• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"There should be no rich religious people as long as there is poverty." I will examine eight points of view and explain them in and what could to those opinions then, based on those, come to my own conclusions.

Extracts from this document...


There Should Be No Rich Religious People As Long As There Is Poverty. "There should be no rich religious people as long as there is poverty." I will examine eight points of view and explain them in and what could to those opinions then, based on those, come to my own conclusions. 'Religious People Could Do More' Religious people in that 10% are prone to having spare money, yet not much is done. If they were to donate enough money poverty could be brought to an end in a variety of places. This would mean a lot of money being donated, but if you have the responsibility given to you by your God to look after your neighbour you should obey with no reluctance. That is, if you are truly religious. The religious people would fund-raise and donate. 'Everyone is responsible to help the poor' Any religious person should automatically agree with this on the basis that many religions state that those who follow its teachings should give to the poor, let alone just normal people with no particular beliefs. ...read more.


medical career were to have �17,000 and �180,000 respectively, taken from them and given �53,000 each it wouldn't be fair as the surgeon would've had to worked really hard to get to where he is while the street-sweeper may have got his job for the asking. All religious people have to do is give their spare money, but not what they need. If they work hard, why should they if they are not doing it so that they can get by? 'There's no point in everyone being poor' This seems like a totally selfish point, and any religious person would agree. It is however, a sensible point, only in the sense that it coincides with the two points made above. The only two alternatives to this are everyone having an equal share of money (Greed prevails. More poverty spreads to a level worse then before.) Or us becoming poor through giving so much and it going towards so little because of how bad the situation are in poor countries and how much it costs to repair. Religious people should not be rich, neither poor, which once again, means they should give what they could spare. ...read more.


He spent money to help his people on himself. What is the point of giving money to a charity if it is just going to be spent on mansions instead of water pumps for villages? This should only increase reluctance to donating to charity, so it is in a sense, acceptable to not donate money, so maybe it is possible that there acceptable circumstances for a religious person being rich if they don't want to give money to the greedy, not the needy. Looking at these different views, I see that there are plenty of reasons for there not being rich people while there are not poor people. However, I think there should be rich people while there are poor people because that everybody having the same money is merely a dream. It wouldn't last long, greed would take over and we would find ourselves where we are now, if not worse. I believe rich people should give money, of course. It's just that giving all or most of their money will render them in poverty too, and with corrupt governments the donation may have been worthless too. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development essays

  1. "You cannot be truly religious and rich" Do you agree? Give reasons for your ...

    The true definition of the word 'rich' is "something that is rich in something contains a large amount, e.g. someone who is rich owns desirable possessions and has a lot of money". This definition proves that just because you are rich does not mean that you are not truly religious,

  2. Why isn't the world equal? Our world is divided in to two - those ...

    The distribution of wealth is unjust not only among countries, but also within the countries,in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. One million of the richest people in the world are 150 times richer than the 1000 millions of the poorest, and thi difference too has doubled in the past 30 years.

  1. The differences between rich and poor countries.

    Cities like Mexico City and many others in the less developed world have grown very rapidly in population in recent years. The cities attract people (PULL factors) because they offer the promise of a better life. The rural areas are often poor and over populated, encouraging people to leave (PUSH factors).

  2. "There should be no rich muslims as long as there is poverty in the ...

    of this life and we'll be rewarded with paradise in the here after (insha'Allah). Even if everybody was equal, we would end up like we are now. The shaytaan is in this life and he is always tempting us to do evil.


    320). Other research of Betty Lou Valentine (1970) suggests that the lifestyle of the poor changes from community to community and within it. Some sociologists such as Muriel Brown and Nicola Madge (1982) reached the same conclusion about poverty in Britain: "All evidence suggests that cultural values are not important for the development and transmission of deprivation.

  2. There should be no rich people as long as there is poverty in the ...

    If they cannot do that then their hearts are cold, as anyone should feel guilty and should feel that it is not nice for me not to share the wealth owned.

  1. Good evening debaters, chairperson, adjudicators,and audience. Today I will be describing to you how ...

    Yet the situations aren't comparable. Mountain climbers don't depend on massive government subsidies when they put their lives at risk. When America and Russia collectively invests in a venture whose only real payoff is glory, failure is discouraging. Even success is a turnoff.

  2. Why are some parts of China so rich while other parts are so poor?

    Although this is a great problem even today, Deng's One Child Policy has slowed down the rate of starvation and poverty. In some ways it has proven to be a success but in others it has not. Deng's second attempt was the 'Rush to Riches.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work