• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Is the Welfare State Responsible For Creating a Culture of Dependency?

Extracts from this document...


TO WHAT EXTENT IS THE WELFARE STATE RESPONSIBLE FOR CREATING A CULTURE OF DEPENDENCY? STUDENT NAME: Lisa Murphy TUTOR NAME: Eddie McKeever SUBJECT: Sociology (DIFS) SUBMISSION DATE: 16th March 2005 TO WHAT EXTENT IS THE WELFARE STATE RESPONSIBLE FOR CREATING A CULTURE OF DEPENDENCY? In this essay I want to be able to determine to what extent the welfare state is responsible for creating 'a culture of dependency.' I will be using several different resources to gather my information, such as the internet and books. The causes of poverty There are two differing types of explanations for the causes of poverty: > Dependency > Exclusion Dependency explanations These approaches argue that people are poor because of some deficiency in themselves or which is passed on in the group to which they belong in society. Within this overall approach to explaining the causes of poverty, we can distinguish approaches which have different emphases. These are: > the underclass > culture of poverty The Underclass This argument was first developed by an American man called Charles Murray who claims that an underclass exists of people who are lazy and make no effort to work or look after themselves. They have come to believe that it is their right to receive benefits from the government and not have to work. ...read more.


Although changes have been introduced in the system since it was initiated between 1945-50, it remains fundamentally the same. However, from 1979 to 1997 the Conservative government showed that it would like to see the system, partially dismantled in favour of a two-tier scheme. For instance, in the sphere of medicine, it would like to have seen more people paying for private health care whilst only those who could not afford to pay would go to the National Health Service. The reasons why the Labour Government introduced a Welfare State have to be seen against: > The background of twenty hears of mass unemployment before the Second World War, when there was little help given to alleviate poverty. > The previous measures introduced by the Liberal government were found to be totally inadequate. > The wartime destruction of British cities gave the drive for the construction of new, better-built houses in well planned environments. > There was an overwhelming desire shared by the mass of the British people never to return to pre-war conditions. Advantages of the Welfare State > It has eliminated the worst excesses of poverty > It helps people who through no fault of their own (such as a physical disability) are unable to work, and without financial aid would be reduced to begging or voluntary charity. ...read more.


Those who are on this benefit do not have to pay council tax, or prescription and dental charges amongst others. If this benefit did not exist families may be better off on unemployment benefit. Dean and Taylor-Gobby have also criticised the dependency theory. They argue that the idea that the Welfare State has created a population who are content not to work, is a myth. Dean and Taylor-Gobby carried out an investigation which involved conducting eighty five in depth interviews of benefit claimants. They found that all but four of their sample had not lost the desire to work. However, they did find that some of their sample were reluctant to come off welfare benefits to take low paid work, thus, supporting the work of Jordan. Therefore it can be argued that rather than welfare benefits creating a burden of dependency, it has created a reluctant population of dependants. In conclusion, it would appear that if sociologists and politicians wish to understand the reasons why individuals do not give up a life on welfare for a job, the world of work needs to be examined. The government however, are doing very little to tempt people back into the workforce, therefore it could be said that the government are somewhat contributing to this dependency. It would then seem that in this instance that the government wants to have its cake and eat it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development essays

  1. The State of the World Today

    aren't doing anything to alleviate this poverty and hence are just as bad. Yo', whatever happened to the values of humanity Whatever happened to the fairness in equality Instead in spreading love we spreading animosity Lack of understanding, leading lives away from unity...

  2. Livable Wages to American Citizens

    Without a livable-wage income, people suffer a lack of dignity and a variety of social and health problems. The livable-wage income indicator is defined as the percent of the population living in households with a total income that is less than twice the poverty level, as defined by the federal government.

  1. To what extent do the practices of charitable organisations comply with charity laws and ...

    The charity sector is under increased media scrutiny since the exposure of notorious fund-embezzling incidents. Consequently, donors now demand to know what exactly happened to their money or goods - whether they did, in fact, go to their purported causes.

  2. Outline and assess sociological explanations for the increase in poverty when living standards for ...

    In this way the poverty of the parents is passed on to children. Ken Coates and Richard Silburn showed in their study of St.Ann's in Nottingham that poverty resulted from a series of multiple deprivations.

  1. The thorny issue of social exclusion is once again in the headlines.

    Mo Mowlam described the initiative as a "new drive to close the poverty gap." She said that she recognised "that there are still too many communities, too many families, not sharing in our rising prosperity.

  2. Health in London between 1850 and 1910 - source based work.

    of the poverty which is also important as result in this source. Linking this source-to-source f, which has a connective because poverty is the cause of poor health. In this source it shows that not enough houses for the poor.

  1. The origins of social security lie much further back in our social history than ...

    It was believed that this would encourage the poor to work in the belief that they would be better off in employment. The attitude towards the poor was still very negative and many poor found the system very demeaning as means testing was used.

  2. How effectively did the Liberals help children, the old and the unemployed?

    So the Liberals decided to begin with they would introduce the free school meals act, this was brought in to make sure that children received one proper meal a day however there were limitation to this and some local authorities chose to ignore this and in the end only half

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work