• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There is evidence of design in the universe - discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

There is evidence of design in the universe - discuss. In this essay, I going to be looking at the arguments of the great philosophers over the ages, and to try and come to a conclusion to the question 'is there evidence of design in the universe?' The basic argument that brings this question into light is the inductive teleological argument. This is comparing the universe to a human designed object, normally a watch. It says that if a person was to find a watch on the floor, he would not believe that the watch had come together by chance, it had been designed, and created the way it is for a purpose, in the same way, the universe is created for a purpose. St Thomas Aquinas puts forward the argument that everything in the universe follows set laws of science, for example gravity brings rain to the ground which is moved away as a gas. He argues that these laws bring a good end to all unconscious matter therefore there must be a creator in the universe who developed and controls this law and order. ...read more.

Middle

He stated that 'the link between any human work and the work of nature is very small and weak'. In his next point, Hume is saying that the world is not like a watch, because a watch is a mechanical object whereas the world is organic and develops through evolution. With this criticism, Hume concludes there does not have to be a God who designed the world. David Hume then goes on to criticize the fact that if an analogy is going to be made then the two objects should be directly proportional to each other. Hume says that a contradiction is being made in terms of God in the Judeo-Christian understanding of God. The watch and the universe cannot be a fair analogy because Christians believe God is perfect and infinite, and we know the world is not this, therefore how can God be the designer? In his final criticism Hume says the world is possibly the result of trial and error, and that there was no purpose for the making of the world. ...read more.

Conclusion

These categories are separate from sense experience (a priori). He states that without these categories that the world would be unknowable due to peoples inability to identify order and relationships in the world. The result is that if this order is forced on us how do we know whether the real world is actually ordered. Kant also points out that the teleological argument does not show us a Christian God, instead it shows us an world architect. The God behind the argument is not perfect, all powerful, or infinite, because if he was, he would have created a perfect world. In conclusion, I feel that there is evidence of design in the universe, however it is not perfect design, due to faults such as the imperfect plates in the earth. I feel that the design in the universe is also something that may be able to be explained by coincidence. It may be possible that nothing created the universe, it just happened to have the right conditions and fall exactly into place, but as many of these theories as there are, we may never know the truth. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Vardy used the analogy of a peasant girl who falls in love with a peasant girl. Although he has the ability to force her, love cannot result out of compulsion. Thus, he chooses to win her round of her own accord.

  2. Man and the Universe

    The universe was created over a six-day period. God creates the universe by moving his spirit, and the use of speaking ("Let there be light" [Genesis 1:3]) and actively working ("Then he separated the light from the darkness" [Genesis 1:4]).

  1. The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the ...

    God" (Anne Jordan). "Therefore some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end, and this being we call God", St Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas theory is very important as it was written in the thirteenth centaury showing that it has been around for a long time.

  2. Examine the differences which may exist between a religious and scientific interpretation of the ...

    with contempt and disdain, as the commonly held belief at that time was that there was a Divine Creator, and the world was literally created as it is written in Genesis. Darwin however went against this belief, suggesting instead that every single living organism comes from a common ancestor, some simple life form that everything developed from.

  1. The Teleological Argument.

    He also argues that, 'the world as we know it shows marked evidence of adaptation to ends.' He uses the example that there is the adaptation of the parts of organic beings which nature has adapted to make man's aesthetic needs - 'Anthropic Principle'.

  2. God does not play dice, discuss.

    He compares this man-made object to the natural universe and thus concludes the universe could likewise not have been spawned from a series of chances, but in fact something so complex must have a maker too. This maker is whom he perceives god to be.

  1. Birth Of The Universe

    But She did not want to. Instead, as we say, She wanted to do it together. As She desired (and desires still), God and Goddess together gave birth to All That Is. It happened and is always happening. It always will.

  2. Does the universe have a purpose? Discuss.Every culture in the world and most religions ...

    Everything, it argues, requires a cause and to avoid infinite regress, there must be a first cause; however this first cause is something that has no cause. Therefore not everything requires a cause and the premise is invalid. Again, if there is a being which does not require a cause, why should this being not be the universe itself?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work