• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There is no adequate explanation at to why an all-loving, all-powerful God would allow suffering. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


There is no adequate explanation at to why an all-loving, all-powerful God would allow suffering. Discuss. The presence of evil and suffering in the world is a major argument against the existence of God. The problem of evil is a dilemma especially for those who uphold of the God of Classical Theism. For many people it is the horrendous depth of suffering and the extent of human selfishness and greed that makes the concept of a loving and powerful God unlikely. For religious people in general, the devastating effects of evil, asks the question why an all-powerful and all-loving God permit the creations created by God suffer, without any form of help and ending this evil. Evil is divided into two separate categories. There is moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is when a person has the intentions to inflict pain and suffering on person, for example, the Holocaust in which six million people were killed. Natural evil is suffering caused without the intentions by natural forces, for example, earthquakes. St.Augustine constructed the usual traditional response from a Christian perspective to the problem of evil. He has also composed the majority report of the Christian mind throughout the centuries as it includes both philosophical and theological strands. ...read more.


If humans were made ready perfect there would be no free will. This means that the natural order had to be created with the possibility of causing harm, humans to be imperfect and God to stand back from the creations. Humans disobeyed God, which caused suffering and God cannot remove evil to compromise the freedom of humans. Evil and suffering will be overcome and everyone will be developed into God's likeness. Irenaeus said that God was somewhat responsible for evil. God's responsibility extended to create humans imperfect and made it their task to develop into perfection. Irenaeus said that humans were created in God's image and later that they would be developed into God's likeness. Being in God's image is to have intelligence, morality and personality. Completion would be gained upon transformation into God's likeness. He argued that those who say that God should never allow evil to happen is to say God should take away humanity. If God was to intervene every time an evil act occurred, there would be in fact not any freedom to commit evil. John Hick took an Irenaeus stance. He believed that ready-made goodness is not as valuable as goodness developed freely. ...read more.


Religious people object to it because it contradicts religious texts including the Bible. It makes moral behaviour worthless if everyone is to be rewarded with Heaven. People can accept from the counterfactual hypothesis that the process of soul making could not take place in a paradise. Does the world need to contain the extent and severity of suffering found in such events that has the killing of millions? Another problem is that love can never be expressed by allowing any amount of suffering no matter what the reason. D.Z. Phillips argued that it would never be justified to hurt someone in order to help them. When considering the magnitude of the suffering in the world, the problem is more serious. Those people who already have faith in God, the responses will be different. Reference can be made to God's goodness to humanity, proved in gifts such as messengers or eternal life and the like. Some of the responses adjust the nature of God and the nature of evil. Attempts have been made to harmonise evil with the existence of God of Classical Theism. Each theodicy has its strengths and its weaknesses. The problem of evil was a major argument against the existence of God. It depends upon the beliefs of the subject. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Show how the theodicies of Irenaeus and Augustine account for natural evil.

    However other religious believers may believe that God created free will and therefore we are able to choose between good or evil, so evil and suffering comes from human misuse of freewill.

  2. Outline the Contribution that Process Theology Makes to Solving the Problem of Evil & ...

    While process theologians believe that, overall this world is preferable to no world at all because the good ultimately outweighs the bad it is easy to question this. Individually, people who are suffering from evil are hardly likely to be comforted by the thought that there are enough people enjoying themselves to make their own suffering worthwhile.

  1. Good and Evil

    Another medieval philosopher, Saint Augustine attempted to deal with this issue by denying the actual existence of moral evil. What we perceive as evil is, he argued, merely distance from God. Hell is the ultimate alienation from God, he said.

  2. Arguments about god.

    A few examples of what a personal experience could be: * The feeling of wonder and peace, Christians get when they enter a holy building or somewhere significant to God. * Another experience is 'conversion' this is where someone normally (not necessarily a Christian)

  1. Persuasive Writing on the Holocaust

    This was when all the nationwide Jews were taken from their Businesses or Synagogues. His brother who also stood up got killed in WWII. He strongly believes that Jews should stand up and not let the Germans get away. After leaving the concentration camp he became a rabbi.

  2. Critically Discuss D.Z. Phillips Conception of Immortality.

    Following on from Wittgenstein's attack on the notion of logical privacy, Phillips thinks that this idea of the soul is "fundamentally confused". Phillips argues that it is impossible to divorce private experience from public life and as such any conception of the soul as a separate substance is entirely fallacious.

  1. Explain how the theodicy of Irenaeus differs from that of Augustine.

    However, modern scholars see the creation myths of Genesis 1-3 as insubstantial and much more likely to have been vehicles for explaining the qualities of God than being meant as absolutely factual accounts of the creation of the Earth. The recent Darwinian theory of evolution also contradicts the ideas expressed

  2. Research on St Augustine Theodicy.

    first came from? As far as Augustine is concerned evil entered the world as a result of the wrong choices of free beings (free in the sense that there was no external force necessitating them to do wrong). Thus corruption occurred as a result of, 'A willful turning of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work