To what extent, and in what respects, can it be argued that humankind is unique?

Authors Avatar

To what extent, and in what respects, can it be argued that humankind unique?

It is accepted that every single Human being on the planet is different. There may be striking similarities between parents and offspring but ultimately everyone is different. Darwin believed that animals and humans evolved and weren’t made / designed by God. He believed that we evolved to our surroundings and that ‘Natural selection,’ decide who will and who won’t survive, basically survival of the fittest.

The theory of ‘Natural selection is this:

  • In any species there are individual members whose particular characteristics help them to survive better than others.
  • Those who survive to adulthood are able to reproduce passing on those characteristics to the next generation.
  • Those characteristics will help the younger generation to evolve and favour those who enable survival; creating a system where nature selects the fittest to survive.
Join now!

But here characteristics are being passed down, and therefore it can be said that it’s the same being but slightly sharper senses etc, there’s nothing really unique about a fox or a rabbit with sharper senses, its only better at survival. But in the case of human beings there are other remarkable changes which put an element of doubt to the theory of natural selection.

        Every single human on the planet has a different finger print. A different fingerprint doesn’t really aid survival, it’s not really a characteristic that is passed down, it just happens. This suggests to me ...

This is a preview of the whole essay