisha's ministry to begin (2 King 2:1-6). As Elijah performed one of his final miracles, he rolled up his cloak and struck the Jordan with it.

  1. Keeping the Faith

    Jake finished the relationship because his job means that he had to marry a Jewish girl and Anna is not Jewish. Anna is very upset and turns to her friend Brain to get some support. He doesn't listen to Anna and tells her that he loves her and is prepared to give up his job for her.

  2. To what extend is faith a legitimate basis for knowledge claims, in religion and ...

    Our reason allows us to analyze things to a certain level however when we can't ONLY use our reasoning; we must also use our faith. Faith is "the belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence". Faith cannot be defined as something ONLY religious.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work