• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what Extent was Hitler’s Euthanasia policy a distinct “Nazi” Policy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Contents: SectionA_______________________________________________________3 Section B_______________________________________________________ 3 Section C_______________________________________________________ 4 Section D_______________________________________________________ 5 Section E______________________________________________________ 6 Section F______________________________________________________7 Appendices_____________________________________________________8 Section A: Plan of Investigation This report investigates how the Hitler's Euthanasia policy emerged and to the reason why Nazis had a drive to kill those people they considered "classified" as being "unworthy of life". The people in question, Hitler referred to as a threat to "race hygiene" and a huge threat to the "Aryan Race."1This idea of Euthanasia, which basically meant the slaughtering of mentally and physically ill patients, was in sense Hitler's way of enforcing racial hygiene with a non-voluntary euthanasia. This also lead the way to new fresh ideas for the establishment of massive concentration camps with the main purpose of killing Jews, gypsies and homosexuals etc. Hitler considered them inferior and maybe stretched the idea of euthanasia too far to be considered inside the policy boundaries. Does this suggest that this was not a distinctive Nazi policy? In my investigation I establish this idea using six source, four being primary and secondary websites, one primary picture taken at one of the camps and a lecture given to me by Aaron Sternetsky which is a very valuable source. ...read more.

Middle

At first glance it looks normal; it would not seem likely that the showers would emit pure Carbon monoxide gas. Another use of this source is the portrayal of the Nazi's tactics to lure people into these institutions. Another key usefulness for this sources shows that the idea of showers releasing gas did not begin in the concentration camps but in the various Euthanasia institutions. the limitations of this source is that is shows only part of the chamber and thus cannot get a clear image of how convincing these "shower rooms" actually were and also it does not clearly show how many people could fit in such room to be killed. Also although this is a previous gas chamber the picture was taken recently and there may have been alterations done to the chambers to slide the thoughts of many people into thinking one way. Source B: The video source (refer to appendix 8) is Firsthand account of Robert Wagemanns near to death experience at the euthanasia camps. It is highly useful in respect to it being a primary source which is a significant bonus for a historian. ...read more.

Conclusion

In Karl Brandt's, head of the T4 opinion, Hitler individually permitted gas as being the most "humane" process of mass extermination.14 Section E In conclusion to all the evidence provided that the Euthanasia program was a great indicator for the later establishment of the concentration camps for the Jews. In my opinion the Euthanasia was to an extent not a distinctive Nazi policy but merely a quick and easy cover for Hitler's hatred for Jews. What Hitler did certainly did not follow the definition for euthanasia and can be said that he manipulated it to his own version of euthanasia but the original euthanasia cannot be credited to the Nazi policy. The involuntary euthanasia of children and adolescents who were mentally or physically challenged, although considered murder was still in the constraints of the euthanasia policy. Hitler's aims for this was not the extermination of mentally disabled but more the cleansing of Jews from the German infrastructure. Hitler intended on establishing an "arichen Herrenvolk" 15which was known as the Aryan race, the race without impure blood or disabilities. He did so once in the late 1930's and the same idea carried through to the concentration camps for Jews later on. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    Muslims are against Euthanasia because they believe that it is Allah's chooses how long each human will live, and humans should not interfere with this. They believe that life is sacred because it is given by their god, Allah. Muslims have formed their opinions on Euthanasia through the teachings of the Qur'an (their holy book).

  2. Euthanasia -Humane or insane?

    This survey shows that doctor's opinions are almost split 50/50 over the matter. In fact twenty two doctors from the survey actually confessed to having broken the law and helped someone die. Euthanasia may be illegal but it definitely hits a nerve within public.

  1. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    express a patient's thoughts towards his future medical treatment and allow anyone capable of making decisions to tell the doctor beforehand that they do not wish to be put on life support. (Rachels 1986). The government on the other hand does not have the right to make people suffer or give one groups of people (doctors)

  2. Euthanasia B

    'Anything which says to the ill that they are a burden to their family and that they are better off dead is unacceptable. What sort of society could let its old folk die because they are in the way?' Volunteer's opinion on Euthanasia.

  1. Can Euthanasia be justified?

    - But if we follow the will of God, they will die anyway, so why should we spend our time and money keeping them alive, where without our help, they would be dead anyway, especially the ones under machine control. - What is the meaning and value of human existence?

  2. Choose a case which you consider to be of crucial importance for medical ethics ...

    the risk of abuse" It can maybe be understood from the very last part of the extract above why the court did not grant Mrs pretty the right for her husband to assist her suicide, for the courts fear that should such a right be introduced, abuse will follow.

  1. What is euthanasia?

    And that a human being who insists that they have the right to die is denying the truth of their fundamental relationship with God. The Russian Orthodox Church sees difference between euthanasia and withholding of treatment to prolong life. It affirms the sanctity of life and believes that life is

  2. Abortion and Euthanasia

    would be a risk to the physical or mental health of the Mother. Or that the foetus may be born with a serious physical or mental handicap. Doctors are able to take into account her reasonable foreseeable environment so social factors can be involved in the medical decision.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work