• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There is evidence of design in the universe - discuss.

Extracts from this document...


There is evidence of design in the universe - discuss. In this essay, I going to be looking at the arguments of the great philosophers over the ages, and to try and come to a conclusion to the question 'is there evidence of design in the universe?' The basic argument that brings this question into light is the inductive teleological argument. This is comparing the universe to a human designed object, normally a watch. It says that if a person was to find a watch on the floor, he would not believe that the watch had come together by chance, it had been designed, and created the way it is for a purpose, in the same way, the universe is created for a purpose. St Thomas Aquinas puts forward the argument that everything in the universe follows set laws of science, for example gravity brings rain to the ground which is moved away as a gas. He argues that these laws bring a good end to all unconscious matter therefore there must be a creator in the universe who developed and controls this law and order. ...read more.


He stated that 'the link between any human work and the work of nature is very small and weak'. In his next point, Hume is saying that the world is not like a watch, because a watch is a mechanical object whereas the world is organic and develops through evolution. With this criticism, Hume concludes there does not have to be a God who designed the world. David Hume then goes on to criticize the fact that if an analogy is going to be made then the two objects should be directly proportional to each other. Hume says that a contradiction is being made in terms of God in the Judeo-Christian understanding of God. The watch and the universe cannot be a fair analogy because Christians believe God is perfect and infinite, and we know the world is not this, therefore how can God be the designer? In his final criticism Hume says the world is possibly the result of trial and error, and that there was no purpose for the making of the world. ...read more.


These categories are separate from sense experience (a priori). He states that without these categories that the world would be unknowable due to peoples inability to identify order and relationships in the world. The result is that if this order is forced on us how do we know whether the real world is actually ordered. Kant also points out that the teleological argument does not show us a Christian God, instead it shows us an world architect. The God behind the argument is not perfect, all powerful, or infinite, because if he was, he would have created a perfect world. In conclusion, I feel that there is evidence of design in the universe, however it is not perfect design, due to faults such as the imperfect plates in the earth. I feel that the design in the universe is also something that may be able to be explained by coincidence. It may be possible that nothing created the universe, it just happened to have the right conditions and fall exactly into place, but as many of these theories as there are, we may never know the truth. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Teleological Argument.

    Their purpose is to carry on the organism in the world. If there were no purpose in living then most organisms would have simply died out by now. This supports the teleological argument. As there is order in the world, there is a need to seek for an explanation.

  2. Does the universe have a purpose? Discuss.Every culture in the world and most religions ...

    "If I am still to remain in utter ignorance of causes, and can give an absolute explanation of nothing, I shall never esteem it any advantage to shove off for a moment a difficulty which...must immediately, in its full force, recur upon me...It were better, therefore, never to look beyond the present material world."

  1. Examine the differences which may exist between a religious and scientific interpretation of the ...

    Religion was at its most powerful, when most of the world was left in ignorance, but gradually science has begun to explain what was once viewed as miracles caused solely by the power of God. This explanation of the issue does however seem to be scornful of the church, whereas

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    The same criticism can be applied to objective law. The fact that no one can establish the precise origin of these laws calls its divinity into question supporting the non-religious argument for the presence of morality. The concept of objective law has been attacked by many relativist theories. Many philosophers argue that morality is more than a simple meaning of obeying objective law from example, Fletcher's situation ethics.

  1. Man and the Universe

    Christianity is classified as an Abrahamic religion, sharing many links with both Judaism and Islam. Abrahamic religions all believe in creation as ex nihilo (meaning 'out of nothing'). It can be seen through the line "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" (Genesis 1:1), that appears in

  2. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    It is not legitimate to use what could not be otherwise as evidence of intelligent planning. 'I would fain ask how an animal could subsist unless its parts were so adjusted?' In other words it is not surprising that the human body is perfectly adjusted, if you had no lungs you could not breathe and you would die.

  1. In what ways have design arguments needed to be modified in the twentieth century?

    statement that at which point we can argue that the multiplicity of circumstances leads us to a conclusion that this did not happen by accident. He said that the universe has an order; things in this world have a purpose to them.

  2. God does not play dice, discuss.

    and how it all fixes together is seen as too complexly interlinked to have fallen together by accident. Similarly, there are comparisons of this in nature. William Paley put forward his idea of the watch analogy. In this he pondered upon how a sophisticated watch had come to be in a deserted field.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work