• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Theory of Knowledge.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Theory of Knowledge Willy Gunawan INTRODUCTION: Everyone from all society is related to a belief, to God or others that is believed to have higher power than humans. This technically means that everyone was born believing the existence of afterlife or superiors. I will focus this presentation on the existence of God as the Creator, and the judge on our afterlife. Humans have a unique ability to pass knowledge down to the next generation; it is a very important skill for an advancement of life, and technology. For example we don't have to test how acid can burn the skin off because it has become a knowledge passed by an authority. Biases in approach to knowledge: We live in the world that is biased in approaching to the knowledge by conviction, such as religions and beliefs. I am hat no one in this world can claim that they are skeptics and atheists to the bone. They would have doubt about the existence of God, what will happen afterlife and I am infact almost certain that if there is a plane filled with the most well known skeptics and atheists, and the plane is crashing down these people would shout out, "God, Help us" etc. ...read more.

Middle

I don't have any idea on what hell would be for the Vikings, perhaps it is a peaceful quiet place where there is no argument! As you can see heaven and hell is modified to an extent it is loved and hated by the civilization this is a simple yet valid proof that these spiritual beliefs are made for a purpose. These hypotheses on how the world was created has advance over time too. Let us see one of our oldest civilizations in the world and their beliefs. The aborigines have a less complex and a rather simple way of explaining how the world was created in comparison with Christian's, Islamic and Jewish Orthodoxy way of explaining the creation of the world. This I believe is due to the fact that the level of knowledge has changed over the time. The faithful believers may say that they have proofs; I can recall that when I was still in my fifth grade, I argued with a priest and she told me all these miracles that God has done in the past, My best approach on this is that the people at biblical time have mistakenly regard natural phenomenon and disaster as God's action. ...read more.

Conclusion

"Today it is the public-school teachers, tomorrow the private, the next day the preachers and the lecturers, the magazines, the books, the newspapers. After a while, Your Honour it is the setting of a man against man and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums, we are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth century when bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind." Our perception has been shaped since we were young, and has developed within a society that has strong belief of existence of God. It is very hard to change, and even if we can change our perception and beliefs, it takes time and to completely wipe off these spiritual beliefs from our world will take generations and generations. Religions, spiritual beliefs, they have made mistakes, and they will make mistakes again the biggest questions that arise from this is... Do we still have to believe it? When will we stop believing it? Only time will answer this question, even though I will not be able to live to see it, I am sure we will one day become a society that justify with logic, and empirical evidence! I am certain that we will be able to be perfect rationalists and live in harmony. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Living In a Plural Society.

    We should be thankful to him, as he gave his live when he died on the cross for us. They also believe that they should live their lives sin free to allow them to access heaven, be acceptable to God and to live a pure life.

  2. Compare the respective approaches of rationalism and empiricism towards a theory of knowledge ...

    based on the idea that all knowledge comes from the senses, so to a empiricist, shouldn't this be the most certain rather than indecisive. Berkeley thought that objects did not possess power. The only reason that the object exists is because we perceive.

  1. What are the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain", and is ...

    If we are generous to George W. Bush II, we could say that he was passionately convinced of the existence of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq, and that, that 'knowledge' prompted him to bring that country to ruin. Again being generous to Bush II, we can say that it

  2. Suffering in Religions of the World

    The question these two elements raise is whether suffering is deserved if man is given freewill?

  1. What is Knowledge? Explain and Illustrate

    Experience Some experience is somewhat vague. People sometimes say something along the lines of: "Sometimes our senses mislead us; we perceive things as having qualities that they don't. Perhaps our senses totally mislead us and we could be constantly dreaming of what he see, hear, smell, taste and touch" Thinking like this can be very dangerous and lead to complete mistrust for anything.

  2. Is there knowledge we should not seek? Or is all knowledge inherently a good ...

    a crime, which obviously can never be advantageous to anyone except criminals. To give another example, nuclear weapons are undeniably destructive; thus, logically nuclear science is dangerous because of its application in this regard. Now we have a paradox - is knowledge both harmful and beneficial?[SBSB1] Before answering the question, I would like to explain the neutrality of matter first.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Thus, the father is viewed with ambivalence. This desire to possess the mother and ambivalence to the father is the Oedipus complex. Freud goes on to state that "In the conditions of our civilisation it is invariably doomed to a frightening end." As a result the child repress the memory.

  2. "God may have separated the heavens from the earth - He did not separate ...

    Science uses three fundamental methods to distinguish and categorise the subjects that it holds. If we look into science in its current meaning -referred only to mathematics, logics and the sciences of nature-, we can distinguish the use of three fundamental methods: The first one is symbolic-deductive (logic, mathematics, geometry, etc.)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work