THERE SHOULD BE NO RICH PEOPLE AS LONG AS THERE IS POVERTY IN THE WORLD" DO I AGREE? In this essay I intend to analyse the above statement and hope to come to a justified conclusion.

Authors Avatar

B.1

“THERE SHOULD BE NO RICH PEOPLE AS LONG AS THERE IS POVERTY IN THE WORLD” DO I AGREE?

In this essay I intend to analyse the above statement and hope to come to a justified conclusion.

One  point to consider is if there were no rich people then there would not be able to give to the poor.  Also it is necessary to be rich so that people know what poverty is. On the other hand the rich people should give money to those who do not have enough to survive rather than spend the money on pleasures they do not need, for example Ferraris.   Is it fair to people who have worked hard all their life and gained wealth fairly to give to the poor? In some places poverty is considered a test and is suffered so that the tested may go to heaven, for example in Indonesia people believe that the tsunami was an act of God and have henceforth closed all casinos and gambling places along the shores.  

Join now!

There is a parable in the Bible that tells us about what we should do with our money. In this parable it compares money to talents; it is called the Parable of the Talent (Matt C18 :v24) and it is a story about a rich man giving his talents away to his servants. This is significant in this question because the rich man rewarded the servant who made the most of his talents so the rich man is symbolic of God and he is giving talents (money) to his people and he is only pleased if we use what ...

This is a preview of the whole essay