• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There is evidence of design in the universe - discuss.

Extracts from this document...


There is evidence of design in the universe - discuss. In this essay, I going to be looking at the arguments of the great philosophers over the ages, and to try and come to a conclusion to the question 'is there evidence of design in the universe?' The basic argument that brings this question into light is the inductive teleological argument. This is comparing the universe to a human designed object, normally a watch. It says that if a person was to find a watch on the floor, he would not believe that the watch had come together by chance, it had been designed, and created the way it is for a purpose, in the same way, the universe is created for a purpose. St Thomas Aquinas puts forward the argument that everything in the universe follows set laws of science, for example gravity brings rain to the ground which is moved away as a gas. He argues that these laws bring a good end to all unconscious matter therefore there must be a creator in the universe who developed and controls this law and order. ...read more.


He stated that 'the link between any human work and the work of nature is very small and weak'. In his next point, Hume is saying that the world is not like a watch, because a watch is a mechanical object whereas the world is organic and develops through evolution. With this criticism, Hume concludes there does not have to be a God who designed the world. David Hume then goes on to criticize the fact that if an analogy is going to be made then the two objects should be directly proportional to each other. Hume says that a contradiction is being made in terms of God in the Judeo-Christian understanding of God. The watch and the universe cannot be a fair analogy because Christians believe God is perfect and infinite, and we know the world is not this, therefore how can God be the designer? In his final criticism Hume says the world is possibly the result of trial and error, and that there was no purpose for the making of the world. ...read more.


These categories are separate from sense experience (a priori). He states that without these categories that the world would be unknowable due to peoples inability to identify order and relationships in the world. The result is that if this order is forced on us how do we know whether the real world is actually ordered. Kant also points out that the teleological argument does not show us a Christian God, instead it shows us an world architect. The God behind the argument is not perfect, all powerful, or infinite, because if he was, he would have created a perfect world. In conclusion, I feel that there is evidence of design in the universe, however it is not perfect design, due to faults such as the imperfect plates in the earth. I feel that the design in the universe is also something that may be able to be explained by coincidence. It may be possible that nothing created the universe, it just happened to have the right conditions and fall exactly into place, but as many of these theories as there are, we may never know the truth. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Man and the Universe

    he separated the light from the darkness" [Genesis 1:3-4]). Many see the dividing of day and night as symbolism of God separating good from evil. * Second Day: The firmament of heaven (known as the Sky) was created. This separated the 'two waters' or the sky and the seas ("Let

  2. The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the ...

    It claims that evolution could not be chance and there must be a designer, God. In 1930 F.R Tennant wrote a book called Philosophical Theology. He wrote three evidences which would help to prove there was a designer: "1) the fact the world can be analyzed in a rational manner 2)

  1. Examine the differences which may exist between a religious and scientific interpretation of the ...

    world in all its glory; "by the seventh day God had" completed his task, he was able to rest for a whole day.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    may be grounds for strengthening those beliefs, for example, the existence of morality may re-enforces the view that God is interested in morality. The unbeliever would not take up the argument solely on the its grounds. This is because the moral argument is based on logical error.

  1. The Teleological Argument.

    bulls seeing red. Many believe God did this on purpose. Tennant (1930), 'Philosophical Theology Vol. 2' says, The world is saturated with beauty. There is no intrinsic reason why we should be able to appreciate the beauty around us. The fact that there is a presence of beauty and we are able to

  2. God does not play dice, discuss.

    Arthur Brown was another theologian who argued design qua purpose proves existence for god. He argues that the ozone layer is evidence for design. Without the ozone layer, nature would die from ultraviolet light and oxygen would escape from the world.

  1. Birth Of The Universe

    It happened and is always happening. It always will. Out of this "was, is, and will be" a synergy emerges. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts. God/Goddess/All That Is is that whole. Feminine energy never wants to be singular or supreme. That's something that masculine energy, in its dominating principle, cannot grok. ... {laughter} ...

  2. Does the universe have a purpose? Discuss.Every culture in the world and most religions ...

    Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) stated that there is no case known (nor indeed is it possible) in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself, because in that case it would be prior to itself, which is impossible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work