• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"There should be no rich religious people as long as there is poverty." I will examine eight points of view and explain them in and what could to those opinions then, based on those, come to my own conclusions.

Extracts from this document...


There Should Be No Rich Religious People As Long As There Is Poverty. "There should be no rich religious people as long as there is poverty." I will examine eight points of view and explain them in and what could to those opinions then, based on those, come to my own conclusions. 'Religious People Could Do More' Religious people in that 10% are prone to having spare money, yet not much is done. If they were to donate enough money poverty could be brought to an end in a variety of places. This would mean a lot of money being donated, but if you have the responsibility given to you by your God to look after your neighbour you should obey with no reluctance. That is, if you are truly religious. The religious people would fund-raise and donate. 'Everyone is responsible to help the poor' Any religious person should automatically agree with this on the basis that many religions state that those who follow its teachings should give to the poor, let alone just normal people with no particular beliefs. ...read more.


medical career were to have �17,000 and �180,000 respectively, taken from them and given �53,000 each it wouldn't be fair as the surgeon would've had to worked really hard to get to where he is while the street-sweeper may have got his job for the asking. All religious people have to do is give their spare money, but not what they need. If they work hard, why should they if they are not doing it so that they can get by? 'There's no point in everyone being poor' This seems like a totally selfish point, and any religious person would agree. It is however, a sensible point, only in the sense that it coincides with the two points made above. The only two alternatives to this are everyone having an equal share of money (Greed prevails. More poverty spreads to a level worse then before.) Or us becoming poor through giving so much and it going towards so little because of how bad the situation are in poor countries and how much it costs to repair. Religious people should not be rich, neither poor, which once again, means they should give what they could spare. ...read more.


He spent money to help his people on himself. What is the point of giving money to a charity if it is just going to be spent on mansions instead of water pumps for villages? This should only increase reluctance to donating to charity, so it is in a sense, acceptable to not donate money, so maybe it is possible that there acceptable circumstances for a religious person being rich if they don't want to give money to the greedy, not the needy. Looking at these different views, I see that there are plenty of reasons for there not being rich people while there are not poor people. However, I think there should be rich people while there are poor people because that everybody having the same money is merely a dream. It wouldn't last long, greed would take over and we would find ourselves where we are now, if not worse. I believe rich people should give money, of course. It's just that giving all or most of their money will render them in poverty too, and with corrupt governments the donation may have been worthless too. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development essays

  1. There should be no rich people as long as there is poverty in the ...

    It's not a fault of the rich that there are poor people, they didn't cause it. The rich work hard to earn their money and they deserve it, they work so they keep and spend it on themselves not on someone who's poor, can't work.


    But from another angle some people have gone through a lot of hardship to get their money - is it fair on them to have to give their well earned money to others, or if you get your money through the will of a close relative should that also be given to charity ?

  1. "You cannot be truly religious and rich" Do you agree? Give reasons for your ...

    more reluctant they are to give away their money to benefit others, whereas those who are not so well off, are happy to help others out. This statement proves that it is difficult to be truly religious and maintain your richness as wealth has been proven to be an obstacle on the road to becoming truly religious.

  2. Health in London between 1850 and 1910 - source based work.

    This showed the effect of poverty. Ignorance of ordinary people and what made them ill and then using the same medicine JOLOP. 4) SOURCE D - DOES THIS SUGGEST THAT POVERTY OR LACK OF KNOWELDGE WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT REASON FOR THE SPREAD OF SMALLPOX?

  1. Identify four causes of the increase in poverty and vagrancy in the Tudor period.

    This was streamlined in 1601, it was much enlightened and indeed much more sympathetic towards the problems of Poverty and vagrancy. It was so good it stayed on the statute book until 1834. Much of the ideas to deal with the poor and vagrants in Elizabethan times cam e from John Aldrich who had been the mayor of Norwich.

  2. "There should be no rich muslims as long as there is poverty in the ...

    There's also no use counting and re-counting your wealth because it's not going to do you any good. The prophet (saw) said that: "He who eats and drinks whilst his brother goes hungry is not one of us." (Bukhari) This saying of the prophet (saw)

  1. thre should be no rich people int the world as long as there is ...

    However many people would disagree with the statement because if we rich people in the world then it can be a good thing as they have power, the know how and influence to change things and help the poor. They can have some say in the policies and ideas to help the poor.


    Usually, children born into this culture tend to follow the footsteps of their parents and will stay in poverty. They will not take advantages of good opportunities such as education which could help them to break this cycle. "As part of an unskilled labour force, the children studied by Lewis

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work